[1. Bendaoud, F., Abdennebi, M. and Didi, F. (2018) Network Selection in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks: a Survey. In: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 4, p. 64.10.26636/jtit.2018.126218]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Yafang, W., Huimin, C. and Jinyan, Z. (2010) Notice of retraction network access selection algorithm based on the analytic hierarehy process and gray relation analysis. In: New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 4th International Conference, 2010, IEEE, pp. 503–506.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Bari, F. and Leung, V. (2007) Multi-attribute network selection by iterative topsis for heterogeneous wireless access. In: 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 808–812.10.1109/CCNC.2007.164]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bendaoud, F., Abdennebi, M., and Didi, F. (2015) Network selection using game theory. In: Control, Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT), 3rd International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–6.10.1109/CEIT.2015.7233014]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Lahby, M., Baghla, S. and Sekkaki, A. (2015) Survey and comparison of MADM methods for network selection access in heterogeneous networks. In: New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 7th International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–6.10.1109/NTMS.2015.7266522]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Fu, J., Wu, J., Zhang, J., Ping, L. and Li, Z. (2010) A novel AHP and GRA based handover decision mechanism in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: Information computing and applications, Springer, pp. 213–220.10.1007/978-3-642-16167-4_28]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Shaikh, F.S. (2010) Intelligent proactive handover and QoS management using TBVH in heterogeneous networks. PhD thesis, Citeseer.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. François, J.-M. and Leduc, G. (2006) Prédiction de mobilité par le mobile ou par le point d’accès: comparaison sur base de traces réelles. In: Colloque Francophone sur l’Ingénierie des Protocoles-CFIP 2006, Hermès, pp. 12–p.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Song, L., Kotz, D., Jain, R. and He, X. (2004) Evaluating location predictors with extensive Wi-Fi mobility data. In: INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third AnnualJoint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2, pp. 1414–1424.10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1357026]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Savitha, K. and Chandrasekar, C. (2011a) Trusted network selection using saw and topsis algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.0141.10.5120/3125-4300]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Nguyen-Vuong, Q.-T., Ghamri-Doudane, Y. and Agoulmine, N. (2008) On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks. In: Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2008. NOMS 2008. IEEE, pp. 144–151.10.1109/NOMS.2008.4575128]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Salih, Y. K., See, O. H., Ibrahim, R. W., Yussof, S. and Iqbal, A. (2015) A user-centric game selection model based on user preferences for the selection of the best heterogeneous wireless network. Annals of telecommunications-annales des télécommunications, 70(5–6), pp. 239–248.10.1007/s12243-014-0443-6]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Savitha, K. and Chandrasekar, C. (2011b) Vertical handover decision schemes using sawand WPM for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.4490.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. TalebiFard, P. and Leung, V. C. (2011) Context-aware mobility management in heterogeneous network environments, JoWUA, 2(2), pp. 19–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gambs, S., Killijian, M.-O. and del Prado Cortez, M. N. (2012) Next place prediction using mobility markov chains. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Measurement, Privacy, and Mobility, ACM, p. 3.10.1145/2181196.2181199]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Fettouh, A., El Kamoun, N. and El Fazziki, A. (2013) Improving vertical handover performance of real time applications over heterogeneous wireless networks, International Journal of Computer Applications, 62(21).10.1109/SETIT.2012.6481983]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Magagula, L.A., Chan, H.A. and Falowo, O.E. (2010) PMIPv6-HC: Handover mechanism for reducing handover delay and packet loss in NGWN. In: Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010 IEEE, pp. 1–5.10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5684108]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Roman, C., Liao, R., Ball, P. and Ou, S. (2016) Mobility and network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: User approach and implementation, Network Protocols and Algorithms, 8(2), pp. 107–122.10.5296/npa.v8i2.9327]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wang, L. and Binet, D. (2009) Madm-based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A simulation study. In: Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 2009. Wireless VITAE 2009. 1st International Conference, IEEE, pp. 559–564.10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172507]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Benmammar, B. and Krief, F. (2005) Gestion dynamique du handover horizontal et vertical basée sur le profil de mobilité de l’utilisateur. In: Colloque GRES 2005: Gestion de REseaux et de Services.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Keilson, J. (2012) Markov Chain Models — Rarity and Exponentiality, Springer Science & Business Media, 28.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Song, Q. and Jamalipour, A. (2005) An adaptive quality-of-service network selection mechanism for heterogeneous mobile networks, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 5(6), pp. 697–708.10.1002/wcm.330]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Gustafsson, E. and Jonsson, A. (2003) Always best connected, IEEE Wireless Communications, 10(1), pp. 49–55.10.1109/MWC.2003.1182111]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Choi, H.-H. and Cho, D.-H. (2005) Takeover: a new vertical handover concept for nextgeneration heterogeneous networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005. VTC 2005-Spring. 2005 IEEE 61st, 4, pp. 2225–2229.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Bendaoud, F., Didi, F. and Abdennebi, M. (2017) A modified-saw for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks, ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 15(2), pp. 8–17.10.37936/ecti-eec.2017152.171312]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Payaswini, P. and Manjaiah, D. (2014) Simulation and performance analysis of vertical handoff between WiFi and WIMAX using media independent handover services, International Journal of Computer Applications, 87(4).10.5120/15196-3578]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Nithyanandan, L. and Parthiban, I. (2012) Vertical handoff in WLAN-WIMAX-LTE heterogeneous networks through gateway relocation, International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 4(4), p. 203.10.5121/ijwmn.2012.4415]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Network simultor 3, https://www.nsnam.org/, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Grigorik, I. (2013) High Performance Browser Networking: What every web developer should know about networking and web performance. O’Reilly Media, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Hasib, M. (2006) Analysis of packet loss probing in packet networks. PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Nguyen-Duc, T. and Kamioka, E. (2016) An energy-efficient mobile-controlled vertical handover management for real time services, Journal of Computer and Communications, 4(17), p. 59.10.4236/jcc.2016.417004]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Shen, D.-M., Tian, H. and Sun, L. (2010) The QoE-oriented heterogeneous network selection based on fuzzy AHP methodology. In: Proc. of UBICOMM2010 (The Forth International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies), pp. 275–280.]Search in Google Scholar