[
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, R.D. (2011). Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(2), 233–250. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01029.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnett, R., & Coate, K. (2010). Engaging the curriculum in higher education. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Basit, T., Eardley, A., Borup, R., Shah, H., Slack, K., & Hughes, A. (2015). Higher education institutions and work-based learning in the UK: employer engagement within a tripartite relationship. Higher Education, 70(6), 1003–1015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blackmur, D. (2015). Arguing with Stephanie Allais. Are national qualifications frameworks instruments of neoliberalism and social constructivism? Quality in Higher Education, 21(2), 213–228.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaschke, L.M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: a review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. International Review of Research in Open Distance Learning, 13, 56–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, H.S. (1970). Field work evidence. In H. Becker, Sociological work: Method and substance (pp. 39–62). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
British Educational Research Association (BERA) (2018). Ethical guidelines for educational research. Available on: https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-2018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blunkett, D. (2000). Modernising higher education. London: Maritime Greenwich University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of reflection to empower learners in higher education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. DOI:10.1080/14623940903500069.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chacko, T. (2018). Emerging pedagogies for effective adult learning: From andragogy to heutagogy. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences, 6(2), 278–284.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coghlan, D., & Holian, R. (2007). Editorial: insider action research. Action Research, 5, 5–10.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.) Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J.W., & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J.W., & Plano-Clark, V.L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed-method research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Department for Education and Skills (2004). Foundation degree task force report to ministers. London: DfES.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Drake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: a cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research & Methods in Education, 33(1), 85–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development. Cultural historical concepts in play. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: Archaeology of the human sciences. London: Pantheon Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrison, D.R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: a framework for research and practice. London: Routledge/Farmer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7, 95–105.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gosling, A. (2016). Quality early years environments. In Slaughter, E. (Ed.), Quality in the early years. London: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gray, D. (2018). Doing research in the real world (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halsall, J.P., Powell, J.M., & Snowden, M. (2016). Determined learning approach: Implications of heutagogy society based learning. Cogent Social Sciences, 2, (online). Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1223904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2000). From andragogy to heutagogy. Ultibase retrieved from: https://webarchive.nla.gov.au/awa/20010220130000/http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/dec00/hase2.htm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (2007). Heutagogy: a child of complexity theory. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Higher Education Institution (2019). Early Years Foundation Degree Programme Handbook. Institution documentation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knowles, M.S. (1970). The modern practice of adult education: Andragogy versus pedagogy. Chicago: Association Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knowles, M.S. (1984). Andragogy in action. Applying modern principles of adult learning. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maxwell, J.A. (2010). Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 475–482.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McAuliffe, M., Hargreaves, D., Winter, A., & Chadwick, G. (2008). Does pedagogy still rule? In Proceedings of the 2008 AAEE Conference, December 7–10, 2008, Yeppoon, Queensland. Retrieved from: http://www.engineersmedia.com.au/journals/aaee/pdf/AJEE_15_1M-cAuliffe%20F2.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McNiff, J. (2010). Action research for professional development. Poole: September Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milligan, L. (2016). Insider-outsider-inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 235–250, DOI:10.1080/03057925.2014.928510
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newson, J., & Newson, E. (1975). Intersubjectivity and the transmission of culture: on the social origins of symbolic functioning. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 437–446.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicholls, G. (2005). New lecturers’ constructions of learning, teaching and research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 30(5), 611–625.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. (2000). SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 1(33), 5–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oi-Ngor Cheung, S. (2015). Pedagogical practice wisdom in social work practice teaching – a kaleidoscopic view. Social Work Education, 34(3), 258–274, DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2014.1000293
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oppenheim, A.N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. New York: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pyrko, I., Dorfler, V., & Eden, C. (2019). Communities of practice in landscapes of practice. Management Learning, 50(4), 482–499. DOI: 10.1177/1350507619860854
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2015). The UK quality code for higher education. Available from: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/assuring-standards-and-quality/the-quality-code
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robinson, O.C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), pp. 25–41. DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Robson, C., & McCartyan, K. (2016). Real world research (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simon, A., Owen. C. Hollingworth, K., & Rutter, J. (2015). Provision and use of pre-school child-care in Britain. London: IOE Thomas Coram Research Unit.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teusner, A. (2016) Insider research, validity issues, and the OHS professional: one person’s journey. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(1), 85–96. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2015.1019263
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNESCO (2011). International standard classification of education. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-isced-2011-en.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Usher, R. (2002). Textuality and reflexivity in educational research. In D. Scott & R. Usher, (Eds.), Understanding Educational Research, (pp. 33–51), (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, V., & King. K. (2006). Understanding Mezirow’s theory of reflectivity from Confucian perspectives: a model and perspective. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1), 1–8.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wenger-Trayner, E., Fenton-O’Creevy, M., Hutchison, S., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (Eds.). (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R. (2018). Case study research and applications: design and methods (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar