Otwarty dostęp

Emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization in gynecology and obstetrics - a retrospective analysis

Polona Vihtelic

Polona Vihtelic

  • Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Vihtelic, Polona
, 
Eva Skuk

Eva Skuk

  • Faculty of Medicine, University of LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
  • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Skuk, Eva
, 
Natasa Kenda Suster

Natasa Kenda Suster

  • Faculty of Medicine, University of LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
  • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Suster, Natasa Kenda
, 
Marina Jakimovska Stefanovska

Marina Jakimovska Stefanovska

  • Faculty of Medicine, University of LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
  • Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Stefanovska, Marina Jakimovska
 oraz 
Peter Popovic

Peter Popovic

  • Clinical Institute of Radiology, University Medical Centre LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
  • Faculty of Medicine, University of LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia
Wyszukaj tego autora
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Popovic, Peter
  
15 wrz 2024
Emergency and prophylactic uterine artery embolization in gynecology and obstetrics - a retrospective analysis's Cover Image
O artykule
Poprzedni artykuł
Następny artykuł
Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę
Kategoria artykułu: Research Article
Data publikacji: 15 wrz 2024
Zakres stron: 397 - 405
Otrzymano: 21 lut 2024
Przyjęty: 21 cze 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0037
Słowa kluczowe
© 2024 Polona Vihtelic et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figure 1.

Patient distribution for prophylactic and emergency uterine artery embolization (UAE).
Patient distribution for prophylactic and emergency uterine artery embolization (UAE).

Figure 2.

(A) Transvaginal ultrasonography in a 34-year-old female with vaginal bleeding after spontaneous termination of pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. Color Doppler ultrasound showed a 45 x 30 mm mass in the uterus with increased vascularity suggestive of retained products of conception. (B) Pelvic arteriogram demonstrating numerous spiral arteries in the uterus fed by both right and left uterine arteries, confirming the diagnosis of RPOC. (C) Left uterine arteriogram in the same patient before prophylactic embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge particles showing numerous spiral arteries. Postembolization left (D) and right (E) uterine arteriogram demonstrating successful embolization. Subsequently, surgical resection of retained products of conception was successfully performed.
(A) Transvaginal ultrasonography in a 34-year-old female with vaginal bleeding after spontaneous termination of pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. Color Doppler ultrasound showed a 45 x 30 mm mass in the uterus with increased vascularity suggestive of retained products of conception. (B) Pelvic arteriogram demonstrating numerous spiral arteries in the uterus fed by both right and left uterine arteries, confirming the diagnosis of RPOC. (C) Left uterine arteriogram in the same patient before prophylactic embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge particles showing numerous spiral arteries. Postembolization left (D) and right (E) uterine arteriogram demonstrating successful embolization. Subsequently, surgical resection of retained products of conception was successfully performed.

Figure 3.

(A) Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in a 35-year-old woman with singleton pregnancy at the 33rd week of gestation with suspected placenta accrete. The placenta covers the whole anterior part of the uterine wall. On T2-weighted MR images, there is marked thinning of the myometrium at the placental-myometrial interface, with MRI signs of placenta accrete and placenta increta. On the left cranial part of the junction, there is suspected placental invasion through the entire uterine wall, suspicious for placenta percreta. (B-E) Selective uterine angiography and embolization following delivery in the same 35-year-old woman with placenta accrete. Left (B) and right (D) uterine angiogram confirming the diagnosis of RPOC with numerous voluminous spiral arteries before prophylactic embolization. Left (C) and right (E) post-embolization angiogram after successful selective uterine artery embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge particles to reduce vascularity prior to surgical removal. After embolization, the placental tissue was successfully resected, and hysterectomy was prevented.
(A) Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging in a 35-year-old woman with singleton pregnancy at the 33rd week of gestation with suspected placenta accrete. The placenta covers the whole anterior part of the uterine wall. On T2-weighted MR images, there is marked thinning of the myometrium at the placental-myometrial interface, with MRI signs of placenta accrete and placenta increta. On the left cranial part of the junction, there is suspected placental invasion through the entire uterine wall, suspicious for placenta percreta. (B-E) Selective uterine angiography and embolization following delivery in the same 35-year-old woman with placenta accrete. Left (B) and right (D) uterine angiogram confirming the diagnosis of RPOC with numerous voluminous spiral arteries before prophylactic embolization. Left (C) and right (E) post-embolization angiogram after successful selective uterine artery embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge particles to reduce vascularity prior to surgical removal. After embolization, the placental tissue was successfully resected, and hysterectomy was prevented.

Clinical overview of the emergency uterine artery embolization (UAE) group

EMERGENCY UAE Number of cases Intervention Blood loss during gynecological procedure Hysterectomy
DURING PREGNANCY TERMINATION
Hemorrhage 3 Pregnancy termination → hemorrhage → embolization 2x 300 mL 1x 1,000 mL 0
DURING DELIVERY
Uterine atony 10 Hemorrhage after vaginal/Cesarean delivery → intrauterine balloon tamponade → embolization 8x < 1,000 mL 1x > 2,000 mL 1x > 3,000 mL 2
Placental abnormalities 5 Hemorrhage after vaginal/Cesarean delivery → intrauterine balloon tamponade → embolization < 800 mL 0

Clinical overview of the prophylactic uterine artery embolization (UAE) group

PROPHYLACTIC UAE Number of cases Intervention Blood loss during gynecological procedure Hysterectomy
BEFORE PREGNANCY TERMINATION
Fetal anomalies accompanied by placental abnormalities 5 Embolization → pregnancy termination 300 –400 mL(median 300 mL) 0
Cervical pregnancy 4 Embolization → pregnancy termination 100 –400 mL (median 250 mL) 0
BEFORE DELIVERY
Placental abnormalities with or without fetal anomalies 8 Embolization → vaginal/cesarean delivery 200 –1,800 mL (median 400 mL) 0
AFTER PREGNANCY TERMINATION
Retained products of conception (RPOC) 21 Embolization → surgical removal of RPOC 100 – 400 mL 0
AFTER DELIVERY
Retained products of conception RPOC 8 Embolization → surgical removal of RPOC 100 – 500 mL 0
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Medycyna, Medycyna kliniczna, Medycyna wewnętrzna, Hematologia, onkologia, Radiologia
Kanał RSS czasopisma