[
Araujo, T., & Neijens, P. (2020). Unobtrusive measures for media research. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, 1–7. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F. & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandsma, B. (2016). Polarisatie; inzicht in de dynamiek van wij-zij denken. [Polarization: Insight in us-we thinking]. Schoonrewoerd: BB in Media.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruns, A. (2019). It’s not the technology, stupid: How the ‘Echo Chamber’ and ‘Filter Bubble’metaphors have failed us. International Association for Media and Communication Research. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/131675/
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Dreu, C. (2009). Het nut van polarisatie in politiek en samenleving: een sociaal-psychologische verkenning [The utility of polarization in politics and society: a socio-psychological exploration]. In Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling (Ed.), Polarisatie: Bedreigend en verrijkend [Polarization: threatening and enriching] (pp. 140–152).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Domke, D., Shah, D.V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. Communications Abstracts, 21(6), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/10.1.51
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiorina, M. P., Abrams, S. J., & Pope, J. C. (2010). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holmes, J. W., & McNeal, R. S. (2016). Social media, participation, and attitudes: Does social media drive polarization? In T. Deželan & I. Vobič (Eds.), (R) evolutionizing political communication through social media (pp. 1–21). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-9879-6.ch001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, A. A., & Anderson, F. D. (1971). Nixon, Agnew, and the “silent majority”: A case study in the rhetoric of polarization. Western Speech, 35(4), 243–255.10.1080/10570317109373712
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lendering, J. (2008). Saint Nicholas, Sinterklaas, Santa Claus. Retrieved from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110513114942/ https://www.livius.org/ne-nn/nicholas/nicholas_of_myra3.html#New
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masip, P., Suau, J., & Ruiz-Caballero, C. (2020). Incidental exposure to non-like-minded news through social media: Opposing voices in echo-chambers’ news feeds. Media and Communication, 8(4), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3146
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993). The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 58-67.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of General Affairs (2018). Moet dat nou zo?! Communicatie in tijden van onbehagen [Does it have to be like this?! Communication in times of unease.]. Ministry of General Affairs. https://www.communicatierijk.nl/documenten/publicaties/2019/02/28/moet-dat-nou-zo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ratheiser-van der Velde, M. J. (2018). Crossing ideological borders: How to contribute to depolarization within society and on a global level? World of Media Journal of Russian Media and Journalism Studies, 1, 35–48. https://doi.org/10.30547/worldofmedia.1.2018.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodenberg, J., & Wagenaar, P. (2016). Essentializing Black Pete: Competing narratives surrounding the Sinterklaas tradition in the Netherlands. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 22(9), 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2016.1193039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Söderberg, B. (2017). Inside the echo chamber: A qualitative study on anti-immigration internet media, political polarization and social trust in a fragmented digital landscape [Master thesis, Södertörns Högskola].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suler, J. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2(2), 184–188.10.1002/aps.42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods third edition. Applied social research methods series, 5. Sage Publications
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, A. E., Parker, V. A., & Feinberg, M. (2020). Polarization in the contemporary political and media landscape. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.005
]Search in Google Scholar
