[Agrawal H., Selokar N.L., Saini M., Singh M.K., Chauhan M.S., Palta P., Sin-gla S.K., Manik R.S. (2018). Epigenetic alteration of donor cells with histone deacetylase inhibitor m-carboxycinnamic acid bishydroxymide improves the in vitro developmental competence of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) cloned embryos. Cell. Reprogram., 20: 76-88.10.1089/cell.2017.0035]Search in Google Scholar
[Allegrucci C., Thurston A., Lucas E., Young L. (2005). Epigenetics and the germline. Reproduction, 129: 137-149.10.1530/rep.1.00360]Search in Google Scholar
[Anckaert E., Fair T. (2015). DNAmethylation reprogramming during oogenesis and interference by reproductive technologies: Studies in mouse and bovine models. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 27: 739-754.10.1071/RD14333]Search in Google Scholar
[Armstrong L.M., Lako W., Dean W., Stojkovic M. (2006). Epigenetic modification is central to genome reprogramming in somatic cell nuclear transfer. Stem Cells, 24: 805-814.10.1634/stemcells.2005-0350]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonk A.J., Cheong H.T., Li R., Lai L., Hao Y., Liu Z., Samuel M., Fergason E.A., Whitworth K.M., Murphy C.N., Antoniou E., Prather R.S. (2007). Correlation of developmental differences of nuclear transfer embryos cells to the methylation profiles of nuclear transfer donor cells in swine. Epigenetics, 2: 179-186.10.4161/epi.2.3.4844]Search in Google Scholar
[Bonk A.J., Li R., Lai L., Hao Y., Liu Z., Samuel M., Fergason E.A., Whitworth K.M., Murphy C.N., Antoniou E., Prather R.S. (2008). Aberrant DNAmethylation in porcine in vitro-, parthenogenetic-, and somatic cell nuclear transfer-produced blastocysts. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 75: 250-264.10.1002/mrd.20786]Search in Google Scholar
[Bortvin A., Eggan K ., Skaletsky H ., Akutsu H ., Berry D .L., Yanagimachi R ., Page D.C., Jaenisch R. (2003). Incomplete reactivation of Oct4-related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei. Development, 130: 1673-1680.10.1242/dev.00366]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowles E.J., Campbell K.H., St John J.C. (2007). Nuclear transfer: preservation ofanuclear genome at the expense of its associated mt DNAgenome(s). Curr. Top. Dev. Biol., 77: 251-290.10.1016/S0070-2153(06)77010-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Burgstaller J.P., Schinogl P., Dinnyes A., Müller M., Steinborn R. (2007). Mitochondrial DNAheteroplasmy in ovine fetuses and sheep cloned by somatic cell nuclear transfer. BMC Dev. Biol., 7: 141.10.1186/1471-213X-7-141]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell K.H., Alberio R. (2003). Reprogramming the genome: role of the cell cycle. Reprod. Suppl., 61: 477-494.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cezar G.G., Bartolomei M.S., Forsberg E.J., First N.L., Bishop M.D., Eilert -sen K.J. (2003). Genome-wide epigenetic alterations in cloned bovine fetuses. Biol. Reprod., 68: 1009-1014.10.1095/biolreprod.102.010181]Search in Google Scholar
[Chavatte-Palmer P., Heyman Y., Richard C., Monget P., Le Bourhis D., Kann G., Chilliard Y., Vignon X., Renard J.P. (2002). Clinical, hormonal, and hematologic characteristics of bovine calves derived from nuclei from somatic cells. Biol. Reprod., 66: 1596-1603.10.1095/biolreprod66.6.1596]Search in Google Scholar
[Corry G.N., Tanasijevic B., Barry E.R., Krueger W., Rasmussen T.P. (2009). Epigenetic regulatory mechanisms during preimplantation development. Birth Defects Res. C, 87: 297-313.10.1002/bdrc.20165]Search in Google Scholar
[Cui W., Wylie D., Aslam S., Dinnyes A., King T., Wilmut I., Clark A.J. (2003). Telomerase- immortalized sheep fibroblasts can be reprogrammed by nuclear transfer to undergo early development. Biol. Reprod., 69: 15-21.10.1095/biolreprod.102.013250]Search in Google Scholar
[Dean W., Santos F., Reik W. (2003). Epigenetic reprogramming in early mammalian development and following somatic nuclear transfer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 14: 93-100.10.1016/S1084-9521(02)00141-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Deshmukh R.S., Østrup O., Østrup E., Vejlsted M., Niemann H., Lucas- Hahn A., Petersen B., Li J., Callesen H., Hyttel P., (2011). DNAmethylation in porcine preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and produced by in vitro fertilization, parthenogenetic activation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Epigenetics, 6: 177-187.10.4161/epi.6.2.13519]Search in Google Scholar
[De Sousa P.A., King T., Harkness L., Young L.E., Walker S.K., Wilmut I. (2001). Evaluation of gestational deficiencies in cloned sheep fetuses and placentae. Biol. Reprod., 65: 23-30.10.1095/biolreprod65.1.23]Search in Google Scholar
[Dindot S.V., Farin P.W., Farin C.E., Romano J., Walker S., Long C., Piedrahita J.A. (2004). Epigenetic and genomic imprinting analysis in nuclear transfer derived Bos gaurus/Bos taurus hybrid fetuses. Biol. Reprod., 71: 470-478.10.1095/biolreprod.103.025775]Search in Google Scholar
[Eggan K., Akutsu H., Hochedlinger K., Rideout III W., Yanagimachi R., Jaen -isch R. (2000). X-chromosome inactivation in cloned mouse embryos. Science, 290: 1578-1581.10.1126/science.290.5496.1578]Search in Google Scholar
[Eilertsen K.J., Power R.A., Harkins L.L., Misica P. (2007). Targeting cellular memory to reprogram the epigenome, restore potential, and improve somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 98: 129-146.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.10.019]Search in Google Scholar
[Enright B.P., Kubota C., Yang X., Tian X.C. (2003). Epigenetic characteristics and development of embryos cloned from donor cells treated by trichostatin Aor 5-aza-2’-deoxycytidine. Biol. Reprod., 69: 896-901.10.1095/biolreprod.103.017954]Search in Google Scholar
[Esteves T.C., Balbach S.T., Pfeiffer M.J., Araúzo-Bravo M.J., Klein D.C., Sinn M., Boiani M. (2011). Somatic cell nuclear reprogramming of mouse oocytes endures beyond reproductive decline. Aging Cell, 10: 80-95.10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00644.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fernandez-Gonzales R., Moreira P., Bilbao A., Jimenez A., Perez- Crespo M., Ramirez M.A., De Fonseca F.R., Pintado B., Gutierrez- Adan A. (2004). Longterm effect of in vitro culture of mouse embryos with serum on m RNAexpression of imprinting genes, development, and behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101: 5880-5885.10.1073/pnas.0308560101]Search in Google Scholar
[Fournier C., Goto Y., Ballestar E., Delaval K., Hever A.M., Esteller M., Feil R. (2002). Allele-specific histone lysine methylation marks regulatory regions at imprinted mouse genes. EMBO J., 21: 6560-6570.10.1093/emboj/cdf655]Search in Google Scholar
[Han Y.M., Kang Y.K., Koo D.B., Lee K.K. (2003). Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology, 59: 33-44.10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01271-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Hiendleder S. (2007). Mitochondrial DNAinheritance after SCNT. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 591: 103-116.10.1007/978-0-387-37754-4_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Hiendleder S., Prelle K., Brüggerhoff K., Reichenbach H.D., Wenigerkind H., Bebbere D., Stojkovic M., Müller S., Brem G., Zakhartchenko V., Wolf E. (2004). Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions affect in utero developmental capacity, phenotype, and cellular metabolism of bovine nuclear transfer fetuses. Biol. Reprod., 70: 1196-1205.10.1095/biolreprod.103.023028]Search in Google Scholar
