1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The quality of duck meat – from the perspective of physical measurements and expert judgment

Published Online: 16 May 2022
Volume & Issue: AHEAD OF PRINT
Page range: -
Received: 16 Nov 2021
Accepted: 31 Mar 2022
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2300-8733
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationships between some physicochemical properties and organoleptic assessments of duck meat quality and expert assessment of the general appearance of raw breast and leg muscles. Body, carcass, breast and leg muscle weight were analysed. For both breast and leg muscles the following parameters were recorded: water holding capacity, thermal drip, colour lightness L*, electrical conductivity after 15 minutes and 24 hours post mortem, as well as four traits subject to expert organoleptic evaluation (general appearance, colour, odour and fatness). The dependence was evaluated using the Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression equations (the general appearance was treated as a dependent variable). Three sets of variables were considered as factors influencing the general appearance of the raw breast and leg muscles. First, the influence of jointly selected performance traits and physiochemical properties of meat was analysed. Next, the impact of only the second-mentioned group of discriminants was considered, and then the dependence on other organoleptic attributes. It was shown that for both muscle groups, the following have a significant effect on the general appearance: muscle weight (breast muscle p < 0.0001, leg muscle p < 0.0001) in the first set, electrical conductivity 15 minutes after slaughter (breast muscle p = 0.023, leg muscle p = 0.042) in the second, and colour (both muscle groups p < 0.0001) in the third. Muscle weight, electrical conductivity 15 minutes post mortem and visually assessed colour can be used to make a preliminary assessment of the technological and culinary quality of duck meat. Moreover, measurement with a conductometer is an economical and fast method, possible to carry out in a slaughterhouse.

Keywords

Baeza E. (2006). Major trends in research into domestic ducks and recent results concerning meat quality. Proceedings of 12th European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy: p. 8. Search in Google Scholar

Baeza E., Guillier L., Petracci M. (2021). Review: Production factors affecting poultry carcass and meat quality attributes. Animal, 100331. Search in Google Scholar

Baryłko-Pikielna N., Matuszewska I. (2009). Sensory food research. Fundamentals–Methods–Applications Wydawnictwo Naukowe PTTŻ, Kraków, 375 pp. (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

Biswas S., Banerjee R., Bhattacharyya D., Patra G., Das A. K., Das S. K. (2019). Technological investigation into duck meat and its products – a potential alternative to chicken. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 75: 609-620.. Search in Google Scholar

Castellini C., Berri C., le Bihan-Duval E., Martino G. (2008). Qualitative attributes and consumer perception of organic and freerange poultry meat. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 64: 500-512. Search in Google Scholar

CIE. (1986). Colorimetry. Publication Commission International de l’Eclairage 15.2, 2nd ed. Central Bureau of CIE, Vienna, Austria. Search in Google Scholar

Czerny M., Christlbauer M., Christlbauer M., Fischer A., Granvogl M., Hammer M., Hartl C., Hernandez N. M., Schieberle P. (2008). Re-investigation on odour thresholds of key food aroma compounds and development of an aroma language based on odour qualities of defined aqueous odorant solutions. Eur. Food Res. Technol., 228: 265-273.10.1007/s00217-008-0931-x Search in Google Scholar

Czyżak-Runowska G., Łyczyński A., Pospiech E., Koćwin-Podsiadła M., Wojtczak J., Rzosińska E., Mikołajczak B., Grześ B., Iwańska E., Krzęcio E., Sieczkowska H., Antosik K. (2010). Electrical conductivity as an indicator of pork meat quality. J. Cent. Europ Agric., 11: 105-112.10.5513/JCEA01/11.1.826 Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher D.L. (2002). Poultry meat quality. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 58: 131-145.10.1079/WPS20020013 Search in Google Scholar

Florowski T., Słowiński M., Dasiewicz K. (2002). Colour measurements as a method for the estimation of certain chicken meat quality indicators. Electron. J. Pol. Agric. Univ. Ser. Food Sci. Technol. 5 (2), #11. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume5/issue2/food/art-11.html. Search in Google Scholar

Font-Furnols M., Guerrero L. (2014). Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci., 98: 361-371.10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.025 Search in Google Scholar

Gornowicz E., Szwaczkowski T., Pietrzak M., Graczyk M. (2015). Effect of carcass weight on meat colour of pekin ducks. Żywność Nauka Technologia Jakość, 22: 60-72 (in Polish)10.15193/ZNTJ/2015/101/056 Search in Google Scholar

Graczyk M., Gornowicz E., Mucha S., Lisowski M., Grajewski B., Radziszewska J., Pietrzak M., Szwaczkowski T. (2016). Heritability of some meat quality traits in ducks. Scientific Annals of Polish Society of Animal Production, 12: 9-17.10.5604/01.3001.0013.5342 Search in Google Scholar

Grau R., Hamm R. (1952). A simple method for the determination of water absorption in the meat. Fleischwirtschaft, 4: 295-297. Search in Google Scholar

Hamm R. (1986). Functional properties of the myofibrillar system and their measurements. In: Muscle as Food, Bechtel P. J. (eds)., Academic Press, Orlando, USA: pp. 144. Search in Google Scholar

Huda N., Putra A. A., Ahmad R. (2011). Proximate and physicochemical property duck of Peking and Muscovy breasts and thighs for further processing. J. Food Agric. Environ., 9: 82-88. Search in Google Scholar

Ismoyowati I., Sumarmono J. (2019). Duck production for food security. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 372: 01207010.1088/1755-1315/372/1/012070 Search in Google Scholar

ISO 8586:2014-03 (2014). Sensory analysis – General guidelines for selection, training and monitoring for selected assessors and expert assessors. Search in Google Scholar

ISO 8589:2007 (2007). Sensory analysis – General guidance for the design of test rooms. Search in Google Scholar

Jukna V., Jukna C., Peciulaitiene N. (2012). Electrical conductivity of pig meat and its relation with quality. Vet. Med. Zoot., 57: 18-21. Search in Google Scholar

Kokoszyński D. (2011). Evaluation of meat traits in commercial crossbreds of Pekin type ducks Dissertations No 147. Publishing: the University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz: 113 pp. (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

Kokoszyński D., Kotowicz M., Brudnicki A., Bernacki Z., Wasilewski P. D., Wasilewski R. (2017). Carcass composition and quality of meat from Pekin ducks finished on diets with varying levels of whole wheat grain. Anim. Prod. Sci., 57: 2117-2124. Search in Google Scholar

Kokoszyński D., Piwczyński D., Arpášová H., Hrnčar C., Saleh M., Wasilewski R. (2019 a). A comparative study of carcass characteristics and meat quality in genetic resources Pekin ducks and commercial crossbreds. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci., 32: 1753-1762.10.5713/ajas.18.0790681778031011002 Search in Google Scholar

Kokoszyński D., Wasilewski R., Stęczny K., Kotowicz M., Hrnčar C., Arpášová H. (2019 b). Carcass composition and selected meat quality traits of Pekin ducks from genetic resources flocks. Poult. Sci., 98: 3029-3039.10.3382/ps/pez07330815686 Search in Google Scholar

Kowalska, E., Kucharska-Gaca, J., Kuźniacka, J., Biesek, J., Banaszak, M., Adamski, M. (2020). Effects of legume-diet and sex of ducks on the growth performance, physicochemical traits of meat and fatty acid composition in fat. Sci. Rep., 10(1): 1-12. Search in Google Scholar

Lacin, E., Aksu, M. I., Macit, M., Yildiz, A., Karaoglu, M., Esenbuga, N., Yoruk, M. A. (2008). Effects of different raising systems on colour and quality characteristics of Turkish Pekin duck meats. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 38(3): 217-223. Search in Google Scholar

Mancini R. P., Hunt M. C. (2005). Current research in meat color. Meat Sci., 71: 100-121. Search in Google Scholar

