Otwarty dostęp

Assessment of spread foundation settlement using statistical determination of characteristic values of subsoil properties

,  oraz   
12 maj 2025

Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę

Figure 1:

View of building No. 34 at the campus of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. https://wzim.sggw.edu.pl/wydzial/
View of building No. 34 at the campus of the Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW. https://wzim.sggw.edu.pl/wydzial/

Figure 2:

View of the pad footings of building No. 34 – location of test points: CPT – cone penetration test, DMT – dilatometer test, SG – settlement gauge.
View of the pad footings of building No. 34 – location of test points: CPT – cone penetration test, DMT – dilatometer test, SG – settlement gauge.

Figure 3:

Profiles of cone resistance qc, sleeve friction fs, and friction ratio Rf from CPT.CPTs = cone penetration tests
Profiles of cone resistance qc, sleeve friction fs, and friction ratio Rf from CPT.CPTs = cone penetration tests

Figure 4:

Profiles of material index ID, horizontal stress index KD, and dilatometer modulus ED from DMT.DMTs = dilatometer tests
Profiles of material index ID, horizontal stress index KD, and dilatometer modulus ED from DMT.DMTs = dilatometer tests

Figure 5:

Profiles of cumulative values Σqc from CPTs and cumulative values ΣED from DMTs below the foundation level.CPTs = cone penetration tests, DMTs = dilatometer tests
Profiles of cumulative values Σqc from CPTs and cumulative values ΣED from DMTs below the foundation level.CPTs = cone penetration tests, DMTs = dilatometer tests

Figure 6:

Relationship between factor RM and horizontal stress index KD. R2 = determination coefficient.
Relationship between factor RM and horizontal stress index KD. R2 = determination coefficient.

Figure 7:

Comparison of measured and calculated settlements based on the constrained modulus determined from: a – CPT tests; b – DMT tests.CPTs = cone penetration tests, DMTs = dilatometer tests
Comparison of measured and calculated settlements based on the constrained modulus determined from: a – CPT tests; b – DMT tests.CPTs = cone penetration tests, DMTs = dilatometer tests

Index properties of the analyzed boulder clays and thickness of layers and sublayers_

Properties\thickness Boulder clay (brown) III layer Boulder clay (gray) IV layer IVa (m) IVb (m) IVc (m)
Water content wn (%) 10.0–11.0 10.5–13.5
Unit density ρ (t·m−3) 2.1–2.2 2.1–2.2
Liquid limit wL (%) 21.0–24.9 22.0–26.0
Plasticity index IP (%) 11.0–13.0 12.0–14.0
Consistency index IC (−) 0.93–1.0 0.89–0.96
Content of fraction (%):
Sand (0.063–2 mm) Sa 62–63 56–59
Silt (0.002–0.063 mm) Si 25–28 28–29
Clay (≤0.002 mm) Cl 10–12 13–15
The thickness of layers and sublayers below the foundation level (m) (depth of foundation level = 4.4 m below ground level) CPTs 0.8–1.0 5.2
1.2 1.6 2.4
DMTs 1.0 1.8 2.4

Results of statistical analysis of the dilatometer modulus ED and the constrained modulus M from DMTs_

Test type/measure Layers Number of determinations n (−) Mean value Xmean (kPa) Min. value Xmin (kPa) Max. value Xmax (kPa) Standard deviation Sx (kPa) Coefficient of variation Vx (−)
DMT: ED III + IV together 137 55,527 16,214 116,592 19,621 0.353
DMT: M 117,863 26,676 273,266 53,331 0.452
DMT: ED III 20 85,336 16,214 116,592 20,287 0.238
DMT: M 201,715 26,676 273,266 51,754 0.257
DMT: ED IV 117 50,432 23,683 87,444 14,233 0.282
DMT: M 103,529 40,265 205,619 38,277 0.370
DMT: ED IVa 20 68,106 45,544 87,444 11,218 0.165
DMT: M 157,888 105,708 205,619 26,800 0.170
DMT: ED IVb 36 54,552 29,039 74,582 11,225 0.206
DMT: M 115,362 52,880 164,621 27,986 0.243
DMT: ED IVc 61 42,205 23,683 60,118 9,634 0.228
DMT: M 78,724 40,265 117,792 21,111 0.268

Results of statistical analysis of cone resistance qc and constrained modulus M from CPT_

Test type/measure Layers Number of determinations n (−) Mean value Xmean (kPa) Min. value Xmin (kPa) Max. value Xmax (kPa) Standard deviation Sx (kPa) Coefficient of variation Vx (−)
CPT: qc III + IV together 104 11,098 2,500 17,000 3,666 0.333
CPT: M 90,498 19,866 139,524 30,329 0.335
CPT: qc III 15 8,493 2,500 16,000 3,773 0.444
CPT: M 69,384 19,866 131,175 31,093 0.448
CPT: qc IV 89 11,537 5,200 17,000 3,459 0.300
CPT: M 94,056 41,349 139,524 28,707 0.305
CPT: qc IVa 23 13,857 6,600 17,000 2,751 0.199
CPT: M 113,710 53,658 139,524 22,303 0.197
CPT: qc IVb 31 13,661 10,000 17,000 2,100 0.154
CPT: M 111,646 81,312 139,326 17,343 0.155
CPT: qc IVc 35 8,217 5,200 13,000 1,872 0.228
CPT: M 66,428 41,349 105,996 15,509 0.233

Characteristic values of the constrained modulus M from CPTs and DMTs and the calculated and measured settlements of pad footing H-16_

Test type Layers Settlement calculated using sm (mm)

Mmean Bayesian statistics Schneider's formula prEN 1997-1:2022-09

Mmean (kPa) Σscal (mm) Mmean (kPa) Σscal (mm) Mk (kPa) Σscal (mm) Vx (−) kn (1 − knVx) Mk (kPa) Σscal (mm)
CPT III + IV together 90,498 7.8 90,498 7.8 75,261 9.4 0.335 1.67 0.441 39,910 17.7 7.0
III 69,384 50,020 53,292 0.448 1.82 0.185 12,840 - -
IV 94,056 8.3 100,900 9.1 79,621 10.2 0.305 1.68 0.488 45,899 27.4 7.0
III 69,384 50,020 53,292 0.448 1.82 0.185 12,840 - -
IVa 113,043 125,079 101,420 0.197 1.75 0.655 74,480 - -
IVb 111,221 115,218 102,460 0.155 1.73 0.732 81,410 - -
IVc 66,428 8.2 66,688 9.1 58,560 9.6 0.233 1.71 0.602 39,990 24.4 7.0
DMT III + IV together 117,863 6.0 117,863 6.0 91,100 7.8 0.452 1.67 0.245 28,876 24.5 7.0
III 201,715 195,768 175,165 0.257 1.77 0.545 109,935 - -
IV 103,529 5.8 104,441 5.8 84,309 7.1 0.370 1.67 0.382 39,548 14.4 7.0
III 201.715 195,768 175,165 0.257 1.77 0.545 109,935 - -
IVa 157,887 154,300 144,139 0.170 1.77 0.699 110,364 - -
IVb 115,361 118,200 101,117 0.243 1.71 0.584 67,371 - -
IVc 78,724 5.3 81,241 5.3 68,080 6.1 0.268 1.68 0.550 43,298 9.1 7.0