[Hill J.R., Schlafer D.H., Fisher P.J., Davies C.J. (2002). Abnormal expression of trophoblast major histocompatibility complex class Iantigens in cloned bovine pregnancies is associated with a pronounced endometrial lymphocytic response. Biol. Reprod., 67: 55-63.10.1095/biolreprod67.1.55]Search in Google Scholar
[Hossain M.M., Tesfaye D., Salilew- Wondim D., Held E., Pröll M.J., Rings F., Kir-fel G., Looft C., Tholen E., Uddin J., Schellander K., Hoelker M. (2014). Massive deregulation of mi RNAs from nuclear reprogramming errors during trophoblast differentiation for placentogenesis in cloned pregnancy. BMC Genomics, 15: 43.10.1186/1471-2164-15-43]Search in Google Scholar
[Hörmanseder E., Simeone A., Allen G.E., Bradshaw C.R., Figlmüller M., Gur-don J., Jullien J. (2017). H3K4 methylation-dependent memory of somatic cell identity inhibits reprogramming and development of nuclear transfer embryos. Cell Stem Cell, 21: 135-143.e6.10.1016/j.stem.2017.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang J., Zhang H., Yao J., Qin G., Wang F., Wang X., Luo A., Zheng Q., Cao C., Zhao J. (2016). BIX-01294 increases pig cloning efficiency by improving epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Reproduction, 151: 39-49.10.1530/REP-15-0460]Search in Google Scholar
[Inoue K., Kohda T., Lee J., Ogonuki N., Mochida K., Noguchi Y., Tanemura K., Kaneko-Ishino T., Ishino F., Ogura A. (2002). Faithful expression of imprinted genes in cloned mice. Science, 295: 297.10.1126/science.295.5553.297]Search in Google Scholar
[Iurlaro M.,von Meyenn F., Reik W. (2017). DNAmethylation homeostasis in human and mouse development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 43: 101-109.10.1016/j.gde.2017.02.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Jafarpour F., Hosseini S.M., Ostadhosseini S., Abbasi H., Dalman A., Nasr-Es -fahani M.H. (2017). Comparative dynamics of 5-methylcytosine reprogramming and TETfamily expression during preimplantation mammalian development in mouse and sheep. Theriogenology, 89: 86-96.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.10.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeon B.G., Coppola G., Perrault S.D., Rho G.J., Betts D.H., King W.A. (2008). S-adenosylhomocysteine treatment of adult female fibroblasts alters X-chromosome inactivation and improves in vitro embryo development after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reproduction, 135: 815-828.10.1530/REP-07-0442]Search in Google Scholar
[Jouneau A., Renard J.P. (2003). Reprogramming in nuclear transfer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 13: 486-491.10.1016/j.gde.2003.08.007]Search in Google Scholar
[Jullien J., Vodnala M., Pasque V., Oikawa M., Miyamoto K., Allen G., David S.A., Brochard V., Wang S., Bradshaw C., Koseki H., Sartorelli V., Beaujean N., Gurdon J. (2017). Gene resistance to transcriptional reprogramming following nuclear transfer is directly mediated by multiple chromatin-repressive pathways. Mol. Cell, 65: 873-884.e8.10.1016/j.molcel.2017.01.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang Y.K., Park J.S., Koo D.B., Choi Y.H., Kim S.U., Lee K.K., Han Y.M. (2002). Limited demethylation leaves mosaic-type methylation states in cloned bovine pre-implantation embryos. EMBO J., 21: 1092-1100.10.1093/emboj/21.5.1092]Search in Google Scholar
[Kang Y.K., Yeo S., Kim S.H., Koo D.B., Park J.S., Wee G., Han J.S., Oh K.B., Lee K.K., Han Y.M. (2003). Precise recapitulation of methylation change in early cloned embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 66: 32-37.10.1002/mrd.10330]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim J.M., Ogura A., Nagata M., Aoki F. (2002). Analysis of the mechanism for chromatin remodeling in embryos reconstructed by somatic nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod., 67: 760-766.10.1095/biolreprod.101.000612]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim S.H., Kang Y.K., Koo D.B., Kang M.J., Moon S.J., Lee K.K., Han Y.M. (2004). Differential DNAmethylation reprogramming of various repetitive sequences in mouse preimplantation embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 324: 58-63.10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.023]Search in Google Scholar
[Koike T., Wakai T., Jincho Y., Sakashita A., Kobayashi H., Mizutani E., Wakaya -ma S., Miura F., Ito T., Kono T. (2016). DNAmethylation errors in cloned mouse sperm by germ line barrier evasion. Biol. Reprod., 94: 1-7.10.1095/biolreprod.116.138677]Search in Google Scholar
[Koo D.B., Kang Y.K., Choi Y.H., Park J.S., Kim H.N., Oh K.B., Son D.S., Park H., Lee K.K., Han Y.M. (2002). Aberrant allocations of inner cell mass and trophectoderm cells in bovine nuclear transfer blastocysts. Biol. Reprod., 67: 487-492.10.1095/biolreprod67.2.487]Search in Google Scholar
[Kourmouli N., Jeppesen P., Mahadevhaiah S., Burgoyne P., Wu R., Gilbert D.M., Bongiorni S., Prantera G., Fanti L., Pimpinelli S., Shi W., Fundele R., Singh P.B. (2004). Heterochromatin and tri-methylated lysine 20 of histone H4 in animals. J. Cell Sci., 117: 2491-2501.10.1242/jcs.01238]Search in Google Scholar
[Kungulovski G., Jeltsch A. (2016). Epigenome editing: state of the art, concepts, and perspectives. Trends Genet., 32: 101-113.10.1016/j.tig.2015.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee J., Inoue K., Ono R., Ogonuki N., Kohda T., Kaneko-Ishino T., Ogura A., Ishino F. (2003). Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development, 129: 1807-1817.10.1242/dev.129.8.1807]Search in Google Scholar
[Liao H.F., Mo C.F., Wu S.C., Cheng D.H., Yu C.Y., Chang K.W., Kao T.H., Lu C.W., Pin-skaya M., Morillon A., Lin S.S., Cheng W.T., Bourc'his D., Bestor T., Sung L.Y., Lin S.P. (2015). Dnmt3l-knockout donor cells improve somatic cell nuclear transfer reprogramming efficiency. Reproduction, 150: 245-256.10.1530/REP-15-0031]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu H., Kim J.M., Aoki F. (2004). Regulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in oocytes and early preimplantation embryos. Development, 131: 2269-2280.10.1242/dev.01116]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu X., Wang Y., Gao Y., Su J., Zhang J., Xing X., Zhou C., Yao K., An Q., Zhang Y. (2018). H3K9 demethylase KDM4Eis an epigenetic regulator for bovine embryonic development andadefective factor for nuclear reprogramming. Development, 145: dev158261.10.1242/dev.158261]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorincz M.C., Schubeler D., Hutchinson S.R., Dickerson D.R., Groudine M. (2002). DNAmethylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and Dnmt3a/bindependent de novo methylation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 22: 7572-7580.10.1128/MCB.22.21.7572-7580.2002]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorthongpanich C., Solter D., Lim C.Y. (2010). Nuclear reprogramming in zygotes. Int. J. Dev. Biol., 54: 1631-1640.10.1387/ijdb.103201cl]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucifero D., Mertineit C., Clarke H.J., Bestor T.H., Trasler J.M. (2002). Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells. Genomics, 79: 530-538.10.1006/geno.2002.6732]Search in Google Scholar
[Lucifero D., Chaillet J.R., Trasler J.M. (2004). Potential significance of genomic imprinting defects for reproduction and assisted reproductive technology. Hum. Reprod., 10: 3-18.10.1093/humupd/dmh002]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma P.J., Zhang H., Li R., Wang Y.S., Zhang Y., Hua S. (2015). P53-mediated repression of the reprogramming in cloned bovine embryos through direct interaction with HDAC1 and indirect interaction with DNMT3A. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 50: 400-409.10.1111/rda.12502]Search in Google Scholar
[Mann M.R.W., Bartolomei M.S. (2002). Epigenetic reprogramming in the mammalian embryo: struggle of the clones. Genome Biol., 3: reviews1003.1-reviews1003.4.10.1186/gb-2002-3-2-reviews1003]Search in Google Scholar
[Mann M.R.W., Chung Y.G., Nolen L.D., Verona R.I., Latham K.E., Bartolomei M.S. (2003). Disruption of imprinted gene methylation and expression in cloned preimplantation stage mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod., 69: 902-914.10.1095/biolreprod.103.017293]Search in Google Scholar
[Mann M.R.W., Lee S.S., Doherty A.S., Verona R.I., Nolen L.D., Schultz R.M., Bar-tolomei M.S. (2004). Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development, 131: 3727-3735.10.1242/dev.01241]Search in Google Scholar
[Masala L., Burrai G.P., Bellu E., Ariu F., Bogliolo L., Ledda S., Bebbere D. (2017). Methylation dynamics during folliculogenesis and early embryo development in sheep. Reproduction, 153: 605-619.10.1530/REP-16-0644]Search in Google Scholar
[Miki H., Inoue K., Kohda T., Honda A., Ogonuki N., Yuzuriha M., Mise N., Ma -tsui Y., Baba T., Abe K., Ishino F., Ogura A. (2005). Birth of mice produced by germ cell nuclear transfer. Genesis, 41: 81-86.10.1002/gene.20100]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreira P.N., Robl J.M., Collas P. (2003). Architectural defects in pronuclei of mouse nuclear transplant embryos. J. Cell Sci., 116: 3713-3720.10.1242/jcs.00692]Search in Google Scholar
[Narbonne P., Miyamoto K., Gurdon J.B. (2012). Reprogramming and development in nuclear transfer embryos and in interspecific systems. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 22: 450-458.10.1016/j.gde.2012.09.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Novak S., Paradis F., Savard C., Tremblay K., Sirard M.A. (2004). Identification of porcine oocyte proteins that are associated with somatic cell nuclei after co-incubation. Biol. Reprod., 71: 1279-1289.10.1095/biolreprod.103.027037]Search in Google Scholar
[Obata Y., Kono T. (2002). Maternal primary imprinting is established ataspecific time for each gene throughout oocyte growth. J. Biol. Chem., 277: 5285-5289.10.1074/jbc.M108586200]Search in Google Scholar
[Ogawa H., Ono Y., Shimozawa N., Sotomaru Y., Katsuzawa Y., Hiura H., Ito M., Kono T. (2003). Disruption of imprinting in cloned mouse fetuses from embryonic stem cells. Reproduction, 126: 549-557.10.1530/rep.0.1260549]Search in Google Scholar
[Paoloni-Giacobino A., Chaillet J.R. (2004). Genomic imprinting and assisted reproduction. Reprod. Health, 1: 6.10.1186/1742-4755-1-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Park K.Y., Sellars E.A., Grinberg A., Huang S.P., Pfeifer K. (2004). The H19 differentially methylated region marks the parental origin ofaheterologous locus without gametic DNA methylation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 24: 3588-3595.10.1128/MCB.24.9.3588-3595.2004]Search in Google Scholar
[Park M.R., Cho S.K., Lee S.Y., Choi Y.J., Park J.Y., Kwon D.N., Son W.J., Paik S.S., Kim T., Han Y.M., Kim J.H. (2005). Arare and often unrecognized cerebromeningitis and hemodynamic disorder: Amajor cause of sudden death in somatic cell cloned piglets. Proteomics, 5: 1928-1939.10.1002/pmic.200401079]Search in Google Scholar
[Pfister-Genskow M., Myers C., Childs L.A., Lacson J.C., Patterson T., Betthau-ser J.M., Goueleke P.J., Koppang R.W., Lange G., Fisher P., Watt S.R., Fors -berg E.J., Zheng Y., Leno G.H., Schultz R.M., Liu B., Chetia C., Yang X., Hoe-schele I., Eilertsen K.J. (2005). Identification of differentially expressed genes in individual bovine preimplantation embryos produced by nuclear transfer: improper reprogramming of genes required for development. Biol. Reprod., 72: 546-555.10.1095/biolreprod.104.031799]Search in Google Scholar
[Prather R.S., Ross J.W., Isom S.C., Green J.A. (2009). Transcriptional, posttranscriptional and epigenetic control of porcine oocyte maturation and embryogenesis. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl., 66: 165-176.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prokopuk L., Stringer J.M., Hogg K., Elgass K.D., Western P.S. (2017). PRC2 is required for extensive reorganization of H3K27me3 during epigenetic reprogramming in mouse fetal germ cells. Epigenetics Chromatin, 10: 7.10.1186/s13072-017-0113-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Reik W. (2007). Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development. Nature, 447: 425-432.10.1038/nature05918]Search in Google Scholar
[Reik W., Santos F., Dean W. (2003 a). Mammalian epigenomics: reprogramming the genome for development and therapy. Theriogenology, 59: 21-32.10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01269-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Reik W., Santos F., Mitsuya K., Morgan H., Dean W. (2003 b). Epigenetic asymmetry in the mammalian zygote and early embryo: relationship to lineage commitment? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci., 358: 1403-1409.10.1098/rstb.2003.1326169323814511488]Search in Google Scholar
[Renard J.P., Zhou Q., Le Bourhis D., Chavatte-Palmer P., Hue I., Heyman Y., Vignon X. (2002). Nuclear transfer technologies: between successes and doubts. Theriogenology, 57: 203-222.10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00667-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodriguez-Osorio N., Urrego R., Cibelli J.B., Eilertsen K., Memili E. (2012). Reprogramming mammalian somatic cells. Theriogenology, 78: 1869-1886.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.05.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Ruddock N.T., Wilson K.J., Cooney M.A., Korfiatis N.A., Tecirlioglu R.T., French A.J. (2004). Analysis of imprinted messenger RNAexpression during bovine preimplantation development. Biol. Reprod., 70: 1131-1135.10.1095/biolreprod.103.022236]Search in Google Scholar
[Samiec M. (2005). The effect of mitochondrial genome on architectural remodeling and epigenetic reprogramming of donor cell nuclei in mammalian nuclear transfer-derived embryos. J. Anim. Feed Sci., 14: 393-422.10.22358/jafs/67034/2005]Search in Google Scholar
[Samiec M., Skrzyszowska M. (2005). Molecular conditions of the cell nucleus remodelling/reprogramming process and nuclear-transferred embryo development in the intraooplasmic karyoplast injection technique:areview. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 185-195.10.17221/4142-CJAS]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos F., Zakhartchenko V., Stojkovic M., Peters A., Jenuwein T., Wolf E., Reik W., Dean W. (2003). Epigenetic marking correlates with developmental potential in cloned bovine preimplantation embryos. Curr. Biol., 13: 1116-1121.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00419-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Santos F., Dean W. (2004). Epigenetic reprogramming during early development in mammals. Reproduction, 127: 643-651.10.1530/rep.1.00221]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarmento O.F., Digilio L.C., Wang Y., Perlin J., Herr J.C., Allis C.D., Coonrod S.A. (2004). Dynamic alterations of specific histone modifications during early murine development. J. Cell Sci., 117: 4449-4459.10.1242/jcs.01328]Search in Google Scholar
[Seki Y., Hayashi K., Itoh K., Mizugaki M., Saitou M., Matsui Y. (2005). Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol., 278: 440-458.10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Selokar N.L., Saini M., Agrawal H., Palta P., Chauhan M.S., Manik R., Singla S.K. (2015). Downregulation of DNAmethyltransferase 1 in zona-free cloned buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos by small interefering RNAimproves in vitro development but does not alter DNAmethylation level. Cell. Reprogram., 17: 89-94.10.1089/cell.2014.0056]Search in Google Scholar
[Sepulveda- Rincon L.P., Solanas Edel L., Serrano- Revuelta E., Ruddick L., Maalouf W.E., Beaujean N. (2016). Early epigenetic reprogramming in fertilized, cloned, and parthenogenetic embryos. Theriogenology, 86: 91-98.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.04.022]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi L., Wu J. (2009). Epigenetic regulation in mammalian preimplantation embryo development. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol., 7: 59.10.1186/1477-7827-7-59]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi W., Zakhartchenko V., Wolf E. (2003 a). Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian nuclear transfer. Differentiation, 71: 91-113.10.1046/j.1432-0436.2003.710201.x12641564]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi W., Hoeflich A., Flaswinkel H., Stojkovic M., Wolf E., Zakhartchenko V. (2003 b). Induction ofasenescent-like phenotype does not confer the ability of bovine immortal cells to support the development of nuclear transfer embryos. Biol. Reprod., 69: 301-309.10.1095/biolreprod.102.01211212646489]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi W., Dirim F., Wolf E., Zakhartchenko V., Haaf T. (2004). Methylation reprogramming and chromosomal aneuploidy in in vivo fertilized and cloned rabbit preimplantation embryos. Biol. Reprod., 71: 340-347.10.1095/biolreprod.103.024554]Search in Google Scholar
[Sim B.W., Park C.W., Kang M.H., Min KS. (2017). Abnormal gene expression in regular and aggregated somatic cell nuclear transfer placentas. BMC Biotechnol., 17: 34.10.1186/s12896-017-0355-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Simonsson S., Gurdon J. (2004). DNAdemethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat. Cell Biol., 6: 984-990.10.1038/ncb1176]Search in Google Scholar
[Srirattana K., Matsukawa K., Akagi S., Tasai M., Tagami T., Nirasawa K., Na -gai T., Kanai Y., Parnpai R., Takeda K. (2011). Constant transmission of mitochondrial DNAin intergeneric cloned embryos reconstructed from swamp buffalo fibroblasts and bovine ooplasm. Anim. Sci. J., 82: 236-243.10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00827.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Srivastava M., Frolova E., Rottinghaus B., Boe S.P., Grinberg A., Lee E., Love P.E., Pfeifer K. (2003). Imprint control element-mediated secondary methylation imprints at the Igf2/H19 locus. J. Biol. Chem., 278: 5977-5983.10.1074/jbc.M208437200]Search in Google Scholar
[Vignon X., Zhou Q., Renard J.P. (2002). Chromatin asaregulative architecture of the early developmental functions of mammalian embryos after fertilization or nuclear transfer. Cloning Stem Cells, 4: 363-377.10.1089/153623002321025041]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang Y., Su J., Wang L., Xu W., Quan F., Liu J., Zhang Y. (2011). The effects of 5-aza-2'- deoxycytidine and trichostatin Aon gene expression and DNAmethylation status in cloned bovine blastocysts. Cell. Reprogram., 13: 297-306.10.1089/cell.2010.0098]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang H., Cui W., Meng C., Zhang J., Li Y., Qian Y., Xing G., Zhao D., Cao S. (2018). MC1568 enhances histone acetylation during oocyte meiosis and improves development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pig. Cell. Reprogram., 20: 55-65.10.1089/cell.2017.0023]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitworth K.M., Prather R.S. (2010). Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: How can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming? Mol. Reprod. Dev., 77: 1001-1015.10.1002/mrd.21242]Search in Google Scholar
[Wrenzycki C., Lucas- Hahn A., Herrmann D., Lemme E., Korsawe K., Nie-mann H. (2002). In vitro production and nuclear transfer affect dosage compensation of the X-linked gene transcripts G6PD, PGK, and Xist in preimplantation bovine embryos. Biol. Reprod., 66: 127-134.10.1095/biolreprod66.1.127]Search in Google Scholar
[Wrenzycki C., Niemann H. (2003). Epigenetic reprogramming in early embryonic development: effects of in-vitro production and somatic nuclear transfer. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 7: 649-656.10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62087-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Xie B., Zhang H., Wei R., Li Q., Weng X., Kong Q., Liu Z. (2016). Histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation acts as an epigenetic barrier in porcine nuclear reprogramming. Reproduction, 151: 9-16.10.1530/REP-15-0338]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamanaka K., Sugimura S., Wakai T., Kawahara M., Sato E. (2009). Acetylation level of histone H3 in early embryonic stages affects subsequent development of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. J. Reprod. Dev., 55: 638-644.10.1262/jrd.20245]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamazaki Y., Mellissa R., Mann M.R.W., Lee S.S., Marh J., Mc Carrey J.R., Yanagi -machi R., Bartolomei M.S. (2003). Reprogramming of primordial germ cells begins before migration into the genital ridge, making these cells inadequate donors for reproductive cloning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100: 12207-12212.10.1073/pnas.2035119100]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan Z.H., Zhou Y.Y., Fu J., Jiao F., Zhao L.W., Guan P.F., Huang S.Z., Zeng Y.T., Zeng F. (2010). Donor-host mitochondrial compatibility improves efficiency of bovine somatic cell nuclear transfer. BMC Dev. Biol., 10: 31.10.1186/1471-213X-10-31]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan H., Yan Z., Ma Q., Jiao F., Huang S., Zeng F., Zeng Y. (2011). Association between mitochondrial DNAhaplotype compatibility and increased efficiency of bovine intersubspecies cloning. J. Genet. Genomics, 38: 21-28.10.1016/j.jcg.2010.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang X., Smith S.L., Tian X.C., Lewin H.A., Renard J.P., Wakayama T. (2007). Nuclear reprogramming of cloned embryos and its implications for therapeutic cloning. Nat. Genet., 39: 295-302.10.1038/ng1973]Search in Google Scholar
[Young L.E., Schnieke A.E., Mc Creath K.J., Wieckowski S., Konfortova G., Fer-nandes K., Ptak G., Kind A.J., Wilmut I., Loi P., Feil R. (2003). Conservation of IGF2- H19 and IGF2Rimprinting in sheep: effects of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Mech. Dev., 120: 1433-1442.10.1016/j.mod.2003.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang X., Wang D., Han Y., Duan F., Lv Q., Li Z. (2014). Altered imprinted gene expression and methylation patterns in mid-gestation aborted cloned porcine fetuses and placentas. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 31: 1511-1517.10.1007/s10815-014-0320-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang Z., Zhai Y., Ma X., Zhang S., An X., Yu H., Li Z. (2018). Down-regulation of H3K- 4me3 by MM-102 facilitates epigenetic reprogramming of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Cell. Physiol. Biochem., 45: 1529-1540.10.1159/000487579]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhao J., Whyte J., Prather R.S. (2010). Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer. Cell Tissue Res., 341: 13-21.10.1007/s00441-010-1000-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Zuo Y., Su G., Cheng L., Liu K., Feng Y., Wei Z., Bai C., Cao G., Li G. (2017). Coexpression analysis identifies nuclear reprogramming barriers of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Oncotarget, 8: 65847-65859.10.18632/oncotarget.19504]Search in Google Scholar