Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Mobility Aware Network Selection in a Heterogeneous Wireless Environment


Zitieren

1. Bendaoud, F., Abdennebi, M. and Didi, F. (2018) Network Selection in Wireless Heterogeneous Networks: a Survey. In: Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology, 4, p. 64.10.26636/jtit.2018.126218Search in Google Scholar

2. Yafang, W., Huimin, C. and Jinyan, Z. (2010) Notice of retraction network access selection algorithm based on the analytic hierarehy process and gray relation analysis. In: New Trends in Information Science and Service Science (NISS), 4th International Conference, 2010, IEEE, pp. 503–506.Search in Google Scholar

3. Bari, F. and Leung, V. (2007) Multi-attribute network selection by iterative topsis for heterogeneous wireless access. In: 4th IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference, pp. 808–812.10.1109/CCNC.2007.164Search in Google Scholar

4. Bendaoud, F., Abdennebi, M., and Didi, F. (2015) Network selection using game theory. In: Control, Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT), 3rd International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–6.10.1109/CEIT.2015.7233014Search in Google Scholar

5. Lahby, M., Baghla, S. and Sekkaki, A. (2015) Survey and comparison of MADM methods for network selection access in heterogeneous networks. In: New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS), 7th International Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–6.10.1109/NTMS.2015.7266522Search in Google Scholar

6. Fu, J., Wu, J., Zhang, J., Ping, L. and Li, Z. (2010) A novel AHP and GRA based handover decision mechanism in heterogeneous wireless networks. In: Information computing and applications, Springer, pp. 213–220.10.1007/978-3-642-16167-4_28Search in Google Scholar

7. Shaikh, F.S. (2010) Intelligent proactive handover and QoS management using TBVH in heterogeneous networks. PhD thesis, Citeseer.Search in Google Scholar

8. François, J.-M. and Leduc, G. (2006) Prédiction de mobilité par le mobile ou par le point d’accès: comparaison sur base de traces réelles. In: Colloque Francophone sur l’Ingénierie des Protocoles-CFIP 2006, Hermès, pp. 12–p.Search in Google Scholar

9. Song, L., Kotz, D., Jain, R. and He, X. (2004) Evaluating location predictors with extensive Wi-Fi mobility data. In: INFOCOM 2004. Twenty-third AnnualJoint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, 2, pp. 1414–1424.10.1109/INFCOM.2004.1357026Search in Google Scholar

10. Savitha, K. and Chandrasekar, C. (2011a) Trusted network selection using saw and topsis algorithms for heterogeneous wireless networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.0141.10.5120/3125-4300Search in Google Scholar

11. Nguyen-Vuong, Q.-T., Ghamri-Doudane, Y. and Agoulmine, N. (2008) On utility models for access network selection in wireless heterogeneous networks. In: Network Operations and Management Symposium, 2008. NOMS 2008. IEEE, pp. 144–151.10.1109/NOMS.2008.4575128Search in Google Scholar

12. Salih, Y. K., See, O. H., Ibrahim, R. W., Yussof, S. and Iqbal, A. (2015) A user-centric game selection model based on user preferences for the selection of the best heterogeneous wireless network. Annals of telecommunications-annales des télécommunications, 70(5–6), pp. 239–248.10.1007/s12243-014-0443-6Search in Google Scholar

13. Savitha, K. and Chandrasekar, C. (2011b) Vertical handover decision schemes using sawand WPM for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.4490.Search in Google Scholar

14. TalebiFard, P. and Leung, V. C. (2011) Context-aware mobility management in heterogeneous network environments, JoWUA, 2(2), pp. 19–32.Search in Google Scholar

15. Gambs, S., Killijian, M.-O. and del Prado Cortez, M. N. (2012) Next place prediction using mobility markov chains. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Measurement, Privacy, and Mobility, ACM, p. 3.10.1145/2181196.2181199Search in Google Scholar

16. Fettouh, A., El Kamoun, N. and El Fazziki, A. (2013) Improving vertical handover performance of real time applications over heterogeneous wireless networks, International Journal of Computer Applications, 62(21).10.1109/SETIT.2012.6481983Search in Google Scholar

17. Magagula, L.A., Chan, H.A. and Falowo, O.E. (2010) PMIPv6-HC: Handover mechanism for reducing handover delay and packet loss in NGWN. In: Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010), 2010 IEEE, pp. 1–5.10.1109/GLOCOM.2010.5684108Search in Google Scholar

18. Roman, C., Liao, R., Ball, P. and Ou, S. (2016) Mobility and network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: User approach and implementation, Network Protocols and Algorithms, 8(2), pp. 107–122.10.5296/npa.v8i2.9327Search in Google Scholar

19. Wang, L. and Binet, D. (2009) Madm-based network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks: A simulation study. In: Wireless Communication, Vehicular Technology, Information Theory and Aerospace & Electronic Systems Technology, 2009. Wireless VITAE 2009. 1st International Conference, IEEE, pp. 559–564.10.1109/WIRELESSVITAE.2009.5172507Search in Google Scholar

20. Benmammar, B. and Krief, F. (2005) Gestion dynamique du handover horizontal et vertical basée sur le profil de mobilité de l’utilisateur. In: Colloque GRES 2005: Gestion de REseaux et de Services.Search in Google Scholar

21. Keilson, J. (2012) Markov Chain Models — Rarity and Exponentiality, Springer Science & Business Media, 28.Search in Google Scholar

22. Song, Q. and Jamalipour, A. (2005) An adaptive quality-of-service network selection mechanism for heterogeneous mobile networks, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 5(6), pp. 697–708.10.1002/wcm.330Search in Google Scholar

23. Gustafsson, E. and Jonsson, A. (2003) Always best connected, IEEE Wireless Communications, 10(1), pp. 49–55.10.1109/MWC.2003.1182111Search in Google Scholar

24. Choi, H.-H. and Cho, D.-H. (2005) Takeover: a new vertical handover concept for nextgeneration heterogeneous networks. In: Vehicular Technology Conference, 2005. VTC 2005-Spring. 2005 IEEE 61st, 4, pp. 2225–2229.Search in Google Scholar

25. Bendaoud, F., Didi, F. and Abdennebi, M. (2017) A modified-saw for network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks, ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics, and Communications, 15(2), pp. 8–17.10.37936/ecti-eec.2017152.171312Search in Google Scholar

26. Payaswini, P. and Manjaiah, D. (2014) Simulation and performance analysis of vertical handoff between WiFi and WIMAX using media independent handover services, International Journal of Computer Applications, 87(4).10.5120/15196-3578Search in Google Scholar

27. Nithyanandan, L. and Parthiban, I. (2012) Vertical handoff in WLAN-WIMAX-LTE heterogeneous networks through gateway relocation, International Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks, 4(4), p. 203.10.5121/ijwmn.2012.4415Search in Google Scholar

28. Network simultor 3, https://www.nsnam.org/, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

29. Grigorik, I. (2013) High Performance Browser Networking: What every web developer should know about networking and web performance. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

30. Hasib, M. (2006) Analysis of packet loss probing in packet networks. PhD thesis, Queen Mary, University of London.Search in Google Scholar

31. Nguyen-Duc, T. and Kamioka, E. (2016) An energy-efficient mobile-controlled vertical handover management for real time services, Journal of Computer and Communications, 4(17), p. 59.10.4236/jcc.2016.417004Search in Google Scholar

32. Shen, D.-M., Tian, H. and Sun, L. (2010) The QoE-oriented heterogeneous network selection based on fuzzy AHP methodology. In: Proc. of UBICOMM2010 (The Forth International Conference on Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies), pp. 275–280.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1407-6179
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Technik, Einführungen und Gesamtdarstellungen, andere