Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone - CBCT Study

1. López JP, Boix P, Sanchez PA, Boracchia A. Morphological Characterization of the Anterior Palatine Region Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; e459–64. LópezJP BoixP SanchezPA BoracchiaA Morphological Characterization of the Anterior Palatine Region Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 e459 64 Search in Google Scholar

2. Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED, Aktan AM. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019; 78(1): 153–162. BahşiI OrhanM KervancıoğluP YalçınED AktanAM Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019 78 1 153 162 Search in Google Scholar

3. Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Uribe R, García B. The nasopalatinecanal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in theseverely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2009; 24(5): 936–942. PeñarrochaM CarrilloC UribeR GarcíaB The nasopalatinecanal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in theseverely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2009 24 5 936 942 Search in Google Scholar

4. Costa EDD, Nejaim Y, Martins LAC, Peyneau PD, Ambrosano GMB, Oliveira ML. Morphological Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients With Different Facial Profiles and Ages. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; (4): 721–729. CostaEDD NejaimY MartinsLAC PeyneauPD AmbrosanoGMB OliveiraML Morphological Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients With Different Facial Profiles and Ages J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 4 721 729 Search in Google Scholar

5. Mardinger O, Namani SN, Chaushu G, Schwartz AD. Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 1659–1662. MardingerO NamaniSN ChaushuG SchwartzAD Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae J Periodontol. 2008 79 9 1659 1662 Search in Google Scholar

6. Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi, K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang, H.L, Tözüm TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (9): 1023–1026. GüncüGN YıldırımYD YılmazHG Galindo-MorenoP Velasco-TorresM Al-Hezaimi,K Al-ShawafR KarabulutE WangH.L TözümTF Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 24 9 1023 1026 Search in Google Scholar

7. Liang X, Jacobs R., Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, Lambrichts I. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36 (7): 598–603. LiangX JacobsR Martens W Hu Y Adriaensens P Quirynen M Lambrichts I Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal J Clin Periodontol. 2009 36 7 598 603 Search in Google Scholar

8. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36 (8): 805–812. EtozM SismanY Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 36 8 805 812 Search in Google Scholar

9. Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Rahimian S, Kheirkhahi M, Manouchehri, ME. Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomic Variations Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a Group of Iranian Population. Iran J Radiol. 2017; 14(1): e13480. SafiY MoshfeghiM RahimianS KheirkhahiM ManouchehriME Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomic Variations Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a Group of Iranian Population Iran J Radiol. 2017 14 1 e13480 Search in Google Scholar

10. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2016; 73(1): 84–102. BuserD ChappuisV BelserUC ChenS Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2016 73 1 84 102 Search in Google Scholar

11. Mounir M, Beheiri G, El-Beialy W. Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(11): 1373–1380. MounirM BeheiriG El-BeialyW Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 43 11 1373 1380 Search in Google Scholar

12. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontology 2000. 2018; 77(1): 197–212. KanJYK RungcharassaengK DeflorianM WeinsteinT WangHL TestoriT Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants Periodontology 2000. 2018 77 1 197 212 Search in Google Scholar

13. Al-Amery SM, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117251. Al-AmerySM NambiarP JamaludinM JohnJ NgeowWC Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants PLoS One. 2015 10 2 e0117251 Search in Google Scholar

14. Salemi F. Moghadam FA, Shakibai, Z, Farhadian M. Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J. Periodontol. Implant Dent. 2016; 8(1): 1–7. SalemiF Moghadam FA Shakibai Z Farhadian M Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography J. Periodontol. Implant Dent. 2016 8 1 1 7 Search in Google Scholar

15. Panda M, Shankar T, Raut A, Dev S, Kar AK, Hota S. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18(4): 356–363. PandaM ShankarT RautA DevS KarAK HotaS Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018 18 4 356 363 Search in Google Scholar

16. Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota, KR, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiol Res Pract. 2019; 2019: 6151253. SoumyaP KoppoluP PathakotaKR ChappidiV Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Radiol Res Pract. 2019 2019 6151253 Search in Google Scholar

17. Peñarrocha D, Candel E, Guirado JLC, Canullo L, Peñarrocha M. Implants Placed in the Nasopalatine Canal to Rehabilitate Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study with Long Follow-up. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40(6): 699–706. PeñarrochaD CandelE GuiradoJLC CanulloL PeñarrochaM Implants Placed in the Nasopalatine Canal to Rehabilitate Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study with Long Follow-up J Oral Implantol. 2014 40 6 699 706 Search in Google Scholar

18. McCrea SJJ. Aberrations Causing Neurovascular Damage in the Anterior Maxilla during Dental Implant Placement. Case Rep Dent. 2017; 2017: 5969643. McCreaSJJ Aberrations Causing Neurovascular Damage in the Anterior Maxilla during Dental Implant Placement Case Rep Dent. 2017 2017 5969643 Search in Google Scholar

19. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van CJ, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(6): 396–402. MraiwaN JacobsR VanCJ The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004 33 6 396 402 Search in Google Scholar

20. Canto G. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124(4): 432–440.e5. CantoG Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 124 4 432 440.e5 Search in Google Scholar

21. Wanner L, Ludwig U, Hövener JB, Nelson K, Flügge T. Magnetic resonance imaging-a diagnostic tool for postoperative evaluation of dental implants: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125(4): e103–e107. WannerL LudwigU HövenerJB NelsonK FlüggeT Magnetic resonance imaging-a diagnostic tool for postoperative evaluation of dental implants: a case report Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018 125 4 e103 e107 Search in Google Scholar

22. Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18(8): 665–669. SahotaJ BhatiaA GuptaM SinghV SoniJ SoniR Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 18 8 665 669 Search in Google Scholar

23. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1): 88. JacobsR SalmonB CodariM HassanB BornsteinMM Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use BMC Oral Health. 2018 18 1 88 Search in Google Scholar

24. Alkanderi A, Al Sakka Y, Koticha T, Li J, Masood F, Suárez-López Del Amo F. Incidence of nasopalatine canal perforation in relation to virtual implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22(1): 77–83. AlkanderiA Al SakkaY KotichaT LiJ MasoodF Suárez-López Del AmoF Incidence of nasopalatine canal perforation in relation to virtual implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 22 1 77 83 Search in Google Scholar

25. Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(4): 273–281. ThakurAR BurdeK GuttalK NaikmasurVG Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography Imaging Sci Dent. 2013 43 4 273 281 Search in Google Scholar

26. Kajan ZD, Kia J, Motevasseli S, Rezaian SR. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12(1): 14–19. KajanZD KiaJ MotevasseliS RezaianSR Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015 12 1 14 19 Search in Google Scholar

27. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, Soysal N, Cimbar M, Özbek M. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016; 97(11): 1165–1172. GönülY BucakA AtalayY Beker-AcayM ÇalişkanA SakaryaG SoysalN CimbarM ÖzbekM MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016 97 11 1165 1172 Search in Google Scholar

28. Hakbilen S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018; 77(3): 527–535. HakbilenS MagatG Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018 77 3 527 535 Search in Google Scholar