1. bookTom 26 (2022): Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2083-8506
Pierwsze wydanie
01 Jan 1997
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski
Otwarty dostęp

Understanding polarization: A case study of Black Pete in the Netherlands

Data publikacji: 21 Oct 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 26 (2022) - Zeszyt 1 (January 2022)
Zakres stron: 399 - 414
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2083-8506
Pierwsze wydanie
01 Jan 1997
Częstotliwość wydawania
1 raz w roku
Języki
Angielski

Araujo, T., & Neijens, P. (2020). Unobtrusive measures for media research. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1–7. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0049 Search in Google Scholar

Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F. & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115 Search in Google Scholar

Brandsma, B. (2016). Polarisatie; inzicht in de dynamiek van wij-zij denken. [Polarization: Insight in us-we thinking]. Schoonrewoerd: BB in Media. Search in Google Scholar

Bruns, A. (2019). It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’metaphors have failed us. International Association for Media and Communication Research. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/131675/ Search in Google Scholar

De Dreu, C. (2009). Het nut van polarisatie in politiek en samenleving: een sociaal-psychologische verkenning [The utility of polarization in politics and society: a socio-psychological exploration]. In Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling (Ed.), Polarisatie: Bedreigend en verrijkend [Polarization: threatening and enriching] (pp. 140–152). Search in Google Scholar

Domke, D., Shah, D.V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. Communications Abstracts, 21(6), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.1.51 Search in Google Scholar

Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, J. W., & McNeal, R. S. (2016). Social media, participation, and attitudes: Does social media drive polarization? In T. Deželan & I. Vobič (Eds.), (R) evolutionizing political communication through social media (pp. 1–21). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch001 Search in Google Scholar

King, A. A., & Anderson, F. D. (1971). Nixon, Agnew, and the “silent majority”: A case study in the rhetoric of polarization. Western Speech, 35(4), 243–255.10.1080/10570317109373712 Search in Google Scholar

Lendering, J. (2008). Saint Nicholas, Sinterklaas, Santa Claus. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110513114942/ https://www.livius.org/ne-nn/nicholas/nicholas_of_myra3.html#New Search in Google Scholar

Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098 Search in Google Scholar

Masip, P., Suau, J., & Ruiz-Caballero, C. (2020). Incidental exposure to non-like-minded news through social media: Opposing voices in echo-chambers’ news feeds. Media and Communication, 8(4), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3146 Search in Google Scholar

McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58-67.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x Search in Google Scholar

Ministry of General Affairs (2018). Moet dat nou zo?! Communicatie in tijden van onbehagen [Does it have to be like this?! Communication in times of unease.]. Ministry of General Affairs. https://www.communicatierijk.nl/documenten/publicaties/2019/02/28/moet-dat-nou-zo. Search in Google Scholar

Ratheiser-van der Velde, M. J. (2018). Crossing ideological borders: How to contribute to depolarization within society and on a global level? World of Media Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.1.2018.3 Search in Google Scholar

Rodenberg, J., & Wagenaar, P. (2016). Essentializing Black Pete: Competing narratives surrounding the Sinterklaas tradition in the Netherlands. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(9), 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1193039 Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press. Search in Google Scholar

Söderberg, B. (2017). Inside the echo chamber: A qualitative study on anti-immigration internet media, political polarization and social trust in a fragmented digital landscape [Master thesis, Södertörns Högskola]. Search in Google Scholar

Suler, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184–188.10.1002/aps.42 Search in Google Scholar

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole. Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_2 Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods third edition. Applied social research methods series, 5. Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo