[
1. Stanley JN. Wheeler’s dental anatomy. In: Physiology and Occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier; 2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Gazal G, Fareed WM, Zafar MS. Role of intraseptal anesthesia for pain-free dental treatment. Saudi J Anaesth 2016;10(1):81-6.10.4103/1658-354X.169482476004926955316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Clark TM, Yagiela JA. Advanced techniques and armamentarium for dental local anesthesia. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54(4):757-68.10.1016/j.cden.2010.06.01720831937
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Rodriguez-Tizcareño MH, Bravo-Flores C. Anatomically guided implant site preparation technique at molar sites. Implant Dent 2009; (5):393-401.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4b20522129957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Daftary F. Dentoalveolar morphology: evaluation of natural root form versus cylindrical implant fixtures. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9(4): 469-77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Paolantonio M, di Placido G, Scarano A, Piattelli A. Molar root furcation: morphometric and morphologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18(5): 488-501.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Misch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today 1989;8(4):39-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Radlansky RJ, Renz H, Matalova E, Han SM, Leckzik V, Wehofsky R, Mey R. P51-52 prenatal formation of the maxillary and mandibular alveolar bone in mice. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2011;49(3):116-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Fleischmannova J, Matalova E, Sharpe PT, Misek I, Radlanski RJ. Formation of the tooth-bone interface. J Dent Res 2010; 89(2): 108-15.10.1177/002203450935544020042740
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Parmar G, Vashi P. Hemisection. A case report and review. J Endod 2003;15:26-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Babaji P, Sihag T, Chaurasia VR, Senthilnathan S. Hemisection: A conservative management of periodontally involved molar tooth in a young patient. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2015;6(1):253-5.10.4103/0976-9668.149212436705325810677
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Mokbel N, Kassir AR, Naaman N, Megarbane JM. Root Resection and Hemisection Revisited. Part I: A Systematic Review. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. J 2019;39(1):e11-e31.10.11607/prd.379830543727
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Sahoo S, Sethi K, Kumar P, Bansal A, Menagment of periodontal furcation defects employing molar bisection; A case report with review of the literature. Dental Hypothesis2013; 4(3):97-101.10.4103/2155-8213.116341
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Grover V, Malhotra R, Kapoor A, Mankotia CS, Bither R. Correlation of the interdental and the interradicular bone loss: A radiovisuographic analysis. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2014;18(4):482-710.4103/0972-124X.138701415859125210264
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Bui DX. Treatment of furcation defects. Available from: http://www.drbui.com/index.html. [Last accessed on 2013 Jan 10].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Carranza FA, Takei HH. Radiographic Aids inthe diagnosis of periodontal disease: In: Newman, Takei Carranza, 10th ed, Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Philadelphia: W.B.Saunders Company; 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Mathews DC, Smith CJ, Hanscom SL. Tooth loss in periodontal patients. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001;67:207-10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Popova C, Mlachkova A, Emilov D. Correlation of interdental and interradicular bone loss-radiographic assessment. J IMAB- Ann Proc (Scientic Papers) 2008; book 2. p. 35-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Fugazzotto PA. Implant Placement at the Time of Mandibular Molar Extraction: Description of Technique and Preliminary Results of 341 Cases. J. Periodontol 2008;79:737–747.10.1902/jop.2008.07029318380569
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Agostinelli C, Agostinelli A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Anatomical and Radiologic Evaluation of the Dimensions of Upper Molar Alveoli. Implant Dent 2018;27(2):171-176.10.1097/ID.000000000000074729557796
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9(5):332-43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol 1997;68(10):915-23.10.1902/jop.1997.68.10.9159358358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Atieh MA, Payne AG, Duncan WJ, de Silva RK, Cullinan MP. Immediate placement or immediate restoration/ loading of single implants for molar tooth replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25(2):401-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Fugazzatto P, Implant placement at the time of maxillary molar extraction: Treatment protocols and report of results. J Peridontol2008;79:216-223.10.1902/jop.2008.07033818251636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Cafiero C, Annibali S, Gherlone E,et al, ITI study Group Italia. Immediate transmucosal implant placement in molar extraction site: A 12-month prospective multicenter cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:170-174.10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01541.x18416726
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Smith RB, Tarnow DP.Classification of molar extractionsites for immediate dental implant placement: technical note. Int. J.Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2013; 28:911–916.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Block MS. Placement of implants into fresh molar sites: results of 35 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69(1):170-4.10.1016/j.joms.2010.07.04021050643
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Hämmerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 :26–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989;9:333–343.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: Bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:206–217.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Watzek G, Haider R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Haas R. Immediate and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants1995; 10:561–567.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Rosenquist B, Björn G. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205–209.10.1097/00008505-199600540-00032
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Khouly I, Keenan AV. Review suggests higher failure rates for dental implants placed in fresh extraction sites. Evid. Based Dent2015;16:54–55.10.1038/sj.ebd.640109826114791
