Open Access

User Preferences of Perspective and Dimensionality of Tourism Space Geovisualisation Supporting Orientation in a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality

Alina Zajadacz

Alina Zajadacz

Chair of Tourism and Recreation, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań UniversityPoznań, Poland
Orcid profile
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Zajadacz, Alina
 and 
Łukasz Halik

Łukasz Halik

Department of Cartography and Geomatics, Faculty of Geographical and Geological Sciences, Adam Mickiewicz University in PoznańPoznań, Poland
Orcid profile
Search for this author on
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Halik, Łukasz
  
Aug 12, 2024
User Preferences of Perspective and Dimensionality of Tourism Space Geovisualisation Supporting Orientation in a Non-Immersive Virtual Reality's Cover Image
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Cite
Download Cover
Published Online: Aug 12, 2024
Page range: 77 - 86
Received: Jul 19, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/quageo-2024-0027
Keywords
© 2024 Alina Zajadacz et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Fig. 1.

Three variations of reference frames. Left: No reference frame. Middle: Egocentric reference frame or simulated Computer Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE). Right: Allocentric reference frame or simulated room according to Nguyen-Vo et al. (2017, p. 207).
Three variations of reference frames. Left: No reference frame. Middle: Egocentric reference frame or simulated Computer Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE). Right: Allocentric reference frame or simulated room according to Nguyen-Vo et al. (2017, p. 207).

Fig. 2.

Six plans for a large-scale building subjected to a user preference survey. A) 2D plan of the building in passerby perspective, B) 2D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, C) 2D plan of the building in top-down view perspective, D) 3D plan of the building in passerby perspective, E) 3D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, F) 3D plan of the building in top-down view perspective.
Six plans for a large-scale building subjected to a user preference survey. A) 2D plan of the building in passerby perspective, B) 2D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, C) 2D plan of the building in top-down view perspective, D) 3D plan of the building in passerby perspective, E) 3D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, F) 3D plan of the building in top-down view perspective.

Fig. 3.

Experimental setup.
Experimental setup.

Fig. 4.

The preferences of the respondents regarding the presentation perspective in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.
The preferences of the respondents regarding the presentation perspective in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.

Fig. 5.

The preferences of the respondents regarding the dimensionality of the presentation in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.
The preferences of the respondents regarding the dimensionality of the presentation in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.

Fig. 6.

Preferences in terms of plans, including independent variables (gender and Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests results).
Preferences in terms of plans, including independent variables (gender and Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests results).
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Geosciences, Geography
Journal RSS Feed