[
Anderson, D.R. (1987). Creativity and the philosophy of C.S. Peirce. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-015-7760-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Basu, M. (in press). Krishnamurti’s Insights on Observation for Global Childhood Education and Research. In N.J. Yelland, L. Peters, N. Fairchild, M. Tesar & M.S. Perez (Eds), The SAGE Handbook of Global Childhoods (pp. 219–233). Sage.10.4135/9781529757194.n19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A. (2019). Abductive reasoning and the genesis of new ideas: Charles S. Peirce. In V. P. Glaveanu (Ed.), Creativity Reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A. (in press). Engaging uncertainty: Principles and provocations for promoting creative learning futures. In D. Henriksen & P. Mishra (Eds.), Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning. Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beghetto, R.A., & Vasquez, A.M. (in press). Creative learning: A pedagogical perspective. In L.J. Ball & F. Vallee-Tourangeau (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Creative Cognition. New York: Routledge
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boden, M. (1998). Computer Models of Creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 351–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807916.02010.1017/CBO9780511807916.020
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corazza, G.E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 258–267.10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giaccardi, E., & Candy, L. (2009). Creativity and cognition 2007: Materialities of Creativity. Leonardo, 42(3), 194–196.10.1162/leon.2009.42.3.194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V.P. (2012), What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects, and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.1310.1002/jocb.13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glăveanu, V.P. (2015). The status of the social in creativity studies and the pitfalls of dichotomic thinking. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-001610.1515/ctra-2015-0016
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., & P. Mishra (Eds.). (in press). Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning. Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rothenberg, A. (2014). Flight from wonder: An investigation of scientific creativity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199988792.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco M.A. (2019) Creativity as a Dynamic, Personal, Parsimonious Process. In: Beghetto R., Corazza G. (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity. Creativity theory and action in education, vol. 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_1010.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Runco, M.A. & Beghetto, R.A. (2018). Primary and secondary creativity. Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7–10.10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sternberg, R.J.(2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_1010.1207/s15326934crj1801_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stokes, P.D. (2010). Using constraints to develop creativity in the classroom. In R.A. Beghetto & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 88–112). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511781629.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tanggaard, L. (2013). The sociomateriality of creativity in everyday life. Culture & Psychology, 19, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X1246498710.1177/1354067X12464987
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tanggaard, L., & Beghetto, R.A. (2015). Ideational pathways: Toward a new approach for studying the life of ideas. Creativity: Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-001710.1515/ctra-2015-0017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Treadaway, C. (2009). Materiality, memory and imagination: Using empathy to research creativity. Leonardo, 42(3), 231–203.10.1162/leon.2009.42.3.231
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vallée-Tourangeau, F., & March, P.L. (2019). Insight Out: Making Creativity Visible. Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.40910.1002/jocb.409
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wertsch, J.V., Del Rio, P., Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ziegler, R., & Diehl, M. (1998). Computer supported idea generation. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 351–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978051180791610.1017/CBO9780511807916
]Search in Google Scholar