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets versus healed sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent 2015;43:16–41.10.1016/j.jdent.2014.11.00725433139
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Grunder U. Stability of the mucosal topography around single-tooth implants and adjacent teeth: 1-year results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:11–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(l):26–28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Del Fabbro M, Ceresoli V, Taschieri S, Ceci C, Testori T. Immediate loading of postextraction implants in the esthetic area: systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(1): 52-70.10.1111/cid.1207423607327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Chen H, Wang W, Gu X. Three-dimensional alveolar bone assessment of mandibular molars for immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study. BMC Oral Health 2021;21(1):478.10.1186/s12903-021-01849-w847489734579702
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Grunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3-D bone-to-implant relationship on esthetics. Int J PeriodonticsRestorative Dent 2005;25:113–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Rodriguez-Tizcareño MH, Bravo-Flores C. Anatomically guided implant site preparation technique at molar sites. Implant Dent 2009;18:393–401.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4b20522129957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Javed F, Romanos GE. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. J Dent 2010;38:612–620.10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.01320546821
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Hamouda NI, Mourad SI, El-Kenawy MH, Maria OM. Immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the mandibular molar sites: a preliminary study of a modified insertion technique. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17(1): e107-16.10.1111/cid.1213523927366
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: A prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18:189–199.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Liechtung MA. New approach to implant provisionalization. Dent Today 2012;31:70–74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Romanos GE. Treatment of advanced periodontal destruction with immediately loaded implants and simultaneous bone augmentation: A case report. J Periodontol 2003;74:255–261.10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.25512666715
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Sayed AJ, Shaikh SS, Shaikh SY, Hussain MA. Inter radicular bone dimensions in primary stability of immediate molar implants - A cone beam computed tomography retrospective analysis. Saudi Dent J 2021;33(8):1091-1097.10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.04.002866517734938054
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Calvo-Guirado JL, López-López PJ, Mate Sanchez JE, Gargallo Albiol J,Velasco Ortega E, Delgado RR. Crestal bone loss related to immediate implants in crestal and subcrestal position: a pilot study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1286–94.10.1111/clr.1226724118345
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;2:51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121.10.17096/jiufd.00289575083329354314
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Vasiljevic M, Milanovic P, Jovicic N, Vasovic M, Milovanovic D, Vojinovic R, Selakovic D, Rosic G. Morphological and Morphometric Characteristics of Anterior Maxilla Accessory Canals and Relationship with Nasopalatine Canal Type-A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(8):1510.10.3390/diagnostics11081510839447234441443
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 2018;18(1):88.10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5595236529764458
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent 2017;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S12110.17096/jiufd.00289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Danforth RA, Miles DA. Cone beam volume imaging (cbvi): 3d applications for dentistry. Irish Dent 2007;10(9):14-18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: What is new and on the horizon? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139 Suppl:20S-24S.10.14219/jada.archive.2008.035418539868
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Jacobs R. Dental cone beam CT and its justified use in oral health care. JBRBTR2011;94:254–65.10.5334/jbr-btr.66222191290
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Jacobs R Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Periodontology 2000 2014;66:203–13.10.1111/prd.1205125123769
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Milanovic P, Selakovic D, Vasiljevic M, Jovicic NU, Milovanović D, Vasovic M, Rosic G. Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Relationship with the Anterior Maxillary Bone-A ConeBeam Computed Tomography Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(5):915.10.3390/diagnostics11050915816121534065608
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M. Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone - CBCT Study. Serbian Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research 2021;0(0).10.2478/sjecr-2021-0029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Arnaut A, Milanovic P, Vasiljevic M, Jovicic N, Vojinovic R, Selakovic D, Rosic G. The Shape of Nasopalatine Canal as a Determining Factor in Therapeutic Approach for Orthodontic Teeth Movement-A CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11(12):2345.10.3390/diagnostics11122345870067234943581
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC, American Academy of O, Maxillofacial R. Position statement of the American academy of oral and maxillofacial radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;113(6):817-826.10.1016/j.oooo.2012.03.00522668710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Yajima A, Otonari-Yamamoto M, Sano T, Hayakawa Y, Otonari T, Tanabe K, Wakoh M, Mizuta S, Yonezu H, Nakagawa K, Yajima Y. Cone-beam ct (cb throne) applied to dentomaxillofacial region. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2006;47(3):133-141.10.2209/tdcpublication.47.13317344621
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P. E.A.O. Guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:566–70.10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130518.x12674118
