This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Markey A, Loewenstein G. Curiosity. In: International handbook of emotions in education. Routledge; 2014. p. 238–55.MarkeyALoewensteinGCuriosityInternational handbook of emotions in educationRoutledge2014238–55Search in Google Scholar
Berlyne DE. A theory of human curiosity. Br J Psychol [Internet]. 1954 Aug;45(3):180–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954.tb01243.xBerlyneDEA theory of human curiosityBr J Psychol [Internet]195445318091Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954.tb01243.x10.1111/j.2044-8295.1954.tb01243.x13190171Search in Google Scholar
Day HI. The measurement of specific curiosity. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education; 1970.DayHIThe measurement of specific curiosityOntario Institute for Studies in Education;1970Search in Google Scholar
Berlyne DE. Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960.BerlyneDEConflict, arousal, and curiosityNew YorkMcGraw-Hill;196010.1037/11164-000Search in Google Scholar
Grossnickle EM. Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2016 Mar;28(1):23–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-yGrossnickleEMDisentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contextsEduc Psychol Rev [Internet]20162812360Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y10.1007/s10648-014-9294-ySearch in Google Scholar
Hebb DO. Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychol Rev. 1955;62(4):243.HebbDODrives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system)Psychol Rev195562424310.1037/h004182314395368Search in Google Scholar
Leuba C. Toward Some Integration of Learning Theories: The Concept of Optimal Stimulation. Psychol Rep [Internet]. 1955 Mar 1;1(1):27–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1955.1.g.27LeubaCToward Some Integration of Learning Theories: The Concept of Optimal StimulationPsychol Rep [Internet]1955Mar 1112733Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1955.1.g.2710.2466/pr0.1955.1.g.27Search in Google Scholar
Loewenstein G. The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychol Bull [Internet]. 1994 Jul;116(1):75–98. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75LoewensteinGThe psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretationPsychol Bull [Internet]199411617598Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.7510.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75Search in Google Scholar
Spielberger CD, Starr LM. Curiosity and exploratory behavior. Motivation: Theory and research. 1994;221–43.SpielbergerCDStarrLMCuriosity and exploratory behaviorMotivation: Theory and research1994221–43Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA. Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Pers Individ Dif [Internet]. 2008 May 1;44(7):1585–95. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886908000275LitmanJAInterest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosityPers Individ Dif [Internet]2008May 1447158595Available fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188690800027510.1016/j.paid.2008.01.014Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA. Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion [Internet]. 2005;19(6):793–814. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699930541000101LitmanJACuriosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new informationCognition and Emotion [Internet]2005196793814Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269993054100010110.1080/02699930541000101Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA, Spielberger CD. Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components. J Pers Assess [Internet]. 2003 Feb;80(1):75–86. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_16LitmanJASpielbergerCDMeasuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific componentsJ Pers Assess [Internet]20038017586Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_1610.1207/S15327752JPA8001_1612584070Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA, Jimerson TL. The measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivation. J Pers Assess [Internet]. 2004 Apr;82(2):147–57. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_3LitmanJAJimersonTLThe measurement of curiosity as a feeling of deprivationJ Pers Assess [Internet]200482214757Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8202_310.1207/s15327752jpa8202_315041521Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA, Silvia PJ. The latent structure of trait curiosity: evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensions. J Pers Assess [Internet]. 2006 Jun;86(3):318–28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_07LitmanJASilviaPJThe latent structure of trait curiosity: evidence for interest and deprivation curiosity dimensionsJ Pers Assess [Internet]200686331828Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8603_0710.1207/s15327752jpa8603_0716740115Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA, Crowson HM, Kolinski K. Validity of the Interest- and Deprivation-type epistemic curiosity distinction in non-students. Pers Individ Dif [Internet]. 2010 Oct 1;49(5):531–6. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886910002618LitmanJACrowsonHMKolinskiKValidity of the Interest- and Deprivation-type epistemic curiosity distinction in non-studentsPers Individ Dif [Internet]2010Oct 14955316Available fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188691000261810.1016/j.paid.2010.05.021Search in Google Scholar
Litman JA, Mussel P. Validity of the Interest-and Deprivation-Type Epistemic Curiosity Model in Germany. Journal of Individual Differences [Internet]. 2013 Jan 1;34(2):59–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000100LitmanJAMusselPValidity of the Interest-and Deprivation-Type Epistemic Curiosity Model in GermanyJournal of Individual Differences [Internet]2013Jan 13425968Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a00010010.1027/1614-0001/a000100Search in Google Scholar
Huang D, Wang L, Zhou M, Zhang J. Gender difference in motives of knowledge searching: Measurement invariance and factor mean comparison of the interest/deprivation epistemic curiosity. In: 2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society [Internet]. 2010. p. 258–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SWS.2010.5607444HuangDWangLZhouMZhangJGender difference in motives of knowledge searching: Measurement invariance and factor mean comparison of the interest/deprivation epistemic curiosity2010 IEEE 2nd Symposium on Web Society [Internet]. 2010. p. 258–63Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SWS.2010.560744410.1109/SWS.2010.5607444Search in Google Scholar
Piotrowski JT, Litman JA, Valkenburg P. Measuring Epistemic Curiosity in Young Children: Brief Report. Infant Child Dev [Internet]. 2014 Sep 19;23(5):542–53. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/icd.1847PiotrowskiJTLitmanJAValkenburgPMeasuring Epistemic Curiosity in Young Children: Brief ReportInfant Child Dev [Internet]2014Sep 1923554253Available fromhttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/icd.184710.1002/icd.1847Search in Google Scholar
Gerholm T, Kallioinen P, Tonér S, Frankenberg S, Kjällander S, Palmer A, et al. A randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of two teaching methods on preschool children’s language and communication, executive functions, socioemotional comprehension, and early math skills. BMC Psychol [Internet]. 2019 Sep 5;7(1):59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0325-9GerholmTKallioinenPTonérSFrankenbergSKjällanderSPalmerAet alA randomized controlled trial to examine the effect of two teaching methods on preschool children’s language and communication, executive functions, socioemotional comprehension, and early math skillsBMC Psychol [Internet]2019Sep 57159Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-019-0325-910.1186/s40359-019-0325-9672900331488204Search in Google Scholar
Meade AW, Craig SB. Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychol Methods [Internet]. 2012 Sep;17(3):437–55. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028085MeadeAWCraigSBIdentifying careless responses in survey dataPsychol Methods [Internet]201217343755Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a002808510.1037/e518362013-127Search in Google Scholar
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol [Internet]. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417–32. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8263569GuilleminFBombardierCBeatonDCross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelinesJ Clin Epidemiol [Internet]19934612141732Available fromhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/826356910.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N8263569Search in Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/R Core TeamR: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]Vienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical Computing2017Available fromhttps://www.R-project.org/Search in Google Scholar
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, Articles [Internet]. 2012;48(2):1–36. Available from: https://www.jstatsoft.org/v048/i02RosseelYlavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation ModelingJournal of Statistical Software, Articles [Internet]2012482136Available fromhttps://www.jstatsoft.org/v048/i0210.18637/jss.v048.i02Search in Google Scholar
Revelle W. psych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research [Software] [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychRevelleWpsych: Procedures for Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research [Software] [Internet]2016Available fromhttps://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychSearch in Google Scholar
Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess [Internet]. 1995;7(3):309. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309ClarkLAWatsonDConstructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale developmentPsychol Assess [Internet]199573309Available fromhttps://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.30910.1037/14805-012Search in Google Scholar
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.HairJFBlackWCBabinBJAndersonRETathamRLMultivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle RiverNJPearson Prentice Hall2006Search in Google Scholar
Flora DB, Curran PJ. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychol Methods [Internet]. 2004 Dec;9(4):466–91. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466FloraDBCurranPJAn empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal dataPsychol Methods [Internet]20049446691Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.46610.1037/1082-989X.9.4.466315336215598100Search in Google Scholar
Chalmers RP. On Misconceptions and the Limited Usefulness of Ordinal Alpha. Educ Psychol Meas [Internet]. 2018 Dec;78(6):1056–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164417727036ChalmersRPOn Misconceptions and the Limited Usefulness of Ordinal AlphaEduc Psychol Meas [Internet]2018786105671Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001316441772703610.1177/0013164417727036629341530559513Search in Google Scholar
James L, Mulaik S, Brett JM. Causal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage in cooperation with Divison 14 of the American Psychological Association; 1982.JamesLMulaikSBrettJMCausal analysis: Assumptions, models, and data. Beverly Hills: Sage in cooperation with Divison 14 of the American Psychological Association;1982Search in Google Scholar
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling [Internet]. 1999 Jan 1;6(1):1–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118HuLBentlerPMCutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStruct Equ Modeling [Internet]1999Jan 161155Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118Search in Google Scholar
MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods [Internet]. 1996;1(2):130. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1996-04469-002.htmlMacCallumRCBrowneMWSugawaraHMPower analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelingPsychol Methods [Internet]199612130Available fromhttps://psycnet.apa.org/fulltext/1996-04469-002.html10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130Search in Google Scholar
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. [Б. и.] London; 1998.ByrneBMStructural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS. [Б. и.]London1998Search in Google Scholar
Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Introducing LISREL: A Guide for the Uninitiated. SAGE; 2013.JDiamantopoulosASiguawJAIntroducing LISREL: A Guide for the UninitiatedSAGE2013.JSearch in Google Scholar
Hatcher L, Stepanski EJ. A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statistics. SAS Institute; 1994.HatcherLStepanskiEJA step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for univariate and multivariate statisticsSAS Institute1994Search in Google Scholar
Steiger JH. Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Pers Individ Dif [Internet]. 2007 May 1;42(5):893–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017SteigerJHUnderstanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelingPers Individ Dif [Internet]2007May 14258938Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.01710.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017Search in Google Scholar
Renninger KA, Hidi SE. The power of interest for motivation and engagement. and Suzanne Hidi. Description: New York, NY: Routledge, 2016. In: Routledge; 2015.RenningerKAHidiSEThe power of interest for motivation and engagement. and Suzanne Hidi. DescriptionNew York, NYRoutledge2016In: Routledge; 201510.4324/9781315771045Search in Google Scholar
Silvia PJ. Exploring the psychology of interest. Oxford University Press; 2006.SilviaPJExploring the psychology of interestOxford University Press200610.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158557.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Pekrun R. The murky distinction between curiosity and interest: State of the art and future prospects. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2019 Dec;31(4):905–14. Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09512-1PekrunRThe murky distinction between curiosity and interest: State of the art and future prospectsEduc Psychol Rev [Internet]201931490514Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09512-110.1007/s10648-019-09512-1Search in Google Scholar
Hidi SE, Renninger KA. Interest Development and Its Relation to Curiosity: Needed Neuroscientific Research. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1;31(4):833–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09491-3HidiSERenningerKAInterest Development and Its Relation to Curiosity: Needed Neuroscientific ResearchEduc Psychol Rev [Internet]2019Dec 131483352Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09491-310.1007/s10648-019-09491-3Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI. Epistemic Curiosity and Situational Interest: Distant Cousins or Identical Twins? Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2020 Jun 6; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09539-9SchmidtHGRotgansJIEpistemic Curiosity and Situational Interest: Distant Cousins or Identical Twins? Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]2020Jun 6; Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09539-910.1007/s10648-020-09539-9Search in Google Scholar
Ainley M. Curiosity and Interest: Emergence and Divergence. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1;31(4):789–806. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09495-zAinleyMCuriosity and Interest: Emergence and DivergenceEduc Psychol Rev [Internet]2019Dec 1314789806Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09495-z10.1007/s10648-019-09495-zSearch in Google Scholar
Peterson EG, Hidi S. Curiosity and interest: current perspectives. Educ Psychol Rev [Internet]. 2019 Dec 1;31(4):781–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09513-0PetersonEGHidiSCuriosity and interest: current perspectivesEduc Psychol Rev [Internet]2019Dec 13147818Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09513-010.1007/s10648-019-09513-0Search in Google Scholar
Kreitler S, Zigler E, Kreitler H. The nature of curiosity in children. J Sch Psychol [Internet]. 1975 Sep 1;13(3):185–200. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022440575900023KreitlerSZiglerEKreitlerHThe nature of curiosity in childrenJ Sch Psychol [Internet]1975Sep 1133185200Available fromhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002244057590002310.1016/0022-4405(75)90002-3Search in Google Scholar
Schulz LE. The origins of inquiry: inductive inference and exploration in early childhood. Trends Cogn Sci [Internet]. 2012 Jul;16(7):382–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.004SchulzLEThe origins of inquiry: inductive inference and exploration in early childhoodTrends Cogn Sci [Internet]20121673829Available fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.00410.1016/j.tics.2012.06.00422721579Search in Google Scholar