1. bookVolume 20 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Transactional Distance Dialogic Interactions and Student Satisfaction in a Multi-Institutional Blended Learning Environment

Published Online: 23 Jan 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 20 (2017) - Issue 1 (June 2017)
Page range: 139 - 153
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This study explored the impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student satisfaction in an international blended learning master’s degree program. The program examined was collaboratively delivered by three European universities to a cohort of students residing on several different continents. Students reported experiencing transactional distance for learnerlearner and learner-teacher dialogic interaction elements and dissatisfaction in the online components of the program but reported a sense of community and satisfaction for the inperson elements of the program. Transactional distance for the dimension of learner-content dialogic interaction was highest for elements of the program that were impacted by its multiinstitutional nature, but students reported general satisfaction for the program overall. This study has practical implications for distance educators, administrators, instructional designers, and policy makers concerned with student satisfaction in blended courses and programs, and it contributes to the literature on student satisfaction and multi-institutional programs.

Keywords

1. Bernath, U., & Rubin, E. (2002). Reflections on teaching and learning in an online master program. Oldenburg: BIS-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bischoff, W., Bisconer, S., Kooker, B., & Woods, L. (1996). Transactional distance and interactive television in the distance education of health professionals. The American Journal of Distance Education, 10(3), 4-19.10.1080/08923649609526937Search in Google Scholar

3. Bothwell, E. (2016, November 10). US blended learning students ‘least engaged with teaching’. Times Higher Education [blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/us-blended-learning-students-least-engagedteachingSearch in Google Scholar

4. Chen, Y., & Willits, F. (1999). A path analysis of the concepts in Moore’s theory of transactional distance in a videoconferencing learning environment. Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 45-59.10.1080/08923649909527013Search in Google Scholar

5. Chen, Y. (2001a). Transactional distance in World Wide Web learning environments: A factor analysis. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(4), 327-338.10.1080/14703290110074533Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Chen, Y. (2001b). Dimensions of transactional distance in the World Wide Web learning environment: A factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 459-470.10.1111/1467-8535.00213Search in Google Scholar

7. Congress, A. (2015). A study of instructional strategies and their affects on transactional distance in online learning environments. (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).Search in Google Scholar

8. Goel, L., Zhang, P., & Templeton, M. (2012). Transactional distance revisited: Bridging face and empirical validity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1122-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.020.Search in Google Scholar

9. Grosjean, G., & Sork, T. J. (2007). Going online: Uploading learning to the virtual classroom. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007(113), 13-24.10.1002/ace.243Search in Google Scholar

10. Ekwunife-Orakwue, K. C., & Teng, T.L. (2014). The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Computers & Education, 78, 414-427.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011Search in Google Scholar

11. Fullwood, E. D. (2015). Influence of the use of online communications media on perceptions of transactional distance and student satisfaction in a hybrid education program. Doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.Search in Google Scholar

12. Horzum, M. (2011). Developing transactional distance scale and examining transactional distance perception of blended learning students in terms of different variables. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1582-1587.Search in Google Scholar

13. Jung, L, Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(2), 153-162.10.1080/14703290252934603Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Kassandrinou, A., Angelaki, C. & Mavroidis, I. (2014). Transactional distance among open university students: How does it affect the learning process? European Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 17(1), 26-42.10.2478/eurodl-2014-0002Search in Google Scholar

15. Larsson, S., Boud, D., Abrandt Dahlgren, M., Walters, S., & Sork, T. (2005). Confronting globalisation: Learning from intercontinental collaboration. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(1), 61-71.10.1080/14703290500048960Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Lewis, J. L. M. (2011). The Computer Ate My Classroom: Assessing Student Interactions, Perceived Learning, and Satisfaction in Online Community College Career Technical Education Courses. The University of Southern Mississippi, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

17. Mbwesa, J. K. (2014). Transactional distance as a predictor of perceived learner satisfaction in distance learning courses: A case study of bachelor of education arts program, University of Nairobi, Kenya. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 176-188. doi: 10.11114/jets.v2i2.291Search in Google Scholar

18. Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

19. Moore, M. G. (1999). Editorial: Institutional restructuring: Is distance education like retailing? The American Journal of Distance Education,13(1), 17.10.1080/08923649909527010Search in Google Scholar

20. Smith, S., Smith, S., & Boone, R. (2000). Increasing access to teacher preparation: The effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Journal of Special Education Technology, 15(2), 37-46.10.1177/016264340001500204Search in Google Scholar

21. Strachota, E. (2003). Student satisfaction in online courses: An analysis of the impact of learner-content, learner-instructor, learner-learner, and learner-technology interaction. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Ann-Arbor, Michigan: UMI Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

22. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22, 306-331.10.1080/0158791010220208Search in Google Scholar

23. Wengrowicz, N., & Offir, B. (2013). Teachers’ Perceptions of Transactional Distance in Different Teaching Environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 27(2), 111-121. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923647.2013.77370110.1080/08923647.2013.773701Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Wengrowicz, N., Dori, Y.J., & Dori, D. (2014). Transactional distance in an undergraduate project-based systems modelling course. Knowledge-Based Systems, 71, 41-51.10.1016/j.knosys.2014.05.022Search in Google Scholar

25. Xiaoxia, H., Aruna, C., DePaolo, C., Cribbs, J., & Simmons, L. (2015). Measuring transactional distance in web-based learning environments: An initial instrument development. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance, and e-Learning, 30(2), 106-126. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2015.1065720Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhang, A. (2003). Transactional distance in web-based college learning environments: Toward measurement and theory construction. PhD thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo