1. bookTom 23 (2022): Zeszyt 2 (April 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
20 Mar 2000
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku
Otwarty dostęp

A Public Value-Based, Multilevel Evaluation Framework to Examine Public Bike-Sharing Systems. Implications for Cities’ Sustainable Transport Policies

Data publikacji: 30 Apr 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 23 (2022) - Zeszyt 2 (April 2022)
Zakres stron: 180 - 194
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
20 Mar 2000
Częstotliwość wydawania
4 razy w roku

1. Abolhassani, L., Afghari, A.P. and Borzadaran, H.M. (2019) Public preferences towards bicycle sharing system in developing countries: The case of Mashhad, Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 763–773. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018. Search in Google Scholar

2. Alsabi, E., Alrwais, L., Alosimai, R. et al. (2016) Benchmark for Smart Cities. In: Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 2016, pp. 166–177. IOS Press. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-611-8-166. Search in Google Scholar

3. Bamwesigye, D. and Hlavackova, P. (2019) Analysis of sustainable transport for smart cities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7). MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/SU11072140.10.3390/su11072140 Search in Google Scholar

4. Bevir, M., Rhodes, R.A.W. and Weller, P. (2003) Traditions of governance: Interpreting the changing role of the public sector. Public Administration, 81(1), 1–17. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9299.00334.10.1111/1467-9299.00334 Search in Google Scholar

5. Bissix, G. (2015) A multidimensional framework for assessing the acceptability of recreational all-terrain vehicle access on community trails and local public highways. Leisure/Loisir, 39(3–4), 345–359. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/14927713.2015.1116202.10.1080/14927713.2015.1116202 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bocken, N., Boons, F. and Baldassarre, B. (2019) Sustainable business model experimentation by understanding ecologies of business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 1498–1512. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018. Search in Google Scholar

7. Böcker, L., Dijst, M. and Faber, J. (2016) Weather, transport mode choices and emotional travel experiences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 360–373. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016. Search in Google Scholar

8. Boons, F. and Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: State-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 9–19. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012. Search in Google Scholar

9. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G.G., Loeffler, E. et al. (2015) Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S0047279414000567.10.1017/S0047279414000567 Search in Google Scholar

10. Brdulak, A., Chaberek, G. and Jagodziński, J. (2020) Determination of Electricity Demand by Personal Light Electric Vehicles (PLEVs): An Example of e-Motor Scooters in the Context of Large City Management in Poland. Energies 13(1), 194. DOI: 10.3390/en13010194.10.3390/en13010194 Search in Google Scholar

11. Caggiani, L., Camporeale, R., Marinelli, M. et al. (2019) User satisfaction based model for resource allocation in bike-sharing systems. Transport Policy, 80, 117–126. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2018. Search in Google Scholar

12. Caggiani, L., Colovic, A. and Ottomanelli, M. (2020) An equality-based model for bike-sharing stations location in bicycle-public transport multimodal mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 140, 251–265. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020. Search in Google Scholar

13. Chi, C.F., Chen, P.L., Saleh, W. et al. (2019) Helmet non-use by users of bikeshare programs, electric bicycles, racing bicycles, and personal bicycles: An observational study in Taipei, Taiwan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(2), 93–99. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2018.1441470.10.1080/15568318.2018.1441470 Search in Google Scholar

14. Dudziak, A., Stoma, M., Rydzak, L. et al. (2018) Wybór środka komunikacji w opinii mieskańców lubelszczyzny. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, 130, 127–138.10.29119/1641-3466.2018.130.12 Search in Google Scholar

15. Eren, E. and Uz, V.E. (2020) A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882 Search in Google Scholar

16. Fishman, E. and Schepers, P. (2016) Global bike share: What the data tells us about road safety. Journal of Safety Research, 56, 41–45. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015. Search in Google Scholar

17. Fishman, E., Washington, S. and Haworth, N. (2013) Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature. Transport Reviews, 33(2), 148–165. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.775612.10.1080/01441647.2013.775612 Search in Google Scholar

18. Font Vivanco, D., Kemp, R. and Van Der Voet, E. (2015) The relativity of eco-innovation: environmental rebound effects from past transport innovations in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 101, 71–85. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015. Search in Google Scholar

19. Garrard, J., Rose, G. and Lo, S.K. (2008) Promoting transportation cycling for women: The role of bicycle infrastructure. Preventive Medicine, 46(1), 55–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007. Search in Google Scholar

20. Geels, F.W., Schwanen, T., Sorrell, S. et al. (2018) Reducing energy demand through low carbon innovation: A sociotechnical transitions perspective and thirteen research debates. Energy Research and Social Science. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2017. Search in Google Scholar

21. Grönroos, C. (2008) Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates? European Business Review, 20(4), 298–314. Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI: 10.1108/09555340810886585.10.1108/09555340810886585 Search in Google Scholar

22. Guo, Y., Zhou, J., Wu, Y. et al. (2017) Identifying the factors affecting bike-sharing usage and degree of satisfaction in Ningbo, China. PLOS ONE, Liu J-G (ed.), 12(9), e0185100. Public Library of Science. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185100.10.1371/journal.pone.0185100560832028934321 Search in Google Scholar

23. Hazen, B., Overstreet, R. and Wang, Y. (2015) Predicting Public Bicycle Adoption Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 7(11), 14558–14573. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su71114558.10.3390/su71114558 Search in Google Scholar

24. Hsu, C.C., Liou, J.J.H., Lo, H.W. et al. (2018) Using a hybrid method for evaluating and improving the service quality of public bike-sharing systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 202, 1131–1144. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018. Search in Google Scholar

25. Jain, D. and Tiwari, G. (2016) How the present would have looked like? Impact of non-motorized transport and public transport infrastructure on travel behavior, energy consumption and CO2 emissions - Delhi, Pune and Patna. Sustainable Cities and Society, 22, 1–10. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2016. Search in Google Scholar

26. Kaspi, M., Raviv, T. and Tzur, M. (2017) Bike-sharing systems: User dissatisfaction in the presence of unusable bicycles. IISE Transactions, 49(2), 144–158. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2016.1224960.10.1080/0740817X.2016.1224960 Search in Google Scholar

27. Kim, J., Choi, K., Kim, S. et al. (2017) How to promote sustainable public bike system from a psychological perspective? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(4), 272–281. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2016.1252450.10.1080/15568318.2016.1252450 Search in Google Scholar

28. Kwiatkowski, M.A. (2018) Bike-sharing-boom – rozwój nowych form zrównoważonego transportu w Polsce na przykładzie roweru publicznego. Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG, 21(2), 60–69. Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego. DOI: 10.4467/2543859xpkg.18.017.10142.10.4467/2543859XPKG.18.017.10142 Search in Google Scholar

29. Lan, J., Ma, Y., Zhu, D. et al. (2017) Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike. Sustainability, 9(9), 1504. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su9091504.10.3390/su9091504 Search in Google Scholar

30. Lin, J.J., Wang, N.L. and Feng, C.M. (2017) Public bike system pricing and usage in Taipei. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(9), 633–641. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1301601.10.1080/15568318.2017.1301601 Search in Google Scholar

31. Liu, Y., Huang, D., Wang, M. et al. (2020) How do service quality, value, pleasure, and satisfaction create loyalty to smart dockless bike-sharing systems? Revista Brasileira de Gestao de Negocios, 22(3), 705–728. Fundacao Escola de Comercio Alvares Penteado. DOI: 10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4070.10.7819/rbgn.v22i3.4070 Search in Google Scholar

32. Loeffler, E. and Bovaird, T. (2019) Co-commissioning of public services and outcomes in the UK: Bringing co-production into the strategic commissioning cycle. Public Money and Management, 39(4), 241–252. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905.10.1080/09540962.2019.1592905 Search in Google Scholar

33. Lopez-Carreiro, I. and Monzon, A. (2018) Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 684–696. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018. Search in Google Scholar

34. Lu, M., Hsu, S.C., Chen, P.C. et al. (2018) Improving the sustainability of integrated transportation system with bike-sharing: A spatial agent-based approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 44–51. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018. Search in Google Scholar

35. Machiba, T. (2010) Eco-innovation for enabling resource efficiency and green growth: development of an analyticalframework and preliminary analysis of industryand policy practices. International Economics & Economic Policy, 7, 357–370.10.1007/s10368-010-0171-y Search in Google Scholar

36. Maioli, H.C., de Carvalho, R.C. and de Medeiros, D.D. (2019) SERVBIKE: Riding customer satisfaction of bicycle sharing service. Sustainable Cities and Society. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101680.10.1016/j.scs.2019.101680 Search in Google Scholar

37. Manzi, G. and Saibene, G. (2018) Are they telling the truth? Revealing hidden traits of satisfaction with a public bike-sharing service. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(4), 253–270. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1353186.10.1080/15568318.2017.1353186 Search in Google Scholar

38. Martin, E.W. and Shaheen, S.A. (2014) Evaluating public transit modal shift dynamics in response to bikesharing: A tale of two U.S. cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 41, 315–324. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014. Search in Google Scholar

39. Mátrai, T. and Tóth, J. (2016) Comparative Assessment of Public Bike Sharing Systems. In: Transportation Research Procedia, January 2016, 2344–2351. Elsevier B.V. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016. Search in Google Scholar

40. Médard de Chardon, C., Caruso, G. and Thomas, I. (2017) Bicycle sharing system ‘success’ determinants. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100, 202–214. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017. Search in Google Scholar

41. Miranda-Moreno, L. and Nosal, T. (2011) Weather or not to cycle: Temporal trends and impact of weather on cycling in an urban environment. Transportation Research Record. DOI: 10.3141/2247-06.10.3141/2247-06 Search in Google Scholar

42. Munkácsy, A. and Monzón, A. (2018) Diffusion of Bike Sharing as an Innovation Vector in the City: The Case of BiciMAD (Madrid). Journal of Urban Technology, 25(3), 1–26. Routledge. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1483679.10.1080/10630732.2018.1483679 Search in Google Scholar

43. Nosal, K. (2014) TransporT miejski i regionalny. Transport Miejski i Regionalny. Search in Google Scholar

44. Oostendorp, R. and Gebhardt, L. (2018) Combining means of transport as a users’ strategy to optimize traveling in an urban context: empirical results on intermodal travel behavior from a survey in Berlin. Journal of Transport Geography, 71, 72–83. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018. Search in Google Scholar

45. Osborne, S.P. and Brown, L. (2011) Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK. The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01932.x Search in Google Scholar

46. Otero, I., Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. and Rojas-Rueda, D. (2018) Health impacts of bike sharing systems in Europe. Environment International, 115, 387–394. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018. Search in Google Scholar

47. Pamuła, A. and Gontar, B. (2017) Rower miejski w Łodzi – ocena użytkowników. Nierówności społeczne a wzrost gospodarczy, 52(4), 490–499. University of Rzeszow. DOI: 10.15584/nsawg.2017. Search in Google Scholar

48. Pellicer-Chenoll, M., Pans, M., Seifert, R. et al. (2020) Gender differences in bicycle sharing system usage in the city of Valencia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 102556. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102556.10.1016/j.scs.2020.102556 Search in Google Scholar

49. Podgórniak-Krzykacz, A. and Trippner-Hrabi, J. (2021) Motives and factors that determine city residents’ use of public bicycles. The case of Lodz, Poland. Case Studies on Transport Policy. Elsevier BV. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2021. Search in Google Scholar

50. Pucher, J. and Buehler, R. (2008) Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), 495–528. DOI: 10.1080/01441640701806612.10.1080/01441640701806612 Search in Google Scholar

51. Puello, L.L.P. and Geurs, K. (2015) Modelling observed and unobserved factors in cycling to railway stations: Application to transit-oriented-developments in the Netherlands. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 15(1), 27–50. Editorial Board EJTIR. DOI: 10.18757/ejtir.2015.15.1.3057. Search in Google Scholar

52. Shaheen, S.A., Guzman, S. and Zhang, H. (2010) Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 159–167. SAGE PublicationsSage CA: Los Angeles, CA. DOI: 10.3141/2143-20.10.3141/2143-20 Search in Google Scholar

53. Shin, E.J. (2020) A comparative study of bike-sharing systems from a user’s perspective: An analysis of online reviews in three U.S. regions between 2010 and 2018. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1830320.10.1080/15568318.2020.1830320 Search in Google Scholar

54. Sojkin, B. and Michalak, S. (2019) Innowacyjność zachowań mieszkańców aglomeracji poznańskiej na rynku usług transportowycy. MINIB, 33(3), 71–98. Search in Google Scholar

55. Sopjani, L., Stier, J.J., Ritzén, S. et al. (2019) Involving users and user roles in the transition to sustainable mobility systems: The case of light electric vehicle sharing in Sweden. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 207–221. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2018. Search in Google Scholar

56. Sumaedi, S., Bakti, I.G.M.Y., Rakhmawati, T. et al. (2016) Factors influencing public transport passengers’ satisfaction: a new model. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(5), 585–597. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-05-2015-0084.10.1108/MEQ-05-2015-0084 Search in Google Scholar

57. Tłuczak, A. (2013) Determinanty wyboru środka komunikacji miejskiej na przykładzie Opola. Studia Miejskie, 10, 37–45. Uniwersytet Opolski.10.25167/sm.2362 Search in Google Scholar

58. Tokody, D. and Mezei, I.J. (2017) Creating smart, sustainable and safe cities. In: SISY 2017 - IEEE 15th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Proceedings, October 2017, 141–145. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. DOI: 10.1109/SISY.2017.8080541.10.1109/SISY.2017.8080541 Search in Google Scholar

59. van Waes, A., Farla, J., Frenken, K. et al. (2018) Business model innovation and socio-technical transitions. A new prospective framework with an application to bike sharing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1300–1312. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018. Search in Google Scholar

60. Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6.10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 Search in Google Scholar

61. Wang, M. and Zhou, X. (2017) Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 147–154. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017. Search in Google Scholar

62. Winslow, J. and Mont, O. (2019) Bicycle Sharing: Sustainable Value Creation and Institutionalisation Strategies in Barcelona. Sustainability, 11(3), 728. MDPI AG. DOI: 10.3390/su11030728.10.3390/su11030728 Search in Google Scholar

63. Xu, S.J. and Chow, J.Y.J. (2020) A longitudinal study of bike infrastructure impact on bikesharing system performance in New York City. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(11), 886–902. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1645921.10.1080/15568318.2019.1645921 Search in Google Scholar

64. Yan, S., Lu, C.C. and Wang, M.H. (2018) Stochastic fleet deployment models for public bicycle rental systems. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(1), 39–52. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2017.1324586.10.1080/15568318.2017.1324586 Search in Google Scholar

65. Zarząd Dróg i Transportu Urzędu Miasta Łodzi (2018) Plan zrównoważonego rozwoju publicznego transportu zbiorowego dla miasta Łodzi do roku 2025. Search in Google Scholar

66. Zhang, D., Xu, X. and Yang, X. (2015) User Satisfaction and Its Impacts on the Use of a Public Bicycle System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2512(1), 56–65. National Research Council. DOI: 10.3141/2512-07.10.3141/2512-07 Search in Google Scholar

67. Zhang, Y. and Mi, Z. (2018) Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy, 220, 296–301. Elsevier Ltd. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018. Search in Google Scholar

68. Zhou, J. (2012) Sustainable transportation in the US: A review of proposals, policies, and programs since 2000. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 1, 150–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.foar.2012. Search in Google Scholar

69. Zhou, Z. and Zhang, Z. (Justin) (2019) Customer satisfaction of bicycle sharing: studying perceived service quality with SEM model. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 22(5), 437–448. Taylor and Francis Ltd. DOI: 10.1080/13675567.2018.1513468.10.1080/13675567.2018.1513468 Search in Google Scholar

70. Zimon, D., Makara, M. and Gajewska, T. (2015) Stosunek mieszkańców wybranego miasta do zrównoważonych rozwiązań w transporcie. Logistyka-nauka 4. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD