[Ackrill, R., A. Kay and N. Zahariadis. 2013. “Ambiguity, Multiple Streams, and EU Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 20(6), 871 – 887.10.1080/13501763.2013.781824]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cairney, P. and M. D. Jones. 2016. “Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach: What Is the Empirical Impact of this Universal Theory ?” The Policy Studies Journal 44(1), 37 – 58.10.1111/psj.12111]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dan, S. and C. Pollitt. 2014. “NPM Can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17(9), 1305 – 1332.10.1080/14719037.2014.908662]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[European Commission. 2017a. Quality of Public Administration: A Toolbox for Practitioners. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[European Commission. 2017b. “ESF Support to Administrative Modernisation.” Background paper for discussion in the ESF Technical Working Group, April.]Search in Google Scholar
[Howlett, M., A. McConnell and A. Perl. 2015. “Streams and Stages: Reconciling Kingdon and Policy Process Theory.” European Journal of Political Research 54, 419 – 434.10.1111/1475-6765.12064]Search in Google Scholar
[Jones, B. and F. Baumgartner. 2012. “From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing.” The Policy Studies Journal 40(1), 1 – 20.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jones, M. D., H. L. Peterson, J. J. Pierce, N. Herweg, A. Bernal, H. L. Raney and N. Zahariadis. 2016. “A River Runs Through It: A Multiple Streams Meta-Review.” The Policy Studies Journal 44(1), 13 – 36.10.1111/psj.12115]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kickert, W., T. Randma-Liiv and R. Savi. 2015. “Politics of Fiscal Consolidation in Europe: A Comparative Analysis.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81, 562 – 584.10.1177/0020852314564312]Search in Google Scholar
[Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. 2004. Dėl Viešojo administravimo plėtros iki 2010 metų strategijos patvirtinimo. Available at https://www.e-tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.E223BEDD45FF (last accessed 18 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. 2012. Dėl Viešojo valdymo tobulinimo 2012 – 2020 metų programos patvirtinimo. Available at http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=418407&p_query=vie%F0ojo%20valdymo%20tobulinimo%20programa&p_tr2=2 (last accessed 18 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mintrom, M. and P. Norman. 2009. “Policy Entrepreneurship and Policy Change.” The Policy Studies Journal 37(4), 649 – 667.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V. 2015. “The Influence of Government Priorities on Public-Administration Reforms in Europe.” NISPACEE Journal of Public Administration and Policy 8(1), 21 – 40.10.1515/nispa-2015-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V. 2017. Report on Public Administration Reform Trends and Reform Dynamics in Lithuania. Unpublished report of the EUPACK project.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V., R. Vilpišauskas and E. Barcevičius. 2018. “Making Change Happen: Policy Dynamics in the Adoption of Major Reforms in Lithuania.” Public Policy and Administration. Available at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0952076718755568 URL (last accessed 8 February 2018).10.1177/0952076718755568URL(lastaccessed8February2018)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V., R. Vilpišauskas and D. Jahn. 2016. Lithuania Report, Sustainable Governance Indicators 2016. Available at http://www.sgi-network.org/docs/2016/country/SGI2016_Lithuania.pdf (last accessed 18 December 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakrošis, V., R. Vilpišauskas and V. Kuokštis. 2015. “Fiscal Consolidation and Structural Reforms in Lithuania in the Period 2008 – 2012: From Grand Ambitions to Hectic Firefighting.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 81(3), 522 – 540.10.1177/0020852315581786]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2015a. Annex to “The Public Governance Review Lithuania – Fostering Open and Inclusive Policy Making Key Findings and Recommendations.” Paris, OECD Conference Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2015b. Reviews of Regulatory Reform Regulatory Policy in Lithuania Focusing on the Delivery Side. Available at http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/governance/regulatory-policy-in-lithuania_9789264239340-en (last accessed 19 October 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2016. The Governance of Inclusive Growth An Overview of Country Initiatives: An Overview of Country Initiatives. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/governance/the-governance-of-inclusive-growth-9789264265189-en.htm (last accessed 18 October 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. and G. Bouckaert. 2011. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pump, B. 2011. “Beyond Metaphors: New Research on Agendas in the Policy Process.” The Policy Studies Journal 39 (S1), 1 – 12.10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00389_1.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rauleckas, R., V. Nakrošis, R. Šnapštienė and L. Šarkutė. 2016. “The Impact of Public Administration Reforms in Lithuania: Systemic Managerial Changes and Persisting Organizational Differences.” In G. Hammerschmid, S. Van de Walle, R. Andrews and P. Bezes (eds.) Public Administration Reforms in Europe. 1st edn. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 105 – 116.10.4337/9781783475407.00017]Search in Google Scholar