‘Cittaslow’: An Alternative Model for Local Sustainable Development or Just a Myth? Empirical Evidence in the Case of Tarakli (Turkey)
Öznur Akgiş İlhan
Department of Geography, Ahi Evran UniversityKırşehir, Turkey
Perfil de OrcidBuscar este autor en
, Erdal Karakaş
Department of Geography, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali UniversityBilecik, Turkey
Perfil de OrcidBuscar este autor en
y Büşra Özkaraman
Department of Geography, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali UniversityBilecik, Turkey
Perfil de OrcidBuscar este autor en
18 dic 2020
Acerca de este artículo
Publicado en línea: 18 dic 2020
Páginas: 23 - 37
Recibido: 10 ene 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2020-0029
Palabras clave
© 2020 Öznur Akgiş İlhan et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Public License.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Factors affecting the choice of Teraklı as a preferred tourist destination_
| Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional architecture | 134 | 74 |
| Desire to be within natural life | 80 | 44 |
| Cultural attractions | 69 | 38 |
| Proximity to residence | 47 | 26 |
| A slow city | 45 | 25 |
| Local food products | 40 | 22 |
| Popular destination | 25 | 14 |
| Easy access | 23 | 13 |
| Other | 21 | 12 |
| Affordable rates of accommodation, transport, food & beverage etc. | 14 | 8 |