The equivalence of different types of electric pulses for electrochemotherapy with cisplatin − an in vitro study
, , , , oraz
21 lut 2024
O artykule
Kategoria artykułu: Research Article
Data publikacji: 21 lut 2024
Zakres stron: 51 - 66
Otrzymano: 20 lis 2023
Przyjęty: 05 gru 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0005
Słowa kluczowe
© 2024 Maria Scuderi et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 5.

Model parameters
Electroporation threshold voltage | 258 mV | ||
Membrane thickness | 5 nm | ||
Cell radius | 7.5 μm | ||
Membrane time constant | 1 µs | ||
Membrane permittivity | 12 × 8.85 × 10−12 F/m | ||
Solute radius | 0.58 nm | ||
Defect radius | 0.8 nm | ||
Solute radius/Defect radius | 0.7250 | ||
Solute diffusivity | 1.670 × 10−9 m2/s | ||
Parameter in N formation rate | 2 × 10−6 | ||
N relaxation rate | 4 × 10−8 | ||
Relative permeabilzed conductance | 1 × 106 | ||
Parameter in M formation rate | 1 × 10−3 | ||
M relaxation rate | 4 × 10−9 | ||
Permeability coefficient | 8.45 × 10−4 | ||
Electroporation medium conductivity | 1.4 S/m |