Gender Differences in the Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Anterior Maxillary Bone - CBCT Study

1. López JP, Boix P, Sanchez PA, Boracchia A. Morphological Characterization of the Anterior Palatine Region Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; e459-64.10.1111/cid.1227125263847Search in Google Scholar

2. Bahşi I, Orhan M, Kervancıoğlu P, Yalçın ED, Aktan AM. Anatomical evaluation of nasopalatine canal on cone beam computed tomography images. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2019; 78(1): 153-162.Search in Google Scholar

3. Peñarrocha M, Carrillo C, Uribe R, García B. The nasopalatinecanal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in theseverely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants. 2009; 24(5): 936-942.Search in Google Scholar

4. Costa EDD, Nejaim Y, Martins LAC, Peyneau PD, Ambrosano GMB, Oliveira ML. Morphological Evaluation of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients With Different Facial Profiles and Ages. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; (4): 721-729.10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.02530597135Search in Google Scholar

5. Mardinger O, Namani SN, Chaushu G, Schwartz AD. Morphologic Changes of the Nasopalatine Canal Related to Dental Implantation: A Radiologic Study in Different Degrees of Absorbed Maxillae. J Periodontol. 2008; 79 (9): 1659–1662.10.1902/jop.2008.08004318771366Search in Google Scholar

6. Güncü GN, Yıldırım YD, Yılmaz HG, Galindo-Moreno P, Velasco-Torres M, Al-Hezaimi, K, Al-Shawaf R, Karabulut E, Wang, H.L, Tözüm TF. Is there a gender difference in anatomic features of incisive canal and maxillary environmental bone? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013; 24 (9): 1023–1026.Search in Google Scholar

7. Liang X, Jacobs R., Martens W, Hu Y, Adriaensens P, Quirynen M, Lambrichts I. Macro- and micro-anatomical, histological and computed tomography scan characterization of the nasopalatine canal. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36 (7): 598–603.10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01429.x19538333Search in Google Scholar

8. Etoz M, Sisman Y. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal and variations with cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36 (8): 805–812.10.1007/s00276-014-1259-924488202Search in Google Scholar

9. Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Rahimian S, Kheirkhahi M, Manouchehri, ME. Assessment of Nasopalatine Canal Anatomic Variations Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a Group of Iranian Population. Iran J Radiol. 2017; 14(1): e13480.10.5812/iranjradiol.37028Search in Google Scholar

10. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: When immediate, when early, when late? Periodontology 2000. 2016; 73(1): 84–102.10.1111/prd.1217028000278Search in Google Scholar

11. Mounir M, Beheiri G, El-Beialy W. Assessment of marginal bone loss using full thickness versus partial thickness flaps for alveolar ridge splitting and immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 43(11): 1373–1380.10.1016/j.ijom.2014.05.02124973295Search in Google Scholar

12. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Deflorian M, Weinstein T, Wang HL, Testori T. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants. Periodontology 2000. 2018; 77(1): 197–212.10.1111/prd.1221229478284Search in Google Scholar

13. Al-Amery SM, Nambiar P, Jamaludin M, John J, Ngeow WC. Cone beam computed tomography assessment of the maxillary incisive canal and foramen: considerations of anatomical variations when placing immediate implants. PLoS One. 2015; 10(2): e0117251.10.1371/journal.pone.0117251433250225679505Search in Google Scholar

14. Salemi F. Moghadam FA, Shakibai, Z, Farhadian M. Three-dimensional Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Surrounding Bone Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography. J. Periodontol. Implant Dent. 2016; 8(1): 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Panda M, Shankar T, Raut A, Dev S, Kar AK, Hota S. Cone beam computerized tomography evaluation of incisive canal and anterior maxillary bone thickness for placement of immediate implants. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2018; 18(4): 356-363.10.4103/jips.jips_167_18618073530449964Search in Google Scholar

16. Soumya P, Koppolu P, Pathakota, KR, Chappidi V. Maxillary Incisive Canal Characteristics: A Radiographic Study Using Cone Beam Computerized Tomography. Radiol Res Pract. 2019; 2019: 6151253.10.1155/2019/6151253645730631032120Search in Google Scholar

17. Peñarrocha D, Candel E, Guirado JLC, Canullo L, Peñarrocha M. Implants Placed in the Nasopalatine Canal to Rehabilitate Severely Atrophic Maxillae: A Retrospective Study with Long Follow-up. J Oral Implantol. 2014; 40(6): 699–706.10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-0014523397941Search in Google Scholar

18. McCrea SJJ. Aberrations Causing Neurovascular Damage in the Anterior Maxilla during Dental Implant Placement. Case Rep Dent. 2017; 2017: 5969643.10.1155/2017/5969643553045528785491Search in Google Scholar

19. Mraiwa N, Jacobs R, Van CJ, et al. The nasopalatine canal revisited using 2D and 3D CT imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(6): 396–402.10.1259/dmfr/5380196915665234Search in Google Scholar

20. Canto G. Comparative analysis of imaging techniques for diagnostic accuracy of peri-implant bone defects: a meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017; 124(4): 432-440.e5.10.1016/j.oooo.2017.06.11928743664Search in Google Scholar

21. Wanner L, Ludwig U, Hövener JB, Nelson K, Flügge T. Magnetic resonance imaging-a diagnostic tool for postoperative evaluation of dental implants: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018; 125(4): e103-e107.10.1016/j.oooo.2018.01.00529501353Search in Google Scholar

22. Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017; 18(8): 665-669.10.5005/jp-journals-10024-210328816186Search in Google Scholar

23. Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1): 88.10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5595236529764458Search in Google Scholar

24. Alkanderi A, Al Sakka Y, Koticha T, Li J, Masood F, Suárez-López Del Amo F. Incidence of nasopalatine canal perforation in relation to virtual implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020; 22(1): 77-83.10.1111/cid.1285231829508Search in Google Scholar

25. Thakur AR, Burde K, Guttal K, Naikmasur VG. Anatomy and morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography. Imaging Sci Dent. 2013; 43(4): 273-281.10.5624/isd.2013.43.4.273387331624380067Search in Google Scholar

26. Kajan ZD, Kia J, Motevasseli S, Rezaian SR. Evaluation of the nasopalatine canal with cone-beam computed tomography in an Iranian population. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2015; 12(1): 14-19.10.4103/1735-3327.150289433696625709669Search in Google Scholar

27. Gönül Y, Bucak A, Atalay Y, Beker-Acay M, Çalişkan A, Sakarya G, Soysal N, Cimbar M, Özbek M. MDCT evaluation of nasopalatine canal morphometry and variations: An analysis of 100 patients. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016; 97(11): 1165-1172.10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.01226797526Search in Google Scholar

28. Hakbilen S, Magat G. Evaluation of anatomical and morphological characteristics of the nasopalatine canal in a Turkish population by cone beam computed tomography. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2018; 77(3): 527-535.10.5603/FM.a2018.001329399754Search in Google Scholar