A Method for Sensor Placement Taking into Account Diagnosability Criteria

Apt K. (2003). Principles of Constraint Programming, Cambridge University Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1017/CBO9780511615320Search in Google Scholar

Blanke M., Kinnaert M., Lunze J. and Staroswiecki M. (2006). Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

Bollobás B. (1998). Modern Graph Theory, Springer, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4612-0619-4Search in Google Scholar

Chittaro L. and Ranon R. (2004). Hierarchical model-based diagnosis based on structural abstraction, Artificial Intelligence 155(1-2): 147-182.10.1016/j.artint.2003.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Commault C., Dion J.-M. and Yacoub Agha S. (2006). Structural analysis for the sensor location problem in fault detection and isolation, Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS' 2006 Beijing, China, CD-ROM.10.1016/B978-008044485-7/50151-2Search in Google Scholar

Console L., Picardi C. and Ribando M. (2000). Diagnosis and diagnosability analysis using process algebra, Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis DX'2000, Morelia, Mexico.Search in Google Scholar

Cordier M.-O., Dague P., Lévy F., Dumas M., Montmain J., Staroswiecki M. and Travé-Massuyès L. (2000). A comparative analysis of AI and control theory approaches to model-based diagnosis, Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS 2000, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 329-334.Search in Google Scholar

Dalton T., Klotzek P. and Frank P. (1999). Application of sensitivity theory to fuzzy logic based FDI, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 9(3): 619-636.Search in Google Scholar

de Kleer J. and Williams B. C. (1992). Diagnosis with behavioral modes, in (W. Hamscher, L. Console and J. de Kleer, Eds.), Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, pp. 124-130.Search in Google Scholar

Dulmage A. L. and Mendelsohn N. S. (1959). A structure theory of bi-partite graphs of finite exterior extension, Transactions of the Royal Society of Canada 53(III): 1-13.Search in Google Scholar

Frisk E. and Krysander M. (2007). Sensor placement for maximum fault isolability, Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX-07), Nashville, TN, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Hamscher W., Console L. and De Kleer J. (1992). Readings in Model-Based Diagnosis, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.Search in Google Scholar

Korbicz J., Patan K. and Obuchowicz A. (1999). Dynamic neural networks for process modelling in fault detection and isolation, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 9(3): 519-546.Search in Google Scholar

Koscielny J., Syfert M. and Bartys M. (1999). Fuzzy logic faut diagnosis of industrial process actuators, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 9(3): 653-666.Search in Google Scholar

Krysander M., Aslund J. and Nyberg M. (2008). An efficient algorithm for finding minimal overconstrained subsystems for model-based diagnosis, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A 38(1): 197-206.10.1109/TSMCA.2007.909555Search in Google Scholar

Lopez-Toribio C., Patton R. and Uppal F. (1999). Artificial intelligence approaches to fault diagnosis for dynamic systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 9(3): 471-518.Search in Google Scholar

Madron F. and Veverka V. (1992). Optimal selection of measuring points in complex plants by linear models, AIChE Journal 38(2): 227-236.10.1002/aic.690380208Search in Google Scholar

Maquin D., Luong M. and Ragot J. (1997). Fault detection and isolation and sensor network design, European Journal of Automation 31(2): 393-406.Search in Google Scholar

Nyberg M. and Krysander M. (2003). Combining AI, FDI, and statistical hypothesis-testing in a framework for diagnosis, Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS'03, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 813-818.Search in Google Scholar

Ploix S., Désinde M. and Touaf S. (2005). Automatic design of detection tests in complex dynamic systems, Proceedings of the 16th IFAC World Congress, Prague, Czech Republic.10.3182/20050703-6-CZ-1902.01882Search in Google Scholar

Ploix S., Touaf S. and Flaus J. M. (2003). A logical framework for isolation in fault diagnosis, Proceedings of the IFAC Symposium SAFEPROCESS'2003, Washington, DC, USA.10.1016/S1474-6670(17)36592-8Search in Google Scholar

Pothen A. and Chin-Ju F. (1990). Computing the block triangular form of a sparse matrix, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 16(4): 303-324.10.1145/98267.98287Search in Google Scholar

Pulido B. and Alonso C. (2002). Possible conflicts, arrs, and conflicts, Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis (DX02), Semmering, Austria, pp. 122-128.Search in Google Scholar

Shumsky A. (2007). Redundancy relations for fault diagnosis in nonlinear uncertain systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 17(4): 477-489.10.2478/v10006-007-0040-1Search in Google Scholar

Struss P. (1992). What's in SD? Towards a theory of modeling for diagnosis, in (W. Hamscher, L. Console and J. de Kleer, Eds.), Readings in model-based diagnosis, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, pp. 419-449.Search in Google Scholar

Struss P., Rehfus B., Brignolo R., Cascio F., Console L., Dague P., Dubois P., Dressler O. and Millet D. (2002). Modelbased tools for the integration of design and diagnosis into a common process — A project report, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis DX'02, Semmering, Austria, pp. 25-32.Search in Google Scholar

Travé-Massuyès L., Escobet T. and Milne R. (2001). Model-based diagnosability and sensor placement application to a frame 6 gas turbine subsystem, Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis, Sansicario, Via Lattea, Italy, pp. 205-212.Search in Google Scholar

Witczak M. (2006). Advances in model-based fault diagnosis with evolutionary algorithms and neural networks, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 16(1): 85-99.Search in Google Scholar