This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bularga A, Saraste A, Fontes-Carvalho R, Holte E, Cameli M, Michalski B, et al. EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Hear J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa300BulargaASarasteAFontes-CarvalhoRHolteECameliMMichalskiBEACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes2021Jan122117Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa30010.1093/ehjci/jeaa300Search in Google Scholar
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425KnuutiJWijnsWSarasteACapodannoDBarbatoEFunck-BrentanoC2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)2020Jan1441340777Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz42510.15829/1560-4071-2020-2-3757Search in Google Scholar
E. AA, Jeanette S-M, Daniel B, Heiko M, Yuchi H, Patricia BW, et al. Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 29;76(13):1536–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060E. AAJeanetteS-MDanielBHeikoMYuchiHPatriciaBWGadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease2020Sep297613153647Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.06010.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060Search in Google Scholar
Greenwood JP, Younger JF, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU, Ball SG, Plein S. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1363–8.GreenwoodJPYoungerJFRidgwayJPSivananthanMUBallSGPleinSSafety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction2007Nov93111363810.1136/hrt.2006.106427Search in Google Scholar
Vincenti G, Masci PG, Monney P, Rutz T, Hugelshofer S, Gaxherri M, et al. Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2017;10(5):526–37. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X17301894VincentiGMasciPGMonneyPRutzTHugelshoferSGaxherriMStress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization201710552637Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X1730189410.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.006Search in Google Scholar
Schwitter J, Wacker C, van Rossum A, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multi-vendor, randomized trial. Eur Hear J. 2008;29.SchwitterJWackerCvan RossumALombardiMAl-SaadiNAhlstromHMR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multi-vendor, randomized trial20082910.1093/eurheartj/ehm617Search in Google Scholar
Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative. Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(10):775–81.SchwitterJWackerCMWilkeNAl-SaadiNSauerEHuettleKMR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative2013Mar34107758110.1093/eurheartj/ehs022Search in Google Scholar
Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2012 Feb;379(9814):453–60. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673611613354GreenwoodJPMarediaNYoungerJFBrownJMNixonJEverettCCCardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial2012Feb379981445360Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S014067361161335410.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4Search in Google Scholar
Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, Bettencourt N, Shah AM, Hussain ST, et al. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2019 Jun 19;380(25):2418–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716734NagelEGreenwoodJPMcCannGPBettencourtNShahAMHussainSTMagnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease2019Jun1938025241828Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa171673410.1056/NEJMoa171673431216398Search in Google Scholar
Onciul S, Plein S. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease – a practical approach. Rom J Cardiol. 2017;27(4):490–8.OnciulSPleinSCardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease – a practical approach20172744908Search in Google Scholar
Hendel RC, Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Zemmrich C, Bengel F, Berman DS, et al. CMR First-Pass Perfusion for Suspected Inducible Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov; 9(11):1338–48.HendelRCFriedrichMGSchulz-MengerJZemmrichCBengelFBermanDSCMR First-Pass Perfusion for Suspected Inducible Myocardial Ischemia2016Nov91113384810.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.01027832901Search in Google Scholar
Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2020;22(1):17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1KramerCMBarkhausenJBucciarelli-DucciCFlammSDKimRJNagelEStandardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update202022117Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-110.1186/s12968-020-00607-1703861132089132Search in Google Scholar
Patriki D, von Felten E, Bakula A, Giannopoulos AA, Kamani CH, Schwyzer M, et al. Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2021;23(1):3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00696-yPatrikiDvon FeltenEBakulaAGiannopoulosAAKamaniCHSchwyzerMSplenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner20212313Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y778958133407586Search in Google Scholar
Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017 Feb 17;376(8):755–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603265RussoRJCostaHSSilvaPDAndersonJLArshadABiedermanRWWAssessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator2017Feb17376875564Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa160326510.1056/NEJMoa160326528225684Search in Google Scholar
Onciul S, Nicolaescu R, Predescu L, Capsa R, Vatasescu RG. Update on MRI safety in patients with stents, prosthetic heart valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Rom J Cardiol. 2019; 29(3):471–7.OnciulSNicolaescuRPredescuLCapsaRVatasescuRGUpdate on MRI safety in patients with stents, prosthetic heart valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices20192934717Search in Google Scholar
Hong K, Collins JD, Knight BP, Carr JC, Lee DC, Kim D. Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2018/09/09. 2019 Feb;81(2):1219–28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30229560.HongKCollinsJDKnightBPCarrJCLeeDCKimDWideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device2018/09/09.2019Feb812121928Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30229560.10.1002/mrm.27458628984730229560Search in Google Scholar