Outcome of topical steroid application in children with non-retractile prepuce

1Shahid SK. Phimosis in Children. ISRN Urology. 2012;2012:707329. doi:10.5402/2012/707329.Shahid SK Phimosis in Children ISRN Urology 20122012707329 doi10.5402/2012/707329Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2Ko MC, Lui CK, Lee WK, Jeng HS, Chiang HS, Li CY. Age-specific prevalence rates of phimosis and circumcision in Taiwanese boys. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(4):302-307.Ko MC Lui CK Lee WK Jeng HS Chiang HS Li CY Age-specific prevalence rates of phimosis and circumcision in Taiwanese boys J Formos Med Assoc 20071064302 30710.1016/S0929-6646(09)60256-4Search in Google Scholar

3Nascimento FJ, Pereira RF, Silva JL 2nd, Tavares A, Pompeo AC. Topical Betamethasone and Hyaluronidase in the Treatment of Phimosis in Boys: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo controlled Trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2011 May-Jun;37(3):314-319.Nascimento FJ Pereira RF Silva JL 2nd Tavares A Pompeo AC Topical Betamethasone and Hyaluronidase in the Treatment of Phimosis in Boys: a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo controlled Trial Int Braz J Urol 2011 May-Jun373314 31910.1590/S1677-5538201100030000421756378Search in Google Scholar

4Moreno G, Corbalán J, Peñaloza B, Pantoja T. Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD008973. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008973. pub2.Moreno G Corbalán J Peñaloza B Pantoja T Topical corticosteroids for treating phimosis in boys (Review) Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014 Issue 9. Art. No.: CD008973 DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008973 pub2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5Kikiros CS, Beasley SW, Woodward AA. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Pediatr Surg Int. 1993;8:329-332.Kikiros CS Beasley SW Woodward AA The response of phimosis to local steroid application Pediatr Surg Int 19938329 33210.1007/BF00173357Search in Google Scholar

6Lee C, Lee S.Effect of Topical Steroid (0.05% Clobetasol Propionate) Treatment in Children with Severe Phimosis. Korean journal of urology 2013;54:624-630.Lee C Lee S Effect of Topical Steroid (0.05% Clobetasol Propionate) Treatment in Children with Severe Phimosis Korean journal of urology 201354624 63010.4111/kju.2013.54.9.624377359424044098Search in Google Scholar

7Tekgül S, Riedmiller H, Dogan H et al. Guidelines on Paediatric Urology. Paediatric urology - update march 2013.Tekgül S Riedmiller H Dogan H et al Guidelines on Paediatric Urology Paediatric urology - update march 2013Search in Google Scholar

8McGregor T, Pike J, Leonard M.Pathologic and physiologic phimosis Approach to the phimotic foreskin. Can Fam Physician 2007;53:445-448.McGregor T Pike J Leonard M Pathologic and physiologic phimosis Approach to the phimotic foreskin Can Fam Physician 200753445 448Search in Google Scholar

9Howe R. Cost-effective Treatment of Phimosis. Paediatrics.1998;102; e43.Howe R Cost-effective Treatment of Phimosis Paediatrics 1998 102 e4310.1542/peds.102.4.e439755280Search in Google Scholar

10Marques T, Sampaio F, Favorito L. Treatment of phimosis with topical steroids and foreskin anatomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31:370-374.Marques T Sampaio F Favorito L Treatment of phimosis with topical steroids and foreskin anatomy Int Braz J Urol 200531370 37410.1590/S1677-5538200500040001216137407Search in Google Scholar

11Favorito L, Balassiano C, Rosado J, Cardoso L, Costa W, Sampaio F. Structural analysis of the phimotic prepuce in patients with failed topical treatment compared with untreated phimosis. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:802-808.Favorito L Balassiano C Rosado J Cardoso L Costa W Sampaio F Structural analysis of the phimotic prepuce in patients with failed topical treatment compared with untreated phimosis Int Braz J Urol 201238802 80810.1590/1677-55382013380680223302400Search in Google Scholar