‘Cittaslow’: An Alternative Model for Local Sustainable Development or Just a Myth? Empirical Evidence in the Case of Tarakli (Turkey)
Öznur Akgiş İlhan
Department of Geography, Ahi Evran UniversityKırşehir, Turkey
Profil OrcidWyszukaj tego autora
, Erdal Karakaş
Department of Geography, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali UniversityBilecik, Turkey
Profil OrcidWyszukaj tego autora
oraz Büşra Özkaraman
Department of Geography, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali UniversityBilecik, Turkey
Profil OrcidWyszukaj tego autora
18 gru 2020
O artykule
Data publikacji: 18 gru 2020
Zakres stron: 23 - 37
Otrzymano: 10 sty 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0029
Słowa kluczowe
© 2020 Öznur Akgiş İlhan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Public License.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Factors affecting the choice of Teraklı as a preferred tourist destination_
| Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional architecture | 134 | 74 |
| Desire to be within natural life | 80 | 44 |
| Cultural attractions | 69 | 38 |
| Proximity to residence | 47 | 26 |
| A slow city | 45 | 25 |
| Local food products | 40 | 22 |
| Popular destination | 25 | 14 |
| Easy access | 23 | 13 |
| Other | 21 | 12 |
| Affordable rates of accommodation, transport, food & beverage etc. | 14 | 8 |