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Agostinelli C, Agostinelli A, Berardini M, Trisi P. Radiological Evaluation of the Dimensions of Lower Molar Alveoli. Implant Dent 2018;27(3):271-275.10.1097/ID.000000000000075729652756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Akimoto K, Becker W, Persson R, Baker DA, Rohrer MD, O’Neal RB. Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(3):351-60.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Wilson TG Jr, Schenk R, Buser D, Cochran D. Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: a report of histologic and histometric analyses of human biopsies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13(3):333-41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Hattingh A, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe SA. Retrospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2019; 21: 879–887.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Hattingh A, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Huyghe M, Vandeweghe SA. Prospective study on ultra-wide diameter dental implants for immediate molar replacement. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2018;20:1009–1015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Hattingh A, De Bruyn H, Ackermann A, Vandeweghe S. Immediate Placement of Ultrawide-Diameter Implants in Molar Sockets: Description of a Recommended Technique. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent 2018; 38:7–23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Ketabi M, Deporter D, Atenafu EG. A Systematic Review of Outcomes Following Immediate Molar Implant Placement Based on Recently Published Studies. Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat. Res 2016; 18:1084–1094.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Sacco R. Modified insertion technique for immediate implant placement into fresh extraction socket in the first maxillary molar sites: a 3- year prospective study. Implant Dent 2010;19(3):220-8.10.1097/ID.0b013e3181dbe2fe20523178
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Hürzeler MB. Pre-extractive interradicular implant bed preparation: case presentations of a novel approach to immediate implant placement at multirooted molar sites. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(1):89-96.10.11607/prd.144423342351
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Guarnieri R, Di Nardo D, Di Giorgio G, Miccoli G, Testarelli L. Immediate non-submerged implants with laser-microtextured collar placed in the inter-radicular septum of mandibular molar extraction sockets associated to GBR: Results at 3-year. J Clin Exp Dent 2020;12(4):e363-e370.10.4317/jced.56277719569132382386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. El Haddad E, Lauritano D, Carinci F. Interradicular septum as guide for pilot drill in postextractive implantology: a technical note. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(1):81-4.10.5005/jp-journals-10024-164025876956
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Bleyan S, Gaspar J, Huwais S, Schwimer C, Mazor Z, Mendes JJ, Neiva R. Molar Septum Expansion with Osseodensification for Immediate Implant Placement, Retrospective Multicenter Study with Up-to-5-Year Follow- Up, Introducing a New Molar Socket Classification. J Funct Biomater 2021;12(4):66.10.3390/jfb12040066870849334940545
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. Marquezan M, Osório A, Sant’Anna E, Souza MM, Maia L. Does bone mineral density influence the primary stability of dental implants? A systematic review. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2012; 23:767–774.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J. Implant Insertion Torque: Its Role in Achieving Primary Stability of Restorable Dental Implants. Compend. Contin. Educ. Dent 2017; 38:88–95.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Javed F, Ahmed H, Crespi R, Romanos G. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv. Med. Appl. Sci2013; 5:162–167.10.1556/imas.5.2013.4.3387359424381734
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2017;32:27–36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New osseodensification implant site preparation method to increase bonedensity in low-density bone: In vivo evaluation in sheep. Implant. Dent 2016; 25:24–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. Lahens B, Neiva R, Tovar N, Alifarag AM, Jimbo R, Bonfante EA, et al. Biomechanical and histologic basis of osseodensification drilling for endosteal implant placement in low density bone. Anexperimental study in sheep. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 2016; 63:56–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
80. Alifarag AM, Lopez CD, Neiva RF, Tovar N, Witek L, Coelho PG. Atemporal osseointegration: Early biomechanicalstability through osseodensification. J. Orthop. Res 2018;36:2516–2523.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
81. Lopez CD, Alifarag AM, Torroni A, Tovar N, Diaz-Siso JR, Witek L, et al. Osseodensification forenhancement of spinal surgical hardware fixation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater 2017, 69:275–281.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.01.020543497528113132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
82. Koutouzis T, Huwais S, Hasan F, Trahan W, Waldrop T, Neiva R. Alveolar Ridge Expansion by Osseodensification- Mediated Plastic Deformation and Compaction Autografting: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Implant. Dent 2019;28:349–355.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
83. Machado R, da Gama C, Batista S, Rizzo D, Valiense H, Moreira R. Tomographic and clinical findings, pre-, trans-, and post-operative, of osseodensification in immediate loading. Int. J. Growth Factors Stem Cells Dent2018;1:101–105.10.4103/GFSC.GFSC_22_18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
84. Neiva R, Tanello B, Duarte W, Coelho PG, Witek L, Silva F. Effects of osseodensification on Astra TX and EV implant systems. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2018; 29:444.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
85. Tanello B, Neiva R, Huwais S. Osseodensification Protocols for Enhancement of Primary and Secondary Implant Stability- A Retrospective 5-year follow-up Multicenter Study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res 2019; 30:414.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
86. Gaspar J, Esteves T, Gaspar R, Rua J, João Mendes J. Osseodensification for implant site preparation in the maxilla- aprospective study of 97 implants. Clin. Oral Implants Res 2018; 29:163.10.1111/clr.48_13358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
87. Kumar B, Narayan V. Minimally invasive crestal approach sinus floor elevation using Densah burs, and Hydraulic lift utilizing putty graft in cartridge delivery. Clin. Oral Implants Res 2017; 28:203.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
88. Huwais S, Mazor Z, Ioannou AL, Gluckman H, Neiva R. A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Study with Upto- 5-Year Follow-up Utilizing a Method that Enhances Bone Density and Allows for Transcrestal Sinus Augmentation Through Compaction Grafting. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant 2018;33:1305–1311.
]Search in Google Scholar