1. bookTom 14 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1338-4309
Pierwsze wydanie
03 Aug 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Measuring Whistleblowing Perceptions among the Civil Service of the Republic of Kosovo

Data publikacji: 02 Dec 2021
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 14 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 135 - 159
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
1338-4309
Pierwsze wydanie
03 Aug 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

In 2018, the Parliament of the Republic of Kosovo approved the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers, setting up the foundations of the whistleblower protection system for the public and private sectors in the country. In line with the international principles for drafting legislation for the protection of whistleblowers, the law provides three channels for reporting wrongdoing and grants protection against any form of retaliation for whistleblowers.

Noting the absence of institutional data on whistleblowing in the public sector, for this research article, a survey was implemented with individual members of civil service in Kosovo (n=400), during the period from September to November 2019, to collect primary data related to factors incentivizing and / or discouraging the decision to whistleblow. Data were collected at the national and local levels of state administration, as per the scope of the definition of the civil service by Kosovo legislation.

In this contribution, research results reveal that the protection against any form of retaliation guaranteed by the law is not sufficient for members of civil service in Kosovo to support the decision to whistleblow, as concerns arise for the security and physical integrity of their respective family members. Law does not provide financial incentives for civil servants to whistleblow. Data reveal that a satisfactory level of trust is missing on organizational indicators such as trust in the responsible officer, protection of data confidentiality and anonymity, across different levels of categories of civil service.

In line with the concerns voiced by members of civil service and international standards for whistleblower protection, the following actionable recommendations are proposed to advance the whistleblowing system in Kosovo: 1) Improve the provision of training for members of civil service on whistleblowing legislation, organizational procedures, whistleblower protection, and rights; 2) Establish strategies to support employees for whistleblowing. Such strategies would include programs enabling whistleblowers access to professional services such as stress management, counseling, and legal services; 3) Enhance security measures for the physical integrity of whistleblowers and their respective family members; 4) Establish incentives to encourage whistleblowing, such as financial rewards.

Keywords

Apaza, C. R. and Y. Chang. 2017. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In C. Apaza and Y. Chang (eds). Whistleblowing in the World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1 – 8. Search in Google Scholar

Apaza C. R., Chang Y. 2020. “Effective Whistleblowing Conceptual Framework.” In: Apaza C., Chang Y. (eds) What Makes Effective Whistleblowing. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 1 – 10. Search in Google Scholar

Assembly of Republic of Kosovo. 2018. “Law No. 06 / L-085 on Protection of Whistleblowers”. Available at https://md.rks-gov.net/desk/inc/media/701773B8-903F-476F-9D1E-2F7CC2C86A84.pdf (last accessed July 5, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A. J., Lawrence, S., Olsen J., Rosemann L., Hall K., Tsahuridu, E., Wheeler, Ch., Macaulay, M., Smith R., Brough, P. 2019.” Clean as a Whistle: A Five Step Guide to Better Whistleblowing Policy and Practice in Business and Government: Key Findings and Actions of Whistling While They Work 2”. Brisbane: Griffith University. Search in Google Scholar

Brown A. J. and S. A. Lawrence. 2017. Strengthening of Organizational Whistleblowing Processes: Analyses from Australia. Available at https://www.whistlingwhiletheywork.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/WWTW2-Strength-of-whistleblowing-processes-report-Australia-Griffith-University-2May2017.pdf (last accessed February 29, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Botrić, V. 2020. “Managers’ Perception of Corruption in Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 20(4), 699 – 731. DOI:10.31297/hkju.20.4.5.10.31297/hkju.20.4.5 Search in Google Scholar

Cho, Y. J. and H. J. Song. 2015. “Determinants of Whistleblowing within Government Agencies.” Public Personnel Management 44(4), 450 – 472. DOI:10.1177/0091026015603206.10.1177/0091026015603206 Search in Google Scholar

Dahsyla, E. 2020. “Drejtori i shkarkuar i ATK-së akuzon kryeministrin Hoti për nepotizëm.” Kallxo.com, 17 October. Available at https://kallxo.com/lajm/drejtori-i-shkarkuar-i-atk-se-akuzon-kryeministrin-hoti-per-nepotizem/ (last accessed February 9, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2020a. “North Macedonia 2020 Report”. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/north_macedonia_report_2020.pdf (last accessed February 9, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2020b. “Albania 2019 Report”. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20190529-albania-report.pdf (last accessed February 9, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Commission. 2020c. “Kosovo* 2020 Report”. Retrieved from kosovo_report_2020.pdf (europa.eu), (last accessed February 9, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament, Council of the European Union. “Directive 2019 / 1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Persons Who Report Breaches of Union Law”. 2019. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019L1937 (last accessed February 9, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Gottschalk, P. 2018. “Suspicion of White-Collar Crime: A Case Study of Retaliation against Whistle-Blowers.” International Criminal Justice Review, 1 – 12. doi. org/10.1177/105756771881428610.1177/1057567718814286 Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A. J., Lawrence, S. 2017. Integrity WERQ Guide. Available at http://www.whistlingwhiletheywork.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Integrity@WERQ-Guide-05.05.2017.pdf (last accessed March 10, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Hafner, M., J. Taylor, E. Disley, S. Thebes, M. Barberi, M. Stepanek and M. Levi. 2016. The Cost of Non-Europe in the Area of Organized Crime and Corruption. Brussels: RAND Europe. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/Reg-Data/etudes/STUD/2016/579319/EPRS_STU%282016%29579319_EN.pdf (last accessed October 28, 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Kenny, K. 2019. Whistleblowing: Toward a New Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674239715 Search in Google Scholar

Kosovo Anti-Corruption Agency. 2020 “Annual Report”. Available at https://www.akk-ks.org/assets/cms/uploads/files/Publikimet/Raporte/01.%20Raporti_Vjetor_i_Punes_AKK_viti_2019_ver_final_Shqip_AKK_Mars_2020.pdf (last accessed March 20, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Kosovo Institute of Public Administration. 2015. “Strategy of Training of Civil Servants 2016 – 2020”. Prishtina: Ministry of Public Administration of Republic of Kosovo. Search in Google Scholar

Kosovo Law Institute. 2020. “Analyses of the Implementation of the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers in Public Institutions”. Available at https://kli-ks.org/ikd-sinjalizim-publik-per-mos-zbatimin-e-ligjit-per-mbrojtjen-e-sinjalizuesve/ (last accessed March 5, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Langr, I. 2018. “Public Procurement in the Systemic Corruption Environment: Evidence from the Czech Republic.” NISPACEE Journal of Public Administration and Policy 11(2), 53 – 79. DOI:10.2478/nispa-2018-0013.10.2478/nispa-2018-0013 Search in Google Scholar

Lëvizja Fol. 2017. The Anti-Corruption Legal Reform: Analyses of the Law on the Protection of Informers. Available at http://levizjafol.org/analize-e-ligjit-per-mbrojtjen-e-informatoreve-ne-kosove/ (last accessed December 5, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Maliqi, Sh. 2021. “Court Pleads ‘not Guilty’ 12 Accused Persons for Adding KLA Veterans” Kallxo.com, 19 January Available at https://kallxo.com/lajm/gjykata-liron-12-te-akuzuarit-per-fryerjen-e-listave-te-veteraneve-te-uck-se/ (last accessed February, 9 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Moreira, P. 2019. “Resilient Institutions”. Available at https://www.transparency.org/en/news/resilient-institutions (last accessed date October 2, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Near, J. P. and M. P. Miceli. 1985. “Organizational Dissidence: The Case of Whistleblowing.” Journal of Business Ethics 4, 1 – 16. Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2014. “OECD Survey on Managing Conflict of Interest in the Executive Branch and Whistleblower Protection”. Paris: OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2016. Committing to Effective Whistleblower Protection. Paris: OECD Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2020. Civil Society Report on Human Rights in Kosovo in 2019. Available at https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/kosovo_cso_2019_human_rights_report_en.pdf (last accessed February 15, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Polunin, O. 2019. “The Case of Ukrainian Corruption: Phenomenology and Psychological Insides.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 58E, 116 – 132. DOI:10.24193/tras.58E.8.10.24193/tras.58E.8 Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, T. 2019. A Public Service: Whistleblowing, Disclosure and Anonymity. New York and London: OR Books.10.2307/j.ctvs1g95s Search in Google Scholar

Thüsing, G and G. Forst. 2016. “Whistleblowing around the World: A Comparative Analyses of Whistleblowing in 23 Countries.” In G. Thüsing and G. Forst (eds). Whistleblowing: A Comparative Study. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 3 – 30. Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International. 2013. “International Principles for Whistleblower Legislation”. Available at https://images.transparencycdn.org/images/2013_WhistleblowerPrinciples_EN.pdf (last accessed March 1, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Transparency International. 2020. “Corruption Perception Index”. Available at 2020 – CPI – Transparency.org (last accessed February 5, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Tudzarovska, Emilija. 2020. “The ‘Silent Guardians’ in the Fight against Corruption: The Case of North Macedonia.” Central European Public Administration Review 18(1), 165 – 184. DOI:10.17573/cepar.2020.1.08.10.17573/cepar.2020.1.08 Search in Google Scholar

United Nations, Office on Drugs and Crime. 2004. United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Vienna: United Nations. Available at https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf (last accessed February 6, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Vadera, A., R. Aguilera and B. Caza. 2009. “Making Sense of Whistle-Blowing’s Antecedents: Learning from Research on Identity and Ethics Programs.” Business Ethics Quarterly 19(4), 553 – 586. Search in Google Scholar

Whyatt, J. 2018. “Being a Whistleblower: ‘I wouldn’t Do it again”. Germany: European Centre for Press and Media Freedom. Available at ECPMF – Being a whistleblower: I wouldn’t do it again (last accessed February 8, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Xharra, J. and N. Tabak. 2014. “The Case of Maria Bamieh.” Prishtina Insight, 11 July. Available at https://prishtinainsight.com/case-maria-bamieh/ (last accessed February 8, 2021). Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo