[
Abbate, E., Sammartano, G., and Spanò, A. (2019). Prospective upon multi-source urban scale data for 3D documentation and monitoring of urban legacies. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W11:11–19, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w11-11-2019.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agrawal, M., Konolige, K., and Blas, M. R. (2008). Censure: Center surround extremas for realtime feature detection and matching. In European conference on computer vision, pages 102–115. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88693-8_8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arif, R. and Essa, K. (2017). Evolving techniques of documentation of a world heritage site in Lahore. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-2/W5:33–40, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-2-w5-33-2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bae, K.-H. and Lichti, D. D. (2008). A method for automated registration of unorganised point clouds. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 63(1):36–54, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.05.012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., and Van Gool, L. (2006). SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features, pages 404–417. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/11744023_32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bianco, S., Ciocca, G., and Marelli, D. (2018). Evaluating the performance of Structure from Motion pipelines. Journal of Imaging, 4(8):98, doi:10.3390/jimaging4080098.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, P. and Straßer, W. (2003). The normal distributions transform: A new approach to laser scan matching. In Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003)(Cat. No. 03CH37453), volume 3, pages 2743–2748. IEEE, doi:10.1109/IROS.2003.1249285.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boehler, W., Vicent, M. B., Marbs, A., et al. (2003). Investigating laser scanner accuracy. The international archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, 34(Part 5):696–701.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bosché, F. (2010). Automated recognition of 3D CAD model objects in laser scans and calculation of as-built dimensions for dimensional compliance control in construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 24(1):107–118, doi:10.1016/j.aei.2009.08.006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canny, J. (1986). A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8(6):679–698, doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y., Chen, Y., and Wang, G. (2019). Bundle adjustment revisited. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1912.03858.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cheng, L., Chen, S., Liu, X., Xu, H., Wu, Y., Li, M., and Chen, Y. (2018). Registration of laser scanning point clouds: A review. Sensors, 18(5):1641, doi:10.3390/s18051641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cloudcompare (2024). CloudCompare project. https://cloudcompare-org.danielgm.net/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Das, A. and Waslander, S. L. (2012). Scan registration with multi-scale k-means normal distributions transform. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6386185.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dong, Z., Yang, B., Liang, F., Huang, R., and Scherer, S. (2018). Hierarchical registration of unordered TLS point clouds based on binary shape context descriptor. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144:61–79, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.06.018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischler, M. A. and Bolles, R. C. (1981). Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model ~tting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24(6):381–395, doi:10.1145/358669.358692.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giżyńska, J., Komorowska, E., and Kowalczyk, M. (2022). The comparison of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods in the documentation of small cultural heritage object – case study. Journal of Modern Technologies for Cultural Heritage Preservation, 1(1), doi:10.33687/jmtchp.001.01.0013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guo, Y., Sohel, F., Bennamoun, M., Lu, M., and Wan, J. (2013). Rotational projection statistics for 3D local surface description and object recognition. International Journal of Computer Vision, 105(1):63–86, doi:10.1007/s11263-013-0627-y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, C. and Stephens, M. (1988). A combined corner and edge detector. In Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988, AVC 1988. Alvey Vision Club, doi:10.5244/c.2.23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hekimoglu, S., Demirel, H., and Aydin, C. (2002). Reliability of the conventional deformation analysis methods for vertical networks. In FIG XXII International Congress, pages 1–13. International Federation of Surveyors Washington, DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karwel, A. K. and Markiewicz, J. (2022). The methodology of the archival aerial image orientation based on the SfM method. Sensors and Machine Learning Applications, 1(2), doi:10.55627/smla.001.02.0015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Łapiński, S. (2011). Method of network reliability analysis based on accuracy characteristics. Reports on Geodesy, 90(1):265–270.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leutenegger, S., Chli, M., and Siegwart, R. Y. (2011). BRISK: Binary robust invariant scalable keypoints. In 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126542.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowe, D. (1999). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, doi:10.1109/iccv.1999.790410.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowe, D. G. (2004). Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(2):91–110, doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lu-Xingchang and Liu-Xianlin (2006). Reconstruction of 3D Model Based on Laser Scanning, pages 317–332. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-36998-1_25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markiewicz, J., Łapiński, S., Bocheńska, A., and Kot, P. (2021). The reliability assessment of the TLS registration methods – the case study of the Royal Castle in Warsaw. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B2-2021:855–861, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b2-2021-855-2021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markiewicz, J., Kot, P., Markiewicz, u., and Muradov, M. (2023). The evaluation of hand-crafted and learned-based features in Terrestrial Laser Scanning-Structure-from-Motion (TLS-SfM) indoor point cloud registration: the case study of cultural heritage objects and public interiors. Heritage Science, 11(1), doi:10.1186/s40494-023-01099-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markiewicz, J. and Zawieska, D. (2019). The in˚uence of the cartographic transformation of TLS data on the quality of the automatic registration. Applied Sciences, 9(3):509, doi:10.3390/app9030509.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Markiewicz, J. S. (2016). The use of computer vision algorithms for automatic orientation of Terrestrial Laser Scanning data. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B3:315–322, doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-xli-b3-315-2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moisan, L. and Stival, B. (2004). A probabilistic criterion to detect rigid point matches between two images and estimate the fundamental matrix. International Journal of Computer Vision, 57(3):201–218, doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000013094.38752.54.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moussa, W. (2014). Integration of digital photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning for cultural heritage data recording. PhD thesis, University Of Stuttgart, Germany.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mukupa, W., Roberts, G. W., Hancock, C. M., and Al-Manasir, K. (2016). A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures. Survey Review, pages 1–18, doi:10.1080/00396265.2015.1133039.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muradov, M., Kot, P., Markiewicz, J., Łapiński, S., Tobiasz, A., Onisk, K., Shaw, A., Hashim, K., Zawieska, D., and Mohi-Ud-Din, G. (2022). Non-destructive system for in-wall moisture assessment of cultural heritage buildings. Measurement, 203:111930, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111930.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nowak, E. and Odziemczyk, W. (2018). Adjustment of observation accuracy harmonisation parameters in optimising the network’s reliability. Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics, 105(1):53–59, doi:10.2478/rgg-2018-0006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pavlov, A. L., Ovchinnikov, G. V., Derbyshev, D. Y., Tsetserukou, D., and Oseledets, I. V. (2017). AA-ICP: Iterative Closest Point with Anderson Acceleration. 2018 IEEE International Conference On Robotics And Automation (ICRA), doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1709.05479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pomerleau, F., Colas, F., and Siegwart, R. (2015). A review of point cloud registration algorithms for mobile robotics. Foundations and Trends in Robotics, 4(1):1–104, doi:10.1561/2300000035.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prószyński, W. and Łapiński, S. (2018). Reliability analysis for non-distorting connection of engineering survey networks. Survey Review, 51(366):219–224, doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1425605.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rashidi, M., Mohammadi, M., Sadeghlou Kivi, S., Abdolvand, M. M., Truong-Hong, L., and Samali, B. (2020). A decade of modern bridge monitoring using Terrestrial Laser Scanning: Review and future directions. Remote Sensing, 12(22):3796, doi:10.3390/rs12223796.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rofatto, V. F., Matsuoka, M. T., Klein, I., Veronez, M. R., Bonimani, M. L., and Lehmann, R. (2018). A half-century of baarda’s concept of reliability: a review, new perspectives, and applications. Survey Review, 52(372):261–277, doi:10.1080/00396265.2018.1548118.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosten, E. and Drummond, T. (2006). Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection, pages 430–443. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/11744023_34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salvi, J., Matabosch, C., Fo~, D., and Forest, J. (2007). A review of recent range image registration methods with accuracy evaluation. Image and Vision computing, 25(5):578–596, doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.05.012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Staiger, R. (2005). The geometrical quality of Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS). In Proceedings of FIG Working Week and GSDI-8, Cairo, Egypt, pages 1–11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takeuchi, E. and Tsubouchi, T. (2006). A 3-D scan matching using improved 3-D normal distributions transform for mobile robotic mapping. In 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, doi:10.1109/iros.2006.282246.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., and Rosin, P. L. (2013). Registration of 3D point clouds and meshes: A survey from rigid to nonrigid. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(7):1199–1217, doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.310.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tazir, M. L., Gokhool, T., Checchin, P., Malaterre, L., and Trassoudaine, L. (2019). Cluster ICP: Towards sparse to dense registration. In Intelligent Autonomous Systems 15. IAS 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, volume 867, pages 730–747. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01370-7_57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tobiasz, Markiewicz, Łapiński, Nikel, Kot, and Muradov (2019). Review of methods for documentation, management, and sustainability of cultural heritage. Case Study: Museum of King Jan III’s Palace at Wilanów. Sustainability, 11(24):7046, doi:10.3390/su11247046.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tola, E., Lepetit, V., and Fua, P. (2010). DAISY: An efficient dense descriptor applied to wide-baseline stereo. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 32(5):815–830, doi:10.1109/tpami.2009.77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuytelaars, T. and Mikolajczyk, K. (2007). Local invariant feature detectors: A survey. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision, 3(3):177–280, doi:10.1561/0600000017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urban, S. and Weinmann, M. (2015). Finding a good feature detector-descriptor combination for the 2D keypoint-based registration of TLS point clouds. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-3/W5:121–128, doi:10.5194/isprsannals-ii-3-w5-121-2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vacca, G., Mistretta, F., Stochino, F., and Dessi, A. (2016). Terrestrial laser scanner for monitoring the deformations and the damages of buildings. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLI-B5:453–460, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-xli-b5-453-2016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, W., Zhao, W., Huang, L., Vimarlund, V., and Wang, Z. (2014). Applications of terrestrial laser scanning for tunnels: a review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 1(5):325–337, doi:10.1016/s2095-7564(15)30279-8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Weinmann, M. (2016). From Irregularly Distributed 3D Points To Object Classes. Reconstruction And Analysis Of 3D Scenes. Springer International Publishing, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-29246-5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wojtkowska, M., Kedzierski, M., and Delis, P. (2021). Validation of terrestrial laser scanning and arti~-cial intelligence for measuring deformations of cultural heritage structures. Measurement, 167:108291, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108291.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, Y., Boerner, R., Yao, W., Hoegner, L., and Stilla, U. (2019). Pairwise coarse registration of point clouds in urban scenes using voxel-based 4-planes congruent sets. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 151:106–123, doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yu, G. and Morel, J.-M. (2011). ASIFT: An algorithm for fully affine invariant comparison. Image Processing On Line, 1:11–38, doi:10.5201/ipol.2011.my-asift.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Z+F (2024). Zoller + Fröhlich. https://www.zofre.de/en/.
]Search in Google Scholar