[1. Mozaffari, H.R., Izadi, B., Sadeghi, M., Rezaei, F., Sharifi, R. & Jalilian, F. (2016). Prevalence of oral and pharyngeal cancers in Kermanshah province, Iran: A ten-year period. Int. J. Cancer. Res. 12(3–4),169–175. DOI: 10.3923/ijcr.2016.169.175.10.3923/ijcr.2016.169.175]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Mozaffari, H.R., Payandeh, M., Ramezani, M., Sadeghi, M., Mahmoudiahmadabadi, M. & Sharifi, R. (2017). Efficacy of palifermin on oral mucositis and acute GVHD after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in hematology malignancy patients: a meta-analysis of trials. Współczesna. Onkol. 21(4), 299–305. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2017.72400.10.5114/wo.2017.72400]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Benson, J.R. & Jatoi, I. (2012). The global breast cancer burden. Future. Oncol. 8(6), 697–702. DOI: 10.2217/fon.12.61.10.2217/fon.12.61]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Mozaffari, H R., Zavattaro, E., Abdolahnejad, A., Lopez-Jornet, P., Omidpanah, N., Sharifi, R., Sadeghi, M., Shooriabi, M. & Safaei, M. (2018). Serum and Salivary IgA, IgG, and IgM Levels in Oral Lichen Planus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Medicina. 54(6), 99. DOI: 10.3390/medicina54060099.10.3390/medicina54060099]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Mozaffari, H.R., Sharifi, R. & Sadeghi, M. (2018). Interleukin-6 levels in the serum and saliva of patients with oral lichen planus compared with healthy controls: a meta-analysis study. Centr. Eur. J. Immunol. 43(1), 103–108. DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2018.74880.10.5114/ceji.2018.74880]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Veehof, M.M., Oskam, M.J., Schreurs, K.M. & Bohlmeijer, E.T. (2011). Acceptance-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. 152(3), 533–542. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.002.10.1016/j.pain.2010.11.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Sharifi, R., Khazaei, S., Mozaffari, H.R., Amiri, S.M., Iranmanesh, P. & Mousavi, S.A. (2017). Effect of massage on the success of anesthesia and infiltration injection pain in maxillary central incisors: Double-blind, crossover trial. Dent. Hypotheses. 8(3), 61–64. DOI: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_52_1610.4103/denthyp.denthyp_52_16]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Taran, M., Etemadi, S. & Safaei, M. (2017). Microbial levan biopolymer production and its use for the synthesis of an antibacterial iron (II, III) oxide–levan nanocomposite. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 134, 44613. DOI: 10.1002/app.44613.10.1002/app.44613]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Laxminarayan, R., Matsoso, P., Pant, S., Brower, C., Rottingen, J.A., Klugman, K. & Davies, S. (2016). Access to effective antimicrobials: a worldwide challenge. Lancet. 387(10014), 168–175. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00474-2.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00474-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Mead, P. S., Slutsker, L., Dietz, V., McCaig, L.F., Bresee, J.S., Shapiro, C., Griffin, P.M. & Tauxe, R.V. (1999). Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5(5), 607. DOI: 10.3201/eid0505.990502.10.3201/eid0505.990502262771410511517]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Elnashaie, S.S., Danafar, F. & Rafsanjani, H.H. (2015). Nanotechnology for chemical engineers. Springer, p. 273. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-496-2.10.1007/978-981-287-496-2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Zhang, L., Jiang, Y., Ding, Y., Povey, M. & York, D. (2007). Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 9(3), 479–489. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-006-9150-1.10.1007/s11051-006-9150-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Pachla, A., Lendzion-Bielun, Z., Moszynski, D., Markowska-Szczupak, A., Narkiewicz, U., Wrobel, R.J., Guskos, N. & Zołnierkiewicz, G. (2016). Synthesis and antibacterial properties of Fe3O4-Ag nanostructures. Pol. J. Chem. Tech. 18(4), 110–116. DOI: 10.1515/pjct-2016-0079.10.1515/pjct-2016-0079]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[14. Dizaj, S.M., Lotfipour, F., Barzegar-Jalali, M., Zarrintan, M.H. & Adibkia, K. (2014). Antimicrobial activity of the metals and metal oxide nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 44, 278–284. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.031.10.1016/j.msec.2014.08.03125280707]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Hezaveh, H. & Muhamad, I.I. (2012). Impact of metal oxide nanoparticles in oral release properties of pH-sensitive hydrogel nanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromolec. 50, 1334–1340. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.03.017.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.03.01722484730]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Hotze, E.M., Phenrat, T. & Lowry, G. V. (2010). Nanoparticle Aggregation: Challenges to Understanding Transport and Reactivity in the Environment All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. J. Environ. Qual. 39(6), 1909–1924.10.2134/jeq2009.0462]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Safaei, M. & Taran, M. (2017). Fabrication, characterization, and antifungal activity of sodium hyaluronate-TiO2 bionanocomposite against Aspergillus niger. Materials Letters, 207, 113–116. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.038.10.1016/j.matlet.2017.07.038]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[18. Safaei, M., Taran, M. & Imani M.M. (2019). Preparation, structural characterization, thermal properties and antifungal activity of alginate-CuO bionanocomposite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 101, 323–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.108.10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.10831029325]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[19. Klemm, D., Heublein, B., Fink, H.P. & Bohn, A. (2005). Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. A. Chem. Int. Ed. 44(22), 3358–3393. DOI: 10.1002/anie.20046058710.1002/anie.20046058715861454]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[20. Fryczkowska, B. & Wiechniak, K. (2017). Preparation and properties of cellulose membranes with graphene oxide addition. Pol. J. Chem. Tech. 19(4), 41–49. DOI: 10.1515/pjct-2017-0066.10.1515/pjct-2017-0066]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Hu, W., Chen, S., Yang, J., Li, Z. & Wang, H. (2014). Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydr. Polym. 101, 1043–1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.102.10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.09.10224299873]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Petersen, N. & Gatenholm, P. (2011). Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91(5), 1277. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y.10.1007/s00253-011-3432-y21744133]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Shao, W., Liu, H., Liu, X., Sun, H., Wang, S. & Zhang, R. (2015). pH-responsive release behavior and anti-bacterial activity of bacterial cellulose-silver nanocomposites. Int. J. Biol. Macromolec. 76, 209–217. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.048.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.02.04825748842]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Li, B., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Qiu, W., Wang, X., Liu, B., Wang, Y. & Sun, G. (2016). Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial activity of chitosan/TiO2 nanocomposite against Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. Carbohydr. Polym. 152, 825–831. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.07010.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.07027516334]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Nguyen, V.T., Flanagan, B., Gidley, M.J. & Dykes, G.A. (2008). Characterization of cellulose production by a Gluconacetobacter xylinus strain from Kombucha. Curr. Microbiol. 57, 449–453. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-008-9228-310.1007/s00284-008-9228-318704575]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Pathania, D., Kumari, M. & Gupta, V.K. (2015) Fabrication of ZnS–cellulose nanocomposite for drug delivery, antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. Mater. Des. 87, 1056–1064. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.10310.1016/j.matdes.2015.08.103]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[27. Safaei, M. & Taran, M. (2017). Optimal conditions for producing bactericidal sodium hyaluronate-TiO2 bionanocomposite and its characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromolec. 104, 449–456. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.016.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.01628619641]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[28. Muhamad, I.I., Asgharzadehahmadi, S.A., Zaidel, D.N. A. & Supriyanto E. (2013). Characterisation and Evaluation of Antibacterial Properties of Polyacrylamide Based Hydrogel Containing Magnesium Oxide Nanoparticles. Int. J. Biol. Biomed. Eng. 7(3), 108–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Jin, T. & He, Y. (2011). Antibacterial activities of magnesium oxide (MgO) nanoparticles against foodborne pathogens. J. Nanopart. Res. 13(12), 6877–6885. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-011-0595-5.10.1007/s11051-011-0595-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[30. Leung, Y.H., Ng, A., Xu, X., Shen, Z., Gethings, L.A., Wong, M.T., Chan, C., Guo, M.Y., Ng, Y.H., Djurisic, A.B. & Lee, P.K. (2014). Mechanisms of antibacterial activity of MgO: non-ROS mediated toxicity of MgO nanoparticles towards Escherichia coli. Small, 10(6), 1171–1183. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201302434.10.1002/smll.20130243424344000]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[31. Tang, Z.X. & Lv, B.F. (2014). MgO nanoparticles as antibacterial agent: preparation and activity. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 31(3), 591–601. DOI: 10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002813.10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002813]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Yadollahi, M., Gholamali, I., Namazi, H. & Aghazadeh, M. (2015). Synthesis and characterization of antibacterial carboxymethyl cellulose/ZnO nanocomposite hydrogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromolec. 74, 136–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.032.10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.11.03225524743]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Zajac, A., Hanuza, J., Wandas, M. & Dyminska, L. (2015). Determination of N-acetylation degree in chitosan using Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta A. 134, 114–120. DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.06.071.10.1016/j.saa.2014.06.07125011040]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[34. Sharma, R.K. (2012). A study in thermal properties of graft copolymers of cellulose and methacrylates. Adv. Appl. Sci. Res. 3(6), 3961–3969.]Search in Google Scholar