This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired, 23 [online]. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/ [accessed 2019, February 4].AndersonC.2008The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsoleteWired23[online]. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/ [accessed 2019, February 4]Search in Google Scholar
Araujo, T., Wonneberger, A., Neijens, P. & de Vreese, C. (2017). How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of internet use. Communication Methods and Measures, 11(3): 173–190.AraujoT.WonnebergerA.NeijensP.de VreeseC.2017How much time do you spend online? Understanding and improving the accuracy of self-reported measures of internet useCommunication Methods and Measures11317319010.1080/19312458.2017.1317337Search in Google Scholar
Arthur, P. L. & Bode, K. (2014). Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theories. London: Palgrave Macmillan.ArthurP. L.BodeK.2014Advancing digital humanities: Research, methods, theoriesLondonPalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9781137337016Search in Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. N. (2012). Doppelgangers: A new form of self. The Psychologist, 25(1): 36–39.BailensonJ. N.2012Doppelgangers: A new form of selfThe Psychologist2513639Search in Google Scholar
Barbour, R. & Kitzinger, J. (eds.) (1999). Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practice. London: Sage.BarbourR.KitzingerJ.(eds.)1999Developing focus group research: Politics, theory, and practiceLondonSage10.4135/9781849208857Search in Google Scholar
Berry, D. (2012). Understanding digital humanities. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.BerryD.2012Understanding digital humanitiesBasingstokePalgrave Macmillan10.1057/9780230371934Search in Google Scholar
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5): 662–679.BoydD.CrawfordK.2012Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenonInformation, Communication & Society15566267910.1080/1369118X.2012.678878Search in Google Scholar
Carey, M. A. & Asbury, J.-E. (2012). Focus group research. New York: Routledge.CareyM. A.AsburyJ.-E.2012Focus group researchNew YorkRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Chicago: Aldine.DenzinN. K.1970The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methodsChicagoAldineSearch in Google Scholar
Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16: 419–427.DenzinN. K.2010Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogsQualitative Inquiry1641942710.1177/1077800410364608Search in Google Scholar
Dienlin, T. & Trepte, S. (2015). Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3): 285–297.DienlinT.TrepteS.2015Is the privacy paradox a relic of the past? An in-depth analysis of privacy attitudes and privacy behaviorsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology45328529710.1002/ejsp.2049Search in Google Scholar
Dourish, P. & Button, G. (1998). On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system design. Human–Computer Interaction, 13(4): 395–432.DourishP.ButtonG.1998On “technomethodology”: Foundational relationships between ethnomethodology and system designHuman–Computer Interaction13439543210.1207/s15327051hci1304_2Search in Google Scholar
Fetters, M. D. & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2017). The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the field. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(1): 3–10.FettersM. D.Molina-AzorinJ. F.2017The Journal of Mixed Methods Research starts a new decade: Principles for bringing in the new and divesting of the old language of the fieldJournal of Mixed Methods Research11131010.1177/1558689816682092Search in Google Scholar
Fetveit, A. (2000). Den trojanske hest: Om metodebegrepets marginalisering av humanistisk medieforskning [The Trojan Horse: About the method concepts marginalization of humanistic media research]. Norsk Medietidskrift, 2: 5–27.FetveitA.2000Den trojanske hest: Om metodebegrepets marginalisering av humanistisk medieforskning[The Trojan Horse: About the method concepts marginalization of humanistic media research]Norsk Medietidskrift252710.18261/ISSN0805-9535-2000-02-02Search in Google Scholar
Findahl, O., Lagerstedt, C. & Aurelius, A. (2014). Triangulation as a way to validate and deepen the knowledge about user behavior: A comparison between questionnaires, diaries and traffic measurements. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jurisic (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 54–72). London: Routledge.FindahlO.LagerstedtC.AureliusA.2014Triangulation as a way to validate and deepen the knowledge about user behavior: A comparison between questionnaires, diaries and traffic measurementsInPatriarcheG.BilandzicH.Linaa JensenJ.JurisicJ.(eds.)Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation5472LondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage.FuchsC.2017Social media: A critical introductionLondonSageSearch in Google Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books.GeertzC.1973The interpretation of culturesNew York, NYBasic BooksSearch in Google Scholar
Giglietto, F., Rossi, L. & Bennato, D. (2012). The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4): 145–159.GigliettoF.RossiL.BennatoD.2012The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter and YouTube as a research data sourceJournal of Technology in Human Services303–414515910.4324/9781315091204-2Search in Google Scholar
Greenberg, B. S., Eastin, M. S., Skalski, P., Cooper, L., Levy, M. & Lachlan, K. (2005). Comparing survey and diary measures of internet and traditional media use. Communication Reports, 18(1): 1–8.GreenbergB. S.EastinM. S.SkalskiP.CooperL.LevyM.LachlanK.2005Comparing survey and diary measures of internet and traditional media useCommunication Reports1811810.1080/08934210500084164Search in Google Scholar
Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qualitative Research, 10(71): 71–89.HalkierB.2010Focus groups as social enactments: Integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group dataQualitative Research1071718910.1177/1468794109348683Search in Google Scholar
Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage Publications.HineC.2000Virtual ethnographyLondonSage Publications10.4135/9780857020277Search in Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. (2016). An introduction to digital media research methods: How to research and the implications of new media data. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1): 1–6.HutchinsonJ.2016An introduction to digital media research methods: How to research and the implications of new media dataCommunication Research and Practice211610.1080/22041451.2016.1155307Search in Google Scholar
Iliadis, A. & Russo, F. (2016). Critical data studies: An introduction. Big Data & Society [online 2017].IliadisA.RussoF.2016Critical data studies: An introductionBig Data & Society[online 2017]10.1177/2053951716674238Search in Google Scholar
Jankowski, N. & Wester, F. (1991 [2002]). The qualitative tradition in social science inquiry: Contributions to mass communication research. In K. B. Jensen & N. Jankowski (eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 44–74). London: Routledge.JankowskiN.WesterF.1991 [2002]The qualitative tradition in social science inquiry: Contributions to mass communication researchInJensenK. B.JankowskiN.(eds.)A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research4474LondonRoutledge10.4324/9780203409800-7Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (2012). Lost, found, and made: Qualitative data in the study of three-step flows of communication. In I. Volkmer (ed.), The handbook of global media research (pp. 435–450). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.JensenK. B.2012Lost, found, and made: Qualitative data in the study of three-step flows of communicationInVolkmerI.(ed.)The handbook of global media research435450Hoboken, NJWiley-Blackwell10.1002/9781118255278.ch25Search in Google Scholar
Jensen, K. B. (2014). Audiences, audiences, everywhere: Measured, interpreted and imagined. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jurisic (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 227–240). London: Routledge.JensenK. B.2014Audiences, audiences, everywhere: Measured, interpreted and imaginedInPatriarcheG.BilandzicH.Linaa JensenJ.JurisicJ.(eds.)Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation227240LondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4): 602–611.JickT.1979Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in actionAdministrative Science Quarterly24460261110.2307/2392366Search in Google Scholar
Kåhre, P. (2009). På AI-teknikens axlar: om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens [On the shoulders of AI technology: about knowledge sociology and strong artificial intelligence]. Lund Dissertations in Sociology, 1102–4712; 87. Lund: Department of Sociology, Lund University.KåhreP.2009På AI-teknikens axlar: om kunskapssociologin och stark artificiell intelligens[On the shoulders of AI technology: about knowledge sociology and strong artificial intelligence]Lund Dissertations in Sociology, 1102–4712; 87LundDepartment of Sociology, Lund UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Kihl, M., Lagerstedt, C., Aurelius, A. & Ödling, P. (2010). Traffic analysis and characterization of Internet user behavior. Paper presented at the conference International congress on ultra-modern telecommunications and control systems and workshop (ICUMT), 2010, October 18–20, Moscow.KihlM.LagerstedtC.AureliusA.ÖdlingP.2010Traffic analysis and characterization of Internet user behaviorPaper presented at the conference International congress on ultra-modern telecommunications and control systems and workshop (ICUMT)2010, October 18–20Moscow10.1109/ICUMT.2010.5676633Search in Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society 2014: 1–12.KitchinR.2014Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shiftsBig Data & Society201411210.1177/2053951714528481Search in Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. & Lauriault, T. (2014). Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. The Programmable City Working Paper 2. Programmable City, Social Science Research Network.KitchinR.LauriaultT.2014Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their workThe Programmable City Working Paper 2Programmable City, Social Science Research NetworkSearch in Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. & Lauriault, T. (2015). Small data in the era of big data. GeoJournal, 80: 463–475.KitchinR.LauriaultT.2015Small data in the era of big dataGeoJournal8046347510.1007/s10708-014-9601-7Search in Google Scholar
Krueger, R. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. London: Sage.KruegerR.1994Focus groups: A practical guide for applied researchLondonSageSearch in Google Scholar
Ladner, S. (2009). Watching the web: An ontological and epistemological critique of web-traffic measurement. In B. J. Jansen, A. Spink & I. Taksa (eds.), Handbook of research on web log analysis (pp. 504–520). New York, NY: Information Science Reference.LadnerS.2009Watching the web: An ontological and epistemological critique of web-traffic measurementInJansenB. J.SpinkA.TaksaI.(eds.)Handbook of research on web log analysis504520New York, NYInformation Science Reference10.4018/978-1-59904-974-8.ch004Search in Google Scholar
Lagerstedt, C., Findahl, O., Aurelius, A., Pathirana, H. & Popp Larsen, C. (2012). Understanding Internet user behavior: Towards a unified methodology. International Journal of Advances in Telecommunications, 5(3–4): 153–163.LagerstedtC.FindahlO.AureliusA.PathiranaH.Popp LarsenC.2012Understanding Internet user behavior: Towards a unified methodologyInternational Journal of Advances in Telecommunications53–4153163Search in Google Scholar
Liamputtong, P. (2011). Focus group methodology: Principles and practice. Sage: London.LiamputtongP.2011Focus group methodology: Principles and practiceSageLondon10.4135/9781473957657Search in Google Scholar
Lijadi, A. & van Schalkwyk, G. (2015). Online Facebook focus group research of hard-to-reach participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(5): 1–9.LijadiA.van SchalkwykG.2015Online Facebook focus group research of hard-to-reach participantsInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods1451910.1177/1609406915621383Search in Google Scholar
Liu, A. (2013). The meaning of the digital humanities. PMLA, 128: 409–422.LiuA.2013The meaning of the digital humanitiesPMLA12840942210.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409Search in Google Scholar
Lupton, D. (2014). Digital sociology. London: Routledge.LuptonD.2014Digital sociologyLondonRoutledge10.4324/9781315776880Search in Google Scholar
Mackey, A. & Grass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.MackeyA.GrassS. M.2005Second language research: Methodology and designLondonLawrence Erlbaum AssocSearch in Google Scholar
Mahrt, M. & Sharkow, M. (2013). The value of big data in digital media research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57(1): 20–33.MahrtM.SharkowM.2013The value of big data in digital media researchJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media571203310.1080/08838151.2012.761700Search in Google Scholar
Manovich, L. (2011). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. Retrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/trending-the-promises-and-the-challenges-of-big-social-data [accessed 2019, February 4].ManovichL.2011Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social dataRetrieved from http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/trending-the-promises-and-the-challenges-of-big-social-data [accessed 2019, February 4]Search in Google Scholar
Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social data. In M. K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 460–475). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.ManovichL.2012Trending: The promises and the challenges of big social dataInGoldM. K.(ed.)Debates in the digital humanities460475Minneapolis, MNUniversity of Minnesota Press10.5749/minnesota/9780816677948.003.0047Search in Google Scholar
Marres, N. (2017). Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Cambridge: Polity Press.MarresN.2017Digital sociology: The reinvention of social researchCambridgePolity PressSearch in Google Scholar
Marwick, A. E. & Boyd, D. (2014). Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social media. New Media & Society, 16(7): 1051–1067.MarwickA. E.BoydD.2014Networked privacy: How teenagers negotiate context in social mediaNew Media & Society1671051106710.1177/1461444814543995Search in Google Scholar
Mehl, M. & Gill, A. (2010). Automatic text analysis. In S. Gosling & J. Johnson (eds.), Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research (pp. 109–127). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.MehlM.GillA.2010Automatic text analysisInGoslingS.JohnsonJ.(eds.)Advanced methods for conducting online behavioral research109127Washington, DCAmerican Psychological Association10.1037/12076-008Search in Google Scholar
Menchen-Trevino, E. & Karr, C. (2012). Researching real-world web use with Roxy: Collecting observational web data with informed consent. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(3): 254–268.Menchen-TrevinoE.KarrC.2012Researching real-world web use with Roxy: Collecting observational web data with informed consentJournal of Information Technology & Politics9325426810.1080/19331681.2012.664966Search in Google Scholar
Miller, S. & Gatta, J. (2006). The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospects. Quality & Quantity, 40(4): 595–610.MillerS.GattaJ.2006The use of mixed methods models and designs in the human sciences: Problems and prospectsQuality & Quantity40459561010.1007/s11135-005-1099-0Search in Google Scholar
Mills, K. (2017). What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research? Qualitative Research 18(6): 591–603.MillsK.2017What are the threats and potentials of big data for qualitative research?Qualitative Research18659160310.1177/1468794117743465Search in Google Scholar
Morley, D. & Silverstone, R. (2002 [1991]). Media audiences, communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audience. In K. B. Jensen & N. Jankowski (eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp. 149–162). London: Routledge.MorleyD.SilverstoneR.2002 [1991]Media audiences, communication and context: Ethnographic perspectives on the media audienceInJensenK. B.JankowskiN.(eds.)A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research149162LondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Nyumba, T. O., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J. & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9: 20–32.NyumbaT. O.WilsonK.DerrickC. J.MukherjeeN.2018The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservationMethods in Ecology and Evolution9203210.1111/2041-210X.12860Search in Google Scholar
Patriarche, G., Bilandzic, H., Linaa Jensen, J. & Jurisic, J. (eds.) (2014). Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation. London: Routledge.PatriarcheG.BilandzicH.Linaa JensenJ.JurisicJ.(eds.)2014Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidationLondonRoutledge10.4324/9780203523155Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.RogersR.2013Digital methodsCambridge, MAThe MIT Press10.7551/mitpress/8718.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2015). Digital methods for web research. In R. Scott & S. Kosslyn (eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–22). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.RogersR.2015Digital methods for web researchInScottR.KosslynS.(eds.)Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences122Hoboken, NJJohn Wiley & Sons10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0076Search in Google Scholar
Scharkow, M. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1): 13–27.ScharkowM.2016The accuracy of self-reported Internet use: A validation study using client log dataCommunication Methods and Measures101132710.1080/19312458.2015.1118446Search in Google Scholar
Schrøder, K. C., Hasebrink, U., Hölig, S. & Barker, M. (2012). Introduction: Exploring the methodological synergies of multimethod audience research. Participation Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 9(2): 643–647.SchrøderK. C.HasebrinkU.HöligS.BarkerM.2012Introduction: Exploring the methodological synergies of multimethod audience researchParticipation Journal of Audience and Reception Studies92643647Search in Google Scholar
Simon, J. & Ess, C. (2015). The ONLIFE initiative: A concept reengineering exercise. Philosophy and Technology, 28(1): 157–162.SimonJ.EssC.2015The ONLIFE initiative: A concept reengineering exercisePhilosophy and Technology28115716210.1007/s13347-015-0189-8Search in Google Scholar
Smith, J. H., Dinev, T. & Xu, H. (2011). Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 35(4): 989–1015.SmithJ. H.DinevT.XuH.2011Information privacy research: An interdisciplinary reviewMIS Quarterly354989101510.2307/41409970Search in Google Scholar
Stewart, D. W. & Shamdasani, P. N. (2015). Focus groups: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.StewartD. W.ShamdasaniP. N.2015Focus groups: Theory and practice3rd ed.Los Angeles, CASageSearch in Google Scholar
Stewart, K. & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5: 395–416.StewartK.WilliamsM.2005Researching online populations: The use of online focus groups for social researchQualitative Research539541610.1177/1468794105056916Search in Google Scholar
Taksa, I., Spink, A. & Jansen, B. J. (2009). Web log analysis: Diversity of research methodologies. In B. J. Jansen, A. Spink & I. Taksa (eds.), Handbook of research on web log analysis (pp. 504––520). New York, NY: Information Science Reference.TaksaI.SpinkA.JansenB. J.2009Web log analysis: Diversity of research methodologiesInJansenB. J.SpinkA.TaksaI.(eds.)Handbook of research on web log analysis504520New York, NYInformation Science Reference10.4018/978-1-59904-974-8.ch025Search in Google Scholar
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The point of triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3): 253–258.ThurmondV. A.2001The point of triangulationJournal of Nursing Scholarship33325325810.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.xSearch in Google Scholar
Turney, L. & Pocknee, C. (2005). Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(2): 32–43.TurneyL.PockneeC.2005Virtual focus groups: New frontiers in researchInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods42324310.1177/160940690500400203Search in Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society, 12(2): 197–208.Van DijckJ.2014Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideologySurveillance & Society12219720810.24908/ss.v12i2.4776Search in Google Scholar
Vicente-Mariño, M. (2014). Audience research methods: Facing the challenge of transforming audiences. In G. Patriarche, H. Bilandzic, J. Linaa Jensen & J. Jelena (eds.), Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation (pp. 37–53). London: Routledge.Vicente-MariñoM.2014Audience research methods: Facing the challenge of transforming audiencesInPatriarcheG.BilandzicH.Linaa JensenJ.JelenaJ.(eds.)Audience research methodologies: Between innovation and consolidation3753LondonRoutledgeSearch in Google Scholar
Williams, S., Giatsi Clausen, M., Robertson, A., Peacock, S. & McPherson, K. (2012). Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4): 368–383.WilliamsS.Giatsi ClausenM.RobertsonA.PeacockS.McPhersonK.2012Methodological reflections on the use of asynchronous online focus groups in health researchInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods11436838310.1177/160940691201100405Search in Google Scholar