This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.
Three variations of reference frames. Left: No reference frame. Middle: Egocentric reference frame or simulated Computer Automated Virtual Environment (CAVE). Right: Allocentric reference frame or simulated room according to Nguyen-Vo et al. (2017, p. 207).
Fig. 2.
Six plans for a large-scale building subjected to a user preference survey. A) 2D plan of the building in passerby perspective, B) 2D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, C) 2D plan of the building in top-down view perspective, D) 3D plan of the building in passerby perspective, E) 3D plan of the building in bird-eye view perspective, F) 3D plan of the building in top-down view perspective.
Fig. 3.
Experimental setup.
Fig. 4.
The preferences of the respondents regarding the presentation perspective in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.
Fig. 5.
The preferences of the respondents regarding the dimensionality of the presentation in terms of gender and the results of the Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests.
Fig. 6.
Preferences in terms of plans, including independent variables (gender and Santa Barbara Sense of Direction and mental rotation tests results).