Exploring the Meaning Problem of Big and Small Data Through Digital Method Triangulation

Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired, 23 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/ [accessed 2019, February 4]. AndersonC. 2008 The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete Wired 23 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/ [accessed 2019, February 4] Search in Google Scholar

Araujo, T., Wonneberger, A., Neijens, P. & de Vreese, C. (2017). How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of internet use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3): 173–190. AraujoT. WonnebergerA. NeijensP. de VreeseC. 2017 How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of internet use Communication Methods and Measures 11 3 173 190 10.1080/19312458.2017.1317337 Search in Google Scholar

Arthur, P. L. & Bode, K. (2014). Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ArthurP. L. BodeK. 2014 Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theories London Palgrave Macmillan 10.1057/9781137337016 Search in Google Scholar

Bailenson, J. N. (2012). Doppelgangers: A new form of self. The Psychologist, 25(1): 36–39. BailensonJ. N. 2012 Doppelgangers: A new form of self The Psychologist 25 1 36 39 Search in Google Scholar

Barbour, R. & Kitzinger, J. (eds.) (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice. London: Sage. BarbourR. KitzingerJ. (eds.) 1999 Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice London Sage 10.4135/9781849208857 Search in Google Scholar

Berry, D. (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. BerryD. 2012 Understanding digital humanities Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan 10.1057/9780230371934 Search in Google Scholar

Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662–679. BoydD. CrawfordK. 2012 Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon Information, Communication & Society 15 5 662 679 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 Search in Google Scholar

Carey, M. A. & Asbury, J.-E. (2012). Focus group research. New York: Routledge. CareyM. A. AsburyJ.-E. 2012 Focus group research New York Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine. DenzinN. K. 1970 The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods Chicago Aldine Search in Google Scholar

Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16: 419–427. DenzinN. K. 2010 Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs Qualitative Inquiry 16 419 427 10.1177/1077800410364608 Search in Google Scholar

Dienlin, T. & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3): 285–297. DienlinT. TrepteS. 2015 Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors European Journal of Social Psychology 45 3 285 297 10.1002/ejsp.2049 Search in Google Scholar

Dourish, P. & Button, G. (1998). On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human–Computer Interaction, 13(4): 395–432. DourishP. ButtonG. 1998 On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design Human–Computer Interaction 13 4 395 432 10.1207/s15327051hci1304_2 Search in Google Scholar

Fetters, M. D. & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1): 3–10. FettersM. D. Molina-AzorinJ. F. 2017 The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field Journal of Mixed Methods Research 11 1 3 10 10.1177/1558689816682092 Search in Google Scholar

Fetveit, A. (2000). Den trojanske hest: Om metodebegrepets marginalisering av humanistisk medieforskning [The Trojan Horse: About the method concepts marginalization of humanistic media research]. Norsk Medietidskrift, 2: 5–27. FetveitA. 2000 Den trojanske hest: Om metodebegrepets marginalisering av humanistisk medieforskning [The Trojan Horse: About the method concepts marginalization of humanistic media research] Norsk Medietidskrift 2 5 27 10.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2000-02-02 Search in Google Scholar

Findahl, O., Lagerstedt, C. & Aurelius, A. (2014). Triangulation as a way to validate and deepen the knowledge about user behavior: A comparison between questionnaires, diaries and traffic measurements. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jurisic (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 54–72). London: Routledge. FindahlO. LagerstedtC. AureliusA. 2014 Triangulation as a way to validate and deepen the knowledge about user behavior: A comparison between questionnaires, diaries and traffic measurements In PatriarcheG. BilandzicH. Linaa JensenJ. JurisicJ. (eds.) Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation 54 72 London Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage. FuchsC. 2017 Social media: A critical introduction London Sage Search in Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books. GeertzC. 1973 The interpretation of cultures New York, NY Basic Books Search in Google Scholar

Giglietto, F., Rossi, L. & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4): 145–159. GigliettoF. RossiL. BennatoD. 2012 The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as a research data source Journal of Technology in Human Services 30 3–4 145 159 10.4324/9781315091204-2 Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, B. S., Eastin, M. S., Skalski, P., Cooper, L., Levy, M. & Lachlan, K. (2005). Comparing survey and diary measures of internet and traditional media use. Communication Reports, 18(1): 1–8. GreenbergB. S. EastinM. S. SkalskiP. CooperL. LevyM. LachlanK. 2005 Comparing survey and diary measures of internet and traditional media use Communication Reports 18 1 1 8 10.1080/08934210500084164 Search in Google Scholar

Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(71): 71–89. HalkierB. 2010 Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data Qualitative Research 10 71 71 89 10.1177/1468794109348683 Search in Google Scholar

Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage Publications. HineC. 2000 Virtual ethnography London Sage Publications 10.4135/9780857020277 Search in Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. (2016). An introduction to digital media research methods: How to research and the implications of new media data. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1): 1–6. HutchinsonJ. 2016 An introduction to digital media research methods: How to research and the implications of new media data Communication Research and Practice 2 1 1 6 10.1080/22041451.2016.1155307 Search in Google Scholar

Iliadis, A. & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society [online 2017]. IliadisA. RussoF. 2016 Critical data studies: An introduction Big Data & Society [online 2017] 10.1177/2053951716674238 Search in Google Scholar

Jankowski, N. & Wester, F. (1991 [2002]). The qualitative tradition in social science inquiry: Contributions to mass communication research. In K. B. Jensen & N. Jankowski (eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 44–74). London: Routledge. JankowskiN. WesterF. 1991 [2002] The qualitative tradition in social science inquiry: Contributions to mass communication research In JensenK. B. JankowskiN. (eds.) A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research 44 74 London Routledge 10.4324/9780203409800-7 Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, K. B. (2012). Lost, found, and made: Qualitative data in the study of three-step flows of communication. In I. Volkmer (ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 435–450). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. JensenK. B. 2012 Lost, found, and made: Qualitative data in the study of three-step flows of communication In VolkmerI. (ed.) The handbook of global media research 435 450 Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell 10.1002/9781118255278.ch25 Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, K. B. (2014). Audiences, audiences, everywhere: Measured, interpreted and imagined. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jurisic (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 227–240). London: Routledge. JensenK. B. 2014 Audiences, audiences, everywhere: Measured, interpreted and imagined In PatriarcheG. BilandzicH. Linaa JensenJ. JurisicJ. (eds.) Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation 227 240 London Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602–611. JickT. 1979 Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action Administrative Science Quarterly 24 4 602 611 10.2307/2392366 Search in Google Scholar

Kåhre, P. (2009). På AI-teknikens axlar: om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens [On the shoulders of AI technology: about knowledge sociology and strong artificial intelligence]. Lund Dissertations in Sociology, 1102–4712; 87. Lund: Department of Sociology, Lund University. KåhreP. 2009 På AI-teknikens axlar: om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens [On the shoulders of AI technology: about knowledge sociology and strong artificial intelligence] Lund Dissertations in Sociology, 1102–4712; 87 Lund Department of Sociology, Lund University Search in Google Scholar

Kihl, M., Lagerstedt, C., Aurelius, A. & Ödling, P. (2010). Traffic analysis and characterization of Internet user behavior. Paper presented at the conference International congress on ultra-modern telecommunications and control systems and workshop (ICUMT), 2010, October 18–20, Moscow. KihlM. LagerstedtC. AureliusA. ÖdlingP. 2010 Traffic analysis and characterization of Internet user behavior Paper presented at the conference International congress on ultra-modern telecommunications and control systems and workshop (ICUMT) 2010, October 18–20 Moscow 10.1109/ICUMT.2010.5676633 Search in Google Scholar

Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 2014: 1–12. KitchinR. 2014 Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts Big Data & Society 2014 1 12 10.1177/2053951714528481 Search in Google Scholar

Kitchin, R. & Lauriault, T. (2014). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. The Programmable City Working Paper 2. Programmable City, Social Science Research Network. KitchinR. LauriaultT. 2014 Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work The Programmable City Working Paper 2 Programmable City, Social Science Research Network Search in Google Scholar

Kitchin, R. & Lauriault, T. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80: 463–475. KitchinR. LauriaultT. 2015 Small data in the era of big data GeoJournal 80 463 475 10.1007/s10708-014-9601-7 Search in Google Scholar

Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage. KruegerR. 1994 Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research London Sage Search in Google Scholar

Ladner, S. (2009). Watching the web: An ontological and epistemological critique of web-traffic measurement. In B. J. Jansen, A. Spink & I. Taksa (eds.), Handbook of research on web log analysis (pp. 504–520). New York, NY: Information Science Reference. LadnerS. 2009 Watching the web: An ontological and epistemological critique of web-traffic measurement In JansenB. J. SpinkA. TaksaI. (eds.) Handbook of research on web log analysis 504 520 New York, NY Information Science Reference 10.4018/978-1-59904-974-8.ch004 Search in Google Scholar

Lagerstedt, C., Findahl, O., Aurelius, A., Pathirana, H. & Popp Larsen, C. (2012). Understanding Internet user behavior: Towards a unified methodology. International Journal of Advances in Telecommunications, 5(3–4): 153–163. LagerstedtC. FindahlO. AureliusA. PathiranaH. Popp LarsenC. 2012 Understanding Internet user behavior: Towards a unified methodology International Journal of Advances in Telecommunications 5 3–4 153 163 Search in Google Scholar

Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Sage: London. LiamputtongP. 2011 Focus group methodology: Principles and practice Sage London 10.4135/9781473957657 Search in Google Scholar

Lijadi, A. & van Schalkwyk, G. (2015). Online Facebook focus group research of hard-to-reach participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5): 1–9. LijadiA. van SchalkwykG. 2015 Online Facebook focus group research of hard-to-reach participants International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14 5 1 9 10.1177/1609406915621383 Search in Google Scholar

Liu, A. (2013). The meaning of the digital humanities. PMLA, 128: 409–422. LiuA. 2013 The meaning of the digital humanities PMLA 128 409 422 10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409 Search in Google Scholar

Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology. London: Routledge. LuptonD. 2014 Digital sociology London Routledge 10.4324/9781315776880 Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A. & Grass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. MackeyA. GrassS. M. 2005 Second language research: Methodology and design London Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Search in Google Scholar

Mahrt, M. & Sharkow, M. (2013). The value of big data in digital media research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1): 20–33. MahrtM. SharkowM. 2013 The value of big data in digital media research Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 57 1 20 33 10.1080/08838151.2012.761700 Search in Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. Retrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/trending-the-promises-and-the-challenges-of-big-social-data [accessed 2019, February 4]. ManovichL. 2011 Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data Retrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/trending-the-promises-and-the-challenges-of-big-social-data [accessed 2019, February 4] Search in Google Scholar

Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. ManovichL. 2012 Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data In GoldM. K. (ed.) Debates in the digital humanities 460 475 Minneapolis, MN University of Minnesota Press 10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0047 Search in Google Scholar

Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Cambridge: Polity Press. MarresN. 2017 Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research Cambridge Polity Press Search in Google Scholar

Marwick, A. E. & Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7): 1051–1067. MarwickA. E. BoydD. 2014 Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media New Media & Society 16 7 1051 1067 10.1177/1461444814543995 Search in Google Scholar

Mehl, M. & Gill, A. (2010). Automatic text analysis. In S. Gosling & J. Johnson (eds.), Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research (pp. 109–127). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. MehlM. GillA. 2010 Automatic text analysis In GoslingS. JohnsonJ. (eds.) Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research 109 127 Washington, DC American Psychological Association 10.1037/12076-008 Search in Google Scholar

Menchen-Trevino, E. & Karr, C. (2012). Researching real-world web use with Roxy: Collecting observational web data with informed consent. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(3): 254–268. Menchen-TrevinoE. KarrC. 2012 Researching real-world web use with Roxy: Collecting observational web data with informed consent Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9 3 254 268 10.1080/19331681.2012.664966 Search in Google Scholar

Miller, S. & Gatta, J. (2006). The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40(4): 595–610. MillerS. GattaJ. 2006 The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects Quality & Quantity 40 4 595 610 10.1007/s11135-005-1099-0 Search in Google Scholar

Mills, K. (2017). What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research? Qualitative Research 18(6): 591–603. MillsK. 2017 What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research? Qualitative Research 18 6 591 603 10.1177/1468794117743465 Search in Google Scholar

Morley, D. & Silverstone, R. (2002 [1991]). Media audiences, communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience. In K. B. Jensen & N. Jankowski (eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 149–162). London: Routledge. MorleyD. SilverstoneR. 2002 [1991] Media audiences, communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience In JensenK. B. JankowskiN. (eds.) A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research 149 162 London Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J. & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 20–32. NyumbaT. O. WilsonK. DerrickC. J. MukherjeeN. 2018 The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9 20 32 10.1111/2041-210X.12860 Search in Google Scholar

Patriarche, G., Bilandzic, H., Linaa Jensen, J. & Jurisic, J. (eds.) (2014). Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation. London: Routledge. PatriarcheG. BilandzicH. Linaa JensenJ. JurisicJ. (eds.) 2014 Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation London Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. RogersR. 2013 Digital methods Cambridge, MA The MIT Press 10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001 Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, R. (2015). Digital methods for web research. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–22). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. RogersR. 2015 Digital methods for web research In ScottR. KosslynS. (eds.) Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences 1 22 Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0076 Search in Google Scholar

Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1): 13–27. ScharkowM. 2016 The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log data Communication Methods and Measures 10 1 13 27 10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446 Search in Google Scholar

Schrøder, K. C., Hasebrink, U., Hölig, S. & Barker, M. (2012). Introduction: Exploring the methodological synergies of multimethod audience research. Participation Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2): 643–647. SchrøderK. C. HasebrinkU. HöligS. BarkerM. 2012 Introduction: Exploring the methodological synergies of multimethod audience research Participation Journal of Audience and Reception Studies 9 2 643 647 Search in Google Scholar

Simon, J. & Ess, C. (2015). The ONLIFE initiative: A concept reengineering exercise. Philosophy and Technology, 28(1): 157–162. SimonJ. EssC. 2015 The ONLIFE initiative: A concept reengineering exercise Philosophy and Technology 28 1 157 162 10.1007/s13347-015-0189-8 Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. H., Dinev, T. & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4): 989–1015. SmithJ. H. DinevT. XuH. 2011 Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review MIS Quarterly 35 4 989 1015 10.2307/41409970 Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage. StewartD. W. ShamdasaniP. N. 2015 Focus groups: Theory and practice 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA Sage Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, K. & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5: 395–416. StewartK. WilliamsM. 2005 Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research Qualitative Research 5 395 416 10.1177/1468794105056916 Search in Google Scholar

Taksa, I., Spink, A. & Jansen, B. J. (2009). Web log analysis: Diversity of research methodologies. In B. J. Jansen, A. Spink & I. Taksa (eds.), Handbook of research on web log analysis (pp. 504––520). New York, NY: Information Science Reference. TaksaI. SpinkA. JansenB. J. 2009 Web log analysis: Diversity of research methodologies In JansenB. J. SpinkA. TaksaI. (eds.) Handbook of research on web log analysis 504 520 New York, NY Information Science Reference Search in Google Scholar

Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3): 253–258. ThurmondV. A. 2001 The point of triangulation Journal of Nursing Scholarship 33 3 253 258 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x Search in Google Scholar

Turney, L. & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2): 32–43. TurneyL. PockneeC. 2005 Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research International Journal of Qualitative Methods 4 2 32 43 10.1177/160940690500400203 Search in Google Scholar

Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2): 197–208. Van DijckJ. 2014 Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology Surveillance & Society 12 2 197 208 10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 Search in Google Scholar

Vicente-Mariño, M. (2014). Audience research methods: Facing the challenge of transforming audiences. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jelena (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 37–53). London: Routledge. Vicente-MariñoM. 2014 Audience research methods: Facing the challenge of transforming audiences In PatriarcheG. BilandzicH. Linaa JensenJ. JelenaJ. (eds.) Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation 37 53 London Routledge Search in Google Scholar

Williams, S., Giatsi Clausen, M., Robertson, A., Peacock, S. & McPherson, K. (2012). Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4): 368–383. WilliamsS. Giatsi ClausenM. RobertsonA. PeacockS. McPhersonK. 2012 Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research International Journal of Qualitative Methods 11 4 368 383 10.1177/160940691201100405 Search in Google Scholar