[1. Chen J.K., Duan W.Y., Zhao B.B., Ma Q.W. : Time domain hybrid TEBEM for 3D hydrodynamics of ship with large flare at forward speed. The 32nd International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Dalian, China,, 2017, pp. 23-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Dai, Y. : Potential flow theory of ship motions in waves. National Defense Industry Publication, Beijing, , 2008. 11-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Dawson C.W.: A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In: Proceedings of Second International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, pp. 30-38.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Doctors L.J., 2006. A numerical study of the resistance of transom-stern monohulls. In: Fifth International Conference on High-Performance Marine Vehicles, 1977, pp. 1-14.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Doctors L.J., Macfarlane G.J., Young R. : A study of transom-stern ventilation. In: International Shipbuilding Progress, 54, 2007, pp. 145-163.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Duan W.Y. : Taylor expansion boundary element method for floating body hydrodynamics. In: 27th International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, 2012. Copenhagen, Danmark.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Duan W.Y., Chen, J.K., Zhao, B.B. : Second-order Taylor expansion boundary element method for the second-order wave radiation problem. Applied Ocean Research, 52, 2015, pp. 12-26.10.1016/j.apor.2015.04.011]Search in Google Scholar
[8. IHI, SRI, U. of Tokyo and Yokohama N.U. : Cooperative experiments on Wigley parabolic models in Japan, 1983.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Guha A., Falzaranoa J. : Application of multi-objective genetic algorithm in ship hull optimization. Ocean System Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2015), pp. 91-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Larsson L., Stern F., Visonneau M.: A workshop on numerical ship hydrodynamics. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Lu Y., Chang X., Hu A.K.: A hydrodynamic optimization design methodology for a ship bulbous bow under multiple operating conditions. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 10, 2016, No. 1, pp. 330–345.10.1080/19942060.2016.1159987]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Minchev A., Schmidt M., Schnack S. : Contemporary bulk carrier design to meet IMO EEDI requirements. Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, Launceston, Tasmania, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Nakos, D. E.: Ship wave patterns and motions by a three dimensional Rankine panel method. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Peng H., Ni S., Qiu W.: Wave pattern and resistance prediction for ships of full form. Ocean Engineering, 87, 2014, pp. 162-173.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Raven H.C. :. Nonlinear ship wave calculations using the rapid method. In: Sixth International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Iowa City, 1994]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Raven H.C.: A solution method for the nonlinear ship wave resistance problem. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor., Delft University of Technology, 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Sherbaz S.: Ship Trim Optimization for Reducing Resistance by CFD Simulations. A Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor, Harbin Engineering University, 2014.10.1155/2014/603695]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Sun J.L., Tu H.W., Chen Y.N., Xie D., Zhou J.J.: A study on trim optimization for a container ship based on effects due to resistance. Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 60, 2016, No. 1, pp. 30–4710.5957/JOSR.60.1.150022]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Tarafder M.S., Alia M.T., Nizamb M.S. : Numerical prediction of wave-making resistance of pentamaran in unbounded water using a surface panel method. Procedia Engineering, 56, 2013, pp. 287-296.10.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.120]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Takeshi H., Hino T., Hinatsu M., Tsukada Y., Fujisawa J.: ITTC Cooperative Experiments on a Series 60 Model at Ship Research Institute-Flow Measurements and Resistance Test, 1987]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K. : Numerical calculation of free-surface potential flow around a ship using the modified Rankine source panel method. Ocean Engineering, 35, 2008, pp. 536-544.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Tarafder M.S., Suzuki K.: Wave-making resistance of a catamaran hull in shallow water using a potential-based panel method. Journal of Ship Research, 52(1), 2008, pp. 16-29.10.5957/jsr.2008.52.1.16]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Toda Y., Stern F., Longo J. : Mean-flow measurements in the boundary layer and wake and wave field of a Series 60 CB=0.6 ship model for Froude Numbers 0.16 and 0.316. IIHR Report, No. 352, 1991.10.5957/jsr.1992.36.4.360]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Zhang B.J. The optimization of the hull form with the minimum wave making resistance based on Rankine source method. Journal of hydrodynamics, 21(2), 2009, pp. 277-284.10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60146-8]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Zhang B.J., Miao A.: The design of a hull form with the minimum total resistance. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(5), 2015, pp. 591-597]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Zhang B.J., Miao A. : Research on design method of the full form ship with minimum thrust deduction factor, China Ocean Eng., 29(2), 2015, pp. 301-31010.1007/s13344-015-0021-3]Search in Google Scholar