Michalczuk M., Damaziak K., Pietrzak D., Marzec A., Chmiel M., Adamczak L. (2016). Influence of housing system on selected quality characteristics of duck meat. Chapter 1. Pekin duck. Ann. Warsaw Univ. Life Sci. – SGGW, Anim. Sci., 55: 89-97. Search in Google Scholar

Okruszek A., Wołoszyn J., Książkiewicz J., Haraf G. (2006). The comparison of ducks’ meat quality of different flocks. Worlds Poult. Sci. J., 62: 444. Search in Google Scholar

Paustian M., Reinecke F. E., Theuvsen L. (2016). Consumer preferences for regional meat products. Brit. Food J., 118: 2761-2780. Search in Google Scholar

Pikul J. (1993). Technological assessment of raw materials and products of the poultry industry Publishing: Agricultural University in Poznań: 63-64. (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

Pohja, M. S, Niinivaara, F. P. (1957). The determination of water holding capacity of meat using constant pressure method. Fleischwirtschaft, 9: 193-195. Search in Google Scholar

PN-ISO 1442:2000. Meat and meat products – Determination of water content (reference method) (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

Rayan, G. N., Ali, A. M., Hassan, A. Z. (2020). Growth performance, carcass traits and economic efficiency of pekin ducks as affected by different raising protocols under hot climate. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 29: 11737-11747. Search in Google Scholar

Resurreccion A. V. A. (2004). Sensory aspects of consumer choices for meat and meat products. Meat Sci., 66: 11-20. Search in Google Scholar

Saelin S., Wattanachant S., Youravong W. (2017). Evaluation of water holding capacity in broiler breast meat by electrical conductivity. Int. Food Res. J., 24: 2593-2598. Search in Google Scholar

Sandercock D. A., Barker Z. E., Mitchell M. A., Hocking P. M. (2009). Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens. Genet. Sel. Evol. 41:1-8. Search in Google Scholar

Smith D., Fletcher D., Papa C. (1992). Post-mortem biochemistry of pekin duckling and broiler chicken pectoralis muscle. Poult. Sci., 71: 1768-1772. Search in Google Scholar

Smith d., Fletcher D., Buhr R., Beyer R. (1993). Pekin duckling and broiler chicken pectoralis muscle structure and composition. Poult. Sci., 72: 202-208. Search in Google Scholar

Solomon J., Austin R., Cumberbatch R., Gonsalves J., Seaforth E. (2006). A comparison of live weight and carcass gain of pekin, Kunshan and Muscovy ducks on a commercial ration. Livest. Res. Rural. Dev., 18,154. Search in Google Scholar

Troy D. J., Kerry, J. P. (2010). Consumer perception and the role of science in the meat industry. Meat Sci., 86 : 214-226. Search in Google Scholar

Warner R., Miller R., Ha M., Wheeler T. L., Dunshea F., Li X., Wheeler, T. (2021). Meat tenderness: Underlying mechanisms, instrumental measurement, and sensory assessment. Meat and Muscle Biology, 4 : 17-25. Search in Google Scholar

Witak B. (2008). Tissue composition of carcass, meat quality and fatty acid content of ducks of a commercial breeding line at different age. Arch. Tierz., 51: 266-275. Search in Google Scholar

Wołoszyn J., Książkiewicz J., Skrabka-Błotnicka T., Haraf G., Biernat J., Kisiel T. (2006). Comparison of amino acid and fatty acid composition of duck breast muscles from five flocks. Arch. Tierz. 49(2): 194-204. Search in Google Scholar

Wołoszyn J., Haraf G., Książkiewicz J., Okruszek A. (2009). Influence of genotype on duck meat colour. Med. Wet. 65: 836-839. Search in Google Scholar

Ziołecki J., Doruchowski W. (1989). Assessment method of the slaughter value of poultry. Publishing: COBRD, Poznań: 22 pp. (in Polish). Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo