1. bookVolume 60 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Estimation of radiation doses for transition from emergency to existing exposure situation

Published Online: 30 Dec 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 60 (2015) - Issue 4 (December 2015)
Page range: 943 - 950
Received: 19 Aug 2013
Accepted: 24 Oct 2014
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1508-5791
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The transition from emergency to existing exposure situation is an important stage in the nuclear or radiological emergency plan. It requires arrangements to be put in place and to be implemented so as to ensure that the transition is made in a coordinated and orderly manner of guidelines for adjusting the undertaken protective actions and other response actions. The delivering radiation doses to public and environmental pollution are monitoring that measurements should be implemented according to certain plan of intervention and protective actions in the different stages of the N/R accident. In this study, a computer model (RASCAL) is used to calculate the effect of severe accident could have detected on an operating nuclear power reactor PWR and the possible impact on the public. Features for the decision to implement the transition from emergency to existing exposure situation are proposed depending on the estimation of the collection of deliver exposure doses to the public and environment due to monitoring the different radiation sources resulting from the N/R accident.

Keywords

1. Diaz Maurin, F. (2011). Fukushima: Consequences of systemic problems in nuclear plant design. Economic & Political Weekly (Mumbai), 46(13), 10-12. http://epw.in/epw/uploads/articles/15865.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

2. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2009). Application of the Commission’s recommendations for the protection of people in emergency exposure situations. (ICRP Publication 109). Ann. ICRP, 39(1).Search in Google Scholar

3. Working Group Special Committee on Nuclear Disaster. (2012). Interim report for reviewing. Regulatory guide: Emergency preparedness for nuclear facilities, nuclear safety commission emergency preparedness guidelines.Search in Google Scholar

4. U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2012, March). RASCAL 4: Description of models and methods. Washington, DC: Offi ce of Nuclear Security and Incident Response. (20555-0001).Search in Google Scholar

5. A European manual. (2002). Off-site emergency planning and response to nuclear accidents.Search in Google Scholar

6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991). Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (Publication 60). Oxford: Pergamom Press.Search in Google Scholar

7. Jensen, P. H. (2012). Justification, optimization and decision - aiding in existing exposure situations. Section of Applied Health Physics, Risø National Laboratory, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

8. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1996). International basic safety standards for protection against radiation and for the safety of radiation sources. Vienna: IAEA. (Safety Series No. 115).Search in Google Scholar

9. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (2002, January). Modeling potential reactor accident consequences. (NUREG/BR-0359).Search in Google Scholar

10. International Atomic Energy Agency. (1997). Generic assessment procedures for determining protective actions during a reactor accident. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-TECDOC-955).Search in Google Scholar

11. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2002). Safety requirements in emergency preparedness and response. Vienna: IAEA. (IAEA-SR-GS-R-2).Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo