Morphological Characteristics of Maxillary Molars Interradicular Septum and Clinical Implications -What Do We Know So Far?

1. Stanley JN. Wheeler’s dental anatomy. In: Physiology and Occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2010. Search in Google Scholar

2. Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10(1):81-6.10.4103/1658-354X.169482476004926955316 Search in Google Scholar

3. Clark TM, Yagiela JA. Advanced techniques and armamentarium for dental local anesthesia. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(4):757-68.10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.01720831937 Search in Google Scholar

4. Rodriguez-Tizcareño MH, Bravo-Flores C. Anatomically guided implant site preparation technique at molar sites. Implant Dent 2009; (5):393-401.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4b20522129957 Search in Google Scholar

5. Daftary F. Dentoalveolar morphology: evaluation of natural root form versus cylindrical implant fixtures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9(4): 469-77. Search in Google Scholar

6. Paolantonio M, di Placido G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Molar root furcation: morphometric and morphologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18(5): 488-501. Search in Google Scholar

7. Misch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today 1989;8(4):39-44. Search in Google Scholar

8. Radlansky RJ, Renz H, Matalova E, Han SM, Leckzik V, Wehofsky R, Mey R. P51-52 prenatal formation of the maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone in mice. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2011;49(3):116-9. Search in Google Scholar

9. Fleischmannova J, Matalova E, Sharpe PT, Misek I, Radlanski RJ. Formation of the tooth-bone interface. J Dent Res 2010; 89(2): 108-15.10.1177/002203450935544020042740 Search in Google Scholar

10. Parmar G, Vashi P. Hemisection. A case report and review. J Endod 2003;15:26-9. Search in Google Scholar

11. Babaji P, Sihag T, Chaurasia VR, Senthilnathan S. Hemisection: A conservative management of periodontally involved molar tooth in a young patient. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2015;6(1):253-5.10.4103/0976-9668.149212436705325810677 Search in Google Scholar

12. Mokbel N, Kassir AR, Naaman N, Megarbane JM. Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part I: A Systematic Review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. J 2019;39(1):e11-e31.10.11607/prd.379830543727 Search in Google Scholar

13. Sahoo S, Sethi K, Kumar P, Bansal A, Menagment of periodontal furcation defects employing molar bisection; A case report with review of the literature. Dental Hypothesis2013; 4(3):97-101.10.4103/2155-8213.116341 Search in Google Scholar

14. Grover V, Malhotra R, Kapoor A, Mankotia CS, Bither R. Correlation of the interdental and the interradicular bone loss: A radiovisuographic analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18(4):482-710.4103/0972-124X.138701415859125210264 Search in Google Scholar

15. Bui DX. Treatment of furcation defects. Available from: http://www.drbui.com/index.html. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 10]. Search in Google Scholar

16. Carranza FA, Takei HH. Radiographic Aids inthe diagnosis of periodontal disease: In: Newman, Takei Carranza, 10th ed, Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 2006. Search in Google Scholar

17. Mathews DC, Smith CJ, Hanscom SL. Tooth loss in periodontal patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001;67:207-10. Search in Google Scholar

18. Popova C, Mlachkova A, Emilov D. Correlation of interdental and interradicular bone loss-radiographic assessment. J IMAB- Ann Proc (Scientic Papers) 2008; book 2. p. 35-7. Search in Google Scholar

19. Fugazzotto PA. Implant Placement at the Time of Mandibular Molar Extraction: Description of Technique and Preliminary Results of 341 Cases. J. Periodontol 2008;79:737–747.10.1902/jop.2008.07029318380569 Search in Google Scholar

20. Agostinelli C, Agostinelli A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Anatomical and Radiologic Evaluation of the Dimensions of Upper Molar Alveoli. Implant Dent 2018;27(2):171-176.10.1097/ID.000000000000074729557796 Search in Google Scholar

21. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9(5):332-43. Search in Google Scholar

22. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997;68(10):915-23.10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.9159358358 Search in Google Scholar

23. Atieh MA, Payne AG, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan MP. Immediate placement or immediate restoration/ loading of single implants for molar tooth replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):401-15. Search in Google Scholar

24. Fugazzatto P, Implant placement at the time of maxillary molar extraction: Treatment protocols and report of results. J Peridontol2008;79:216-223.10.1902/jop.2008.07033818251636 Search in Google Scholar

25. Cafiero C, Annibali S, Gherlone E,et al, ITI study Group Italia. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction site: A 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:170-174.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x18416726 Search in Google Scholar

26. Smith RB, Tarnow DP.Classification of molar extractionsites for immediate dental implant placement: technical note. Int. J.Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2013; 28:911–916. Search in Google Scholar

27. Block MS. Placement of implants into fresh molar sites: results of 35 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(1):170-4.10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.04021050643 Search in Google Scholar

28. Hämmerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 :26–28. Search in Google Scholar

29. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:333–343. Search in Google Scholar

30. Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: Bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:206–217. Search in Google Scholar

31. Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1995; 10:561–567. Search in Google Scholar

32. Rosenquist B, Björn G. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205–209.10.1097/00008505-199600540-00032 Search in Google Scholar

33. Khouly I, Keenan AV. Review suggests higher failure rates for dental implants placed in fresh extraction sites. Evid. Based Dent2015;16:54–55.10.1038/sj.ebd.640109826114791 Search in Google Scholar

34. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent 2015;43:16–41.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.00725433139 Search in Google Scholar

35. Grunder U. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:11–17. Search in Google Scholar

36. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(l):26–28. Search in Google Scholar

37. Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S, Ceci C, Testori T. Immediate loading of postextraction implants in the esthetic area: systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(1): 52-70.10.1111/cid.1207423607327 Search in Google Scholar

38. Chen H, Wang W, Gu X. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):478.10.1186/s12903-021-01849-w847489734579702 Search in Google Scholar

39. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J PeriodonticsRestorative Dent 2005;25:113–119. Search in Google Scholar

40. Rodriguez-Tizcareño MH, Bravo-Flores C. Anatomically guided implant site preparation technique at molar sites. Implant Dent 2009;18:393–401.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4b20522129957 Search in Google Scholar

41. Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 2010;38:612–620.10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.01320546821 Search in Google Scholar

42. Hamouda NI, Mourad SI, El-Kenawy MH, Maria OM. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the mandibular molar sites: a preliminary study of a modified insertion technique. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(1): e107-16.10.1111/cid.1213523927366 Search in Google Scholar

43. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:189–199. Search in Google Scholar

44. Liechtung MA. New approach to implant provisionalization. Dent Today 2012;31:70–74. Search in Google Scholar

45. Romanos GE. Treatment of advanced periodontal destruction with immediately loaded implants and simultaneous bone augmentation: A case report. J Periodontol 2003;74:255–261.10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.25512666715 Search in Google Scholar

46. Sayed AJ, Shaikh SS, Shaikh SY, Hussain MA. Inter radicular bone dimensions in primary stability of immediate molar implants - A cone beam computed tomography retrospective analysis. Saudi Dent J 2021;33(8):1091-1097.10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.04.002866517734938054 Search in Google Scholar

47. Calvo-Guirado JL, López-López PJ, Mate Sanchez JE, Gargallo Albiol J,Velasco Ortega E, Delgado RR. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1286–94.10.1111/clr.1226724118345 Search in Google Scholar

48. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;2:51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121.10.17096/jiufd.00289575083329354314 Search in Google Scholar

49. Vasiljevic M, Milanovic P, Jovicic N, Vasovic M, Milovanovic D, Vojinovic R, Selakovic D, Rosic G. Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics of Anterior Maxilla Accessory Canals and Relationship with Nasopalatine Canal Type-A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(8):1510.10.3390/diagnostics11081510839447234441443 Search in Google Scholar

50. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 2018;18(1):88.10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5595236529764458 Search in Google Scholar

51. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S12110.17096/jiufd.00289 Search in Google Scholar

52. Danforth RA, Miles DA. Cone beam volume imaging (cbvi): 3d applications for dentistry. Irish Dent 2007;10(9):14-18. Search in Google Scholar

53. Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: What is new and on the horizon? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139 Suppl:20S-24S.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.035418539868 Search in Google Scholar

54. Jacobs R. Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. JBRBTR2011;94:254–65.10.5334/jbr-btr.66222191290 Search in Google Scholar

55. Jacobs R Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Periodontology 2000 2014;66:203–13.10.1111/prd.1205125123769 Search in Google Scholar

56. Milanovic P, Selakovic D, Vasiljevic M, Jovicic NU, Milovanović D, Vasovic M, Rosic G. Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Relationship with the Anterior Maxillary Bone-A ConeBeam Computed Tomography Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(5):915.10.3390/diagnostics11050915816121534065608 Search in Google Scholar

57. Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M. Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone - CBCT Study. Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 2021;0(0).10.2478/sjecr-2021-0029 Search in Google Scholar

58. Arnaut A, Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M, Jovicic N, Vojinovic R, Selakovic D, Rosic G. The Shape of Nasopalatine Canal as a Determining Factor in Therapeutic Approach for Orthodontic Teeth Movement-A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(12):2345.10.3390/diagnostics11122345870067234943581 Search in Google Scholar

59. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC, American Academy of O, Maxillofacial R. Position statement of the American academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113(6):817-826.10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.00522668710 Search in Google Scholar

60. Yajima A, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Sano T, Hayakawa Y, Otonari T, Tanabe K, Wakoh M, Mizuta S, Yonezu H, Nakagawa K, Yajima Y. Cone-beam ct (cb throne) applied to dentomaxillofacial region. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2006;47(3):133-141.10.2209/tdcpublication.47.13317344621 Search in Google Scholar

61. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P. E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:566–70.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130518.x12674118 Search in Google Scholar

62. Agostinelli C, Agostinelli A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Radiological Evaluation of the Dimensions of Lower Molar Alveoli. Implant Dent 2018;27(3):271-275.10.1097/ID.000000000000075729652756 Search in Google Scholar

63. Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O’Neal RB. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):351-60. Search in Google Scholar

64. Wilson TG Jr, Schenk R, Buser D, Cochran D. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(3):333-41. Search in Google Scholar

65. Hattingh A, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe SA. Retrospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2019; 21: 879–887. Search in Google Scholar

66. Hattingh A, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Huyghe M, Vandeweghe SA. Prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2018;20:1009–1015. Search in Google Scholar

67. Hattingh A, De Bruyn H, Ackermann A, Vandeweghe S. Immediate Placement of Ultrawide-Diameter Implants in Molar Sockets: Description of a Recommended Technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent 2018; 38:7–23. Search in Google Scholar

68. Ketabi M, Deporter D, Atenafu EG. A Systematic Review of Outcomes Following Immediate Molar Implant Placement Based on Recently Published Studies. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2016; 18:1084–1094. Search in Google Scholar

69. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Sacco R. Modified insertion technique for immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the first maxillary molar sites: a 3- year prospective study. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):220-8.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181dbe2fe20523178 Search in Google Scholar

70. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Hürzeler MB. Pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation: case presentations of a novel approach to immediate implant placement at multirooted molar sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(1):89-96.10.11607/prd.144423342351 Search in Google Scholar

71. Guarnieri R, Di Nardo D, Di Giorgio G, Miccoli G, Testarelli L. Immediate non-submerged implants with laser-microtextured collar placed in the inter-radicular septum of mandibular molar extraction sockets associated to GBR: Results at 3-year. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(4):e363-e370.10.4317/jced.56277719569132382386 Search in Google Scholar

72. El Haddad E, Lauritano D, Carinci F. Interradicular septum as guide for pilot drill in postextractive implantology: a technical note. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(1):81-4.10.5005/jp-journals-10024-164025876956 Search in Google Scholar

73. Bleyan S, Gaspar J, Huwais S, Schwimer C, Mazor Z, Mendes JJ, Neiva R. Molar Septum Expansion with Osseodensification for Immediate Implant Placement, Retrospective Multicenter Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow- Up, Introducing a New Molar Socket Classification. J Funct Biomater 2021;12(4):66.10.3390/jfb12040066870849334940545 Search in Google Scholar

74. Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2012; 23:767–774. Search in Google Scholar

75. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent 2017; 38:88–95. Search in Google Scholar

76. Javed F, Ahmed H, Crespi R, Romanos G. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv. Med. Appl. Sci2013; 5:162–167.10.1556/imas.5.2013.4.3387359424381734 Search in Google Scholar

77. Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2017;32:27–36. Search in Google Scholar

78. Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bonedensity in low-density bone: In vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant. Dent 2016; 25:24–31. Search in Google Scholar

79. Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, et al. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. Anexperimental study in sheep. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 2016; 63:56–65. Search in Google Scholar

80. Alifarag AM, Lopez CD, Neiva RF, Tovar N, Witek L, Coelho PG. Atemporal osseointegration: Early biomechanicalstability through osseodensification. J. Orthop. Res 2018;36:2516–2523. Search in Google Scholar

81. Lopez CD, Alifarag AM, Torroni A, Tovar N, Diaz-Siso JR, Witek L, et al. Osseodensification forenhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 2017, 69:275–281.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020543497528113132 Search in Google Scholar

82. Koutouzis T, Huwais S, Hasan F, Trahan W, Waldrop T, Neiva R. Alveolar Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification- Mediated Plastic Deformation and Compaction Autografting: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Implant. Dent 2019;28:349–355. Search in Google Scholar

83. Machado R, da Gama C, Batista S, Rizzo D, Valiense H, Moreira R. Tomographic and clinical findings, pre-, trans-, and post-operative, of osseodensification in immediate loading. Int. J. Growth Factors Stem Cells Dent2018;1:101–105.10.4103/GFSC.GFSC_22_18 Search in Google Scholar

84. Neiva R, Tanello B, Duarte W, Coelho PG, Witek L, Silva F. Effects of osseodensification on Astra TX and EV implant systems. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2018; 29:444. Search in Google Scholar

85. Tanello B, Neiva R, Huwais S. Osseodensification Protocols for Enhancement of Primary and Secondary Implant Stability- A Retrospective 5-year follow-up Multicenter Study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2019; 30:414. Search in Google Scholar

86. Gaspar J, Esteves T, Gaspar R, Rua J, João Mendes J. Osseodensification for implant site preparation in the maxilla- aprospective study of 97 implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res 2018; 29:163.10.1111/clr.48_13358 Search in Google Scholar

87. Kumar B, Narayan V. Minimally invasive crestal approach sinus floor elevation using Densah burs, and Hydraulic lift utilizing putty graft in cartridge delivery. Clin. Oral Implants Res 2017; 28:203. Search in Google Scholar

88. Huwais S, Mazor Z, Ioannou AL, Gluckman H, Neiva R. A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study with Upto- 5-Year Follow-up Utilizing a Method that Enhances Bone Density and Allows for Transcrestal Sinus Augmentation Through Compaction Grafting. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2018;33:1305–1311. Search in Google Scholar