Stress perfusion CMR – a report of an initial Romanian experience

1 Bularga A, Saraste A, Fontes-Carvalho R, Holte E, Cameli M, Michalski B, et al. EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Hear J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1;22(1):1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa300 BulargaA SarasteA Fontes-CarvalhoR HolteE CameliM MichalskiB EACVI survey on investigations and imaging modalities in chronic coronary syndromes Eur Hear J - Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet] 2021 Jan 1 22 1 1 7 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaa300 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa300 Search in Google Scholar

2 Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J [Internet]. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 KnuutiJ WijnsW SarasteA CapodannoD BarbatoE Funck-BrentanoC 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes: The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur Heart J [Internet] 2020 Jan 14 41 3 407 77 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-2-3757 Search in Google Scholar

3 E. AA, Jeanette S-M, Daniel B, Heiko M, Yuchi H, Patricia BW, et al. Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2020 Sep 29;76(13):1536–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060 E. AA JeanetteS-M DanielB HeikoM YuchiH PatriciaBW Gadobutrol-Enhanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet] 2020 Sep 29 76 13 1536 47 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.060 Search in Google Scholar

4 Greenwood JP, Younger JF, Ridgway JP, Sivananthan MU, Ball SG, Plein S. Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2007 Nov;93(11):1363–8. GreenwoodJP YoungerJF RidgwayJP SivananthanMU BallSG PleinS Safety and diagnostic accuracy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging vs exercise tolerance testing early after acute ST elevation myocardial infarction Heart 2007 Nov 93 11 1363 8 10.1136/hrt.2006.106427 Search in Google Scholar

5 Vincenti G, Masci PG, Monney P, Rutz T, Hugelshofer S, Gaxherri M, et al. Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet]. 2017;10(5):526–37. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X17301894 VincentiG MasciPG MonneyP RutzT HugelshoferS GaxherriM Stress Perfusion CMR in Patients With Known and Suspected CAD: Prognostic Value and Optimal Ischemic Threshold for Revascularization JACC Cardiovasc Imaging [Internet] 2017 10 5 526 37 Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936878X17301894 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.02.006 Search in Google Scholar

6 Schwitter J, Wacker C, van Rossum A, Lombardi M, Al-Saadi N, Ahlstrom H, et al. MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multi-vendor, randomized trial. Eur Hear J. 2008;29. SchwitterJ WackerC van RossumA LombardiM Al-SaadiN AhlstromH MR-IMPACT: comparison of perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance with single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease in a multicentre, multi-vendor, randomized trial Eur Hear J 2008 29 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm617 Search in Google Scholar

7 Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, Al-Saadi N, Sauer E, Huettle K, et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative. Eur Heart J. 2013 Mar;34(10):775–81. SchwitterJ WackerCM WilkeN Al-SaadiN SauerE HuettleK MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative Eur Heart J 2013 Mar 34 10 775 81 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs022 Search in Google Scholar

8 Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, Brown JM, Nixon J, Everett CC, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet [Internet]. 2012 Feb;379(9814):453–60. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673611613354 GreenwoodJP MarediaN YoungerJF BrownJM NixonJ EverettCC Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial Lancet [Internet] 2012 Feb 379 9814 453 60 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0140673611613354 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 Search in Google Scholar

9 Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, Bettencourt N, Shah AM, Hussain ST, et al. Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2019 Jun 19;380(25):2418–28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716734 NagelE GreenwoodJP McCannGP BettencourtN ShahAM HussainST Magnetic Resonance Perfusion or Fractional Flow Reserve in Coronary Disease N Engl J Med [Internet] 2019 Jun 19 380 25 2418 28 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716734 10.1056/NEJMoa171673431216398 Search in Google Scholar

10 Onciul S, Plein S. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease – a practical approach. Rom J Cardiol. 2017;27(4):490–8. OnciulS PleinS Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease – a practical approach Rom J Cardiol 2017 27 4 490 8 Search in Google Scholar

11 Hendel RC, Friedrich MG, Schulz-Menger J, Zemmrich C, Bengel F, Berman DS, et al. CMR First-Pass Perfusion for Suspected Inducible Myocardial Ischemia. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Nov; 9(11):1338–48. HendelRC FriedrichMG Schulz-MengerJ ZemmrichC BengelF BermanDS CMR First-Pass Perfusion for Suspected Inducible Myocardial Ischemia JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016 Nov 9 11 1338 48 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.09.01027832901 Search in Google Scholar

12 Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2020;22(1):17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1 KramerCM BarkhausenJ Bucciarelli-DucciC FlammSD KimRJ NagelE Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols: 2020 update J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2020 22 1 17 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1 10.1186/s12968-020-00607-1703861132089132 Search in Google Scholar

13 Patriki D, von Felten E, Bakula A, Giannopoulos AA, Kamani CH, Schwyzer M, et al. Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2021;23(1):3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y PatrikiD von FeltenE BakulaA GiannopoulosAA KamaniCH SchwyzerM Splenic switch-off as a predictor for coronary adenosine response: validation against 13N-ammonia during co-injection myocardial perfusion imaging on a hybrid PET/CMR scanner J Cardiovasc Magn Reson [Internet]. 2021 23 1 3 Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y 10.1186/s12968-020-00696-y778958133407586 Search in Google Scholar

14 Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, Anderson JL, Arshad A, Biederman RWW, et al. Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017 Feb 17;376(8):755–64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603265 RussoRJ CostaHS SilvaPD AndersonJL ArshadA BiedermanRWW Assessing the Risks Associated with MRI in Patients with a Pacemaker or Defibrillator N Engl J Med [Internet] 2017 Feb 17 376 8 755 64 Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1603265 10.1056/NEJMoa160326528225684 Search in Google Scholar

15 Onciul S, Nicolaescu R, Predescu L, Capsa R, Vatasescu RG. Update on MRI safety in patients with stents, prosthetic heart valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Rom J Cardiol. 2019; 29(3):471–7. OnciulS NicolaescuR PredescuL CapsaR VatasescuRG Update on MRI safety in patients with stents, prosthetic heart valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices Rom J Cardiol 2019 29 3 471 7 Search in Google Scholar

16 Hong K, Collins JD, Knight BP, Carr JC, Lee DC, Kim D. Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device. Magn Reson Med [Internet]. 2018/09/09. 2019 Feb;81(2):1219–28. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30229560. HongK CollinsJD KnightBP CarrJC LeeDC KimD Wideband myocardial perfusion pulse sequence for imaging patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device Magn Reson Med [Internet] 2018/09/09. 2019 Feb 81 2 1219 28 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30229560. 10.1002/mrm.27458628984730229560 Search in Google Scholar