[
1. Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y. (2015). Conceptualizing and assessing higher-order thinking in reading. Theory into Practice, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 203-212.10.1080/00405841.2015.1044367
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In Handbook of Reading Research, Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., Barr, R. (Eds.), Vol. 3, pp. 285-310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Allan, D. (2004). Oxford Placement Test 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bajšanski, I. (2011). Nadgledanje razumijevanja narativnoga i ekspozitornoga teksta: Odnos između apsolutne i relativne točnosti metakognitivnih procjena. Psihologijske teme/Psychological Topics, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 153-170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Baker, L., Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. Handbook of Reading Research, Vol. 1, pp. 353-394.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., Esquivel, S. (2013). Practical Considerations for Using Exploratory Factor Analysis in Educational Research. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 18, Article 6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Council of Europe (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Available at https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages/level-descriptions [27 October 2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. European Union (2020). MOCK Case Study AD Generalists. Available at http://europa.eu/epso/doc/archive/apply/sample_test/pdf/casestudy2_en.pdf [20 October 2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Gorsuch, R. (1983). Factor analysis. Erlbaum, Newark, NJ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Kolić-Vehovec, S., Bajšanski, I. (2001). Konstrukcija upitnika strategijskog čitanja. Psihologijske teme, Vol. 10, pp. 51-62.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Kolić-Vehovec, S., Bajšanski, I. (2006). Dobne i spolne razlike u nekim vidovima metakognicije I razumijevanja pri čitanju. Društvena istraživanja: časopis za opća društvena pitanja, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1005-1027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Kolić-Vrhovec, S., Bajšanski, I., Rončević Zubković, B. (2011). The role of reading strategies in scientific text comprehension and academic achievement of university students. Review of psychology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 81-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. (2009). Theories of comprehension skill: Knowledge and strategies versus capacity and suppression. Progress in Experimental Psychology Research. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Hauppauge, NY.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. McNamara, D. S., O’Reilly, T. P., Best, R. M., Ozuru, Y. (2006). Improving adolescent students’ reading comprehension with iSTART. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 147-171.10.2190/1RU5-HDTJ-A5C8-JVWE
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Miholic, V. (1994). An inventory to pique students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Reading, Vol. 38, pp. 84-86.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94, No. 2, pp. 249-259.10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Pereira-Laird, J. A., Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology: An International Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 185-235.10.1080/0270271970180301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. PISA (2009). Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science. Available at https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/44455820.pdf [20 October 2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Pressley, M., Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Snow, C. E. (2002). Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand, Santa Monica, CA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Tabachnick, B., Fidell, L. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Taraban, R., Kerr, M., Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and Pragmatic Factors in College Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategies. Reading Psychology, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 67-81.10.1080/02702710490435547
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. United Nations (2020). Careers. Young Professionals Program. Available at https://careers.un.org/lbw/home.aspx?viewtype=NCES [20 October 2020].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Weir, C., Khalifa, H. (2008). A cognitive processing approach towards defining reading comprehension. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, Vol. 31, pp. 2-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Wood, E., Motz, M., Willoughby, T. (1998). Examining students’ retrospective memories of strategy development. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 698-704.10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.698
]Search in Google Scholar
