The Prediction of Hull Gesture and Flow Around Ship Based on Taylor Expansion Boundary Element Method

1. Chen J.K., Duan W.Y., Zhao B.B., Ma Q.W. : Time domain hybrid TEBEM for 3D hydrodynamics of ship with large flare at forward speed. The 32nd International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Dalian, China,, 2017, pp. 23-26.Search in Google Scholar

2. Dai, Y. : Potential flow theory of ship motions in waves. National Defense Industry Publication, Beijing, , 2008. 11-33.Search in Google Scholar

3. Dawson C.W.: A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, pp. 30-38.Search in Google Scholar

4. Doctors L.J., 2006. A numerical study of the resistance of transom-stern monohulls. In: Fifth International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles, 1977, pp. 1-14.Search in Google Scholar

5. Doctors L.J., Macfarlane G.J., Young R. : A study of transom-stern ventilation. In: International Shipbuilding Progress, 54, 2007, pp. 145-163.Search in Google Scholar

6. Duan W.Y. : Taylor expansion boundary element method for floating body hydrodynamics. In: 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, 2012. Copenhagen, Danmark.Search in Google Scholar

7. Duan W.Y., Chen, J.K., Zhao, B.B. : Second-order Taylor expansion boundary element method for the second-order wave radiation problem. Applied Ocean Research, 52, 2015, pp. 12-26.10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.011Search in Google Scholar

8. IHI, SRI, U. of Tokyo and Yokohama N.U. : Cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic models in Japan, 1983.Search in Google Scholar

9. Guha A., Falzaranoa J. : Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm in ship hull optimization. Ocean System Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2015), pp. 91-107.Search in Google Scholar

10. Larsson L., Stern F., Visonneau M.: A workshop on numerical ship hydrodynamics. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

11. Lu Y., Chang X., Hu A.K.: A hydrodynamic optimization design methodology for a ship bulbous bow under multiple operating conditions. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 10, 2016, No. 1, pp. 330–345.10.1080/19942060.2016.1159987Search in Google Scholar

12. Minchev A., Schmidt M., Schnack S. : Contemporary bulk carrier design to meet IMO EEDI requirements. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Launceston, Tasmania, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

13. Nakos, D. E.: Ship wave patterns and motions by a three dimensional Rankine panel method. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

14. Peng H., Ni S., Qiu W.: Wave pattern and resistance prediction for ships of full form. Ocean Engineering, 87, 2014, pp. 162-173.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar

15. Raven H.C. :. Nonlinear ship wave calculations using the rapid method. In: Sixth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Iowa City, 1994Search in Google Scholar

16. Raven H.C.: A solution method for the nonlinear ship wave resistance problem. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor., Delft University of Technology, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

17. Sherbaz S.: Ship Trim Optimization for Reducing Resistance by CFD Simulations. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor, Harbin Engineering University, 2014.10.1155/2014/603695Search in Google Scholar

18. Sun J.L., Tu H.W., Chen Y.N., Xie D., Zhou J.J.: A study on trim optimization for a container ship based on effects due to resistance. Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 60, 2016, No. 1, pp. 30–4710.5957/JOSR.60.1.150022Search in Google Scholar

19. Tarafder M.S., Alia M.T., Nizamb M.S. : Numerical prediction of wave-making resistance of pentamaran in unbounded water using a surface panel method. Procedia Engineering, 56, 2013, pp. 287-296.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.120Search in Google Scholar

20. Takeshi H., Hino T., Hinatsu M., Tsukada Y., Fujisawa J.: ITTC Cooperative Experiments on a Series 60 Model at Ship Research Institute-Flow Measurements and Resistance Test, 1987Search in Google Scholar

21. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K. : Numerical calculation of free-surface potential flow around a ship using the modified Rankine source panel method. Ocean Engineering, 35, 2008, pp. 536-544.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.11.004Search in Google Scholar

22. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K.: Wave-making resistance of a catamaran hull in shallow water using a potential-based panel method. Journal of Ship Research, 52(1), 2008, pp. 16-29.10.5957/jsr.2008.52.1.16Search in Google Scholar

23. Toda Y., Stern F., Longo J. : Mean-flow measurements in the boundary layer and wake and wave field of a Series 60 CB=0.6 ship model for Froude Numbers 0.16 and 0.316. IIHR Report, No. 352, 1991.10.5957/jsr.1992.36.4.360Search in Google Scholar

24. Zhang B.J. The optimization of the hull form with the minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Journal of hydrodynamics, 21(2), 2009, pp. 277-284.10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60146-8Search in Google Scholar

25. Zhang B.J., Miao A.: The design of a hull form with the minimum total resistance. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(5), 2015, pp. 591-597Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhang B.J., Miao A. : Research on design method of the full form ship with minimum thrust deduction factor, China Ocean Eng., 29(2), 2015, pp. 301-31010.1007/s13344-015-0021-3Search in Google Scholar