The equivalence of different types of electric pulses for electrochemotherapy with cisplatin − an in vitro study
, , , , und
21. Feb. 2024
Über diesen Artikel
Artikel-Kategorie: Research Article
Online veröffentlicht: 21. Feb. 2024
Seitenbereich: 51 - 66
Eingereicht: 20. Nov. 2023
Akzeptiert: 05. Dez. 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2024-0005
Schlüsselwörter
© 2024 Maria Scuderi et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 5.

Model parameters
Electroporation threshold voltage | 258 mV | ||
Membrane thickness | 5 nm | ||
Cell radius | 7.5 μm | ||
Membrane time constant | 1 µs | ||
Membrane permittivity | 12 × 8.85 × 10−12 F/m | ||
Solute radius | 0.58 nm | ||
Defect radius | 0.8 nm | ||
Solute radius/Defect radius | 0.7250 | ||
Solute diffusivity | 1.670 × 10−9 m2/s | ||
Parameter in N formation rate | 2 × 10−6 | ||
N relaxation rate | 4 × 10−8 | ||
Relative permeabilzed conductance | 1 × 106 | ||
Parameter in M formation rate | 1 × 10−3 | ||
M relaxation rate | 4 × 10−9 | ||
Permeability coefficient | 8.45 × 10−4 | ||
Electroporation medium conductivity | 1.4 S/m |