Evaluating ESG Software Solutions for Sustainability Reporting in the Manufacturing Sector

[1] Čufar, M., & Belak, J. (2024). Beyond Financials: Under-standing the Implications of NFRD and CSRD on Non-financial Reporting. Challenges in the Turbulent Economic Environment and Organizations’ Sustainable Development, pp. 185-194. https://doi.org/10.18690/um.epf.5.2024.18 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Stojanović-Blab, M., & Blab, D. (2024). Mandatory sustainability reporting – evolution of regulation in the european union. Facta Universitatis, Series: Economics and Organization, 241. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUEO240730016S Search in Google Scholar

[3] Jovanović, N., Pastirk, G., & Primec, A. (2024). Implementing CSR Concepts in the Slovenian Aluminium Industry: A Case Study. In M. Pucelj & R. Bohinc (Eds.), Advances in Marketing, Customer Relationship Management, and E-Services pp. 131-163. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5863-4.ch006 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Mezzanotte, F.E. (2023). Corporate sustainability reporting: double materiality, impacts, and legal risk. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 23(2), pp. 633-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2024.2319058 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fornasari, T., & Traversi, M. (2024). The Impact of the CSRD and the ESRS on Non-Financial Disclosure. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, 1, pp. 117-133. https://doi.org/10.4468/2024.1.07fornasari.traversi Search in Google Scholar

[6] Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 Amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as Regards Corporate Sustainability Reporting (Text with EEA Relevance), 322 OJ L (2022). http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj/eng Search in Google Scholar

[7] EFRAG approved the European Sustainability Reporting Standards. (n.d.). Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.onetrust.com/blog/efrag-eu-sustainability-reporting-standards/ Search in Google Scholar

[8] Brans, M., Bloemberg, R., & Felder, F. (2024). Reporting under the ‘E’ of the CSRD. An Overview of Legal Requirements and a Comparison With Existing Obligations under Environmental Law, Focussing on the Netherlands. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 33(Issue 5), pp. 232-245. https://doi.org/10.54648/EELR2024015 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Belidan, M.A., & Baghad, H. (2024). Navigating materiality in sustainability reporting: A scoping review of single and double materiality approaches. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, 48(4), pp. 11-32. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.8687 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Novicka, J., & Volkova, T. (2024). Regulation of Sustainability Reporting Requirements—Digitalisation Path. Sustainability, 17(1), 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17010138 Search in Google Scholar

[11] IDC MarketScape: Worldwide Corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance Reporting Technology 2023 Vendor Assessment. (n.d.). IDC: The Premier Global Market Intelligence Company. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://my.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=US50427023 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Green Quadrant: ESG & Sustainability Assurance Services 2024. (n.d.). Default. Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://www.verdantix.com/venture/report/green-quad-rant-esg-sustainability-assurance-services-2024 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hristov, I., & Searcy, C. (2025). Integrating sustainability with corporate governance: a framework to implement the corporate sustainability reporting directive through a balanced scorecard. Management Decision, 63(2), pp. 443-467. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2023-1995 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hüning, C., Koscher, E.M.K., & Hosseinkouchack, M. (2022). The Influence of Directive 2014/95/EU on the CSR Reporting of Stock-Listed European Companies. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2022(1), 15473. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2022.15473abstract Search in Google Scholar

[15] Dewi, A.A., Saraswati, E., Rahman, A.F., & Atmini, S. (2023). Materiality, stakeholder engagement disclosure, and corporate governance: Critical elements for the quality of sustainability reporting. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2175437. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2175437 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Baumgartner, R.J., & Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), pp. 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Saleh, A., Eliwa, Y., & Aboud, A. (2024). Does Mandating CSR Reporting in the EU Generate Horizontal Spillovers? The International Journal of Accounting, 2440001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1094406024400018 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Lindstrom, S. (2024, April 29). CSRD Compliance Creates Unique Challenges for Manufacturers. The Protiviti View. https://blog.protiviti.com/2024/04/29/crsd-compliance-creates-unique-challenges-for-manufacturers/ Search in Google Scholar

[19] Tascione, V., Corsi, K., & Manca, G. (2024). The Proposal for the New Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): Towards Better Environmental Data in Sustainability Reporting. In G. Lagioia, A. Paiano, V. Amicarelli, T. Gallucci, & C. Ingrao (Eds.), Innovation, Quality and Sustainability for a Resilient Circular Economy pp. 317-323. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55206-9_40 Search in Google Scholar

[20] Singh, S., & Singh, M. (2025). Role of Artificial Intelligence for Environment Protection: An Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5196899 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jadhav, A. S., & Sonar, R. M. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), pp. 555-563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Haug, A., Zachariassen, F., & Liempd, D. van. (2011). The costs of poor data quality. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(2), pp. 168-193. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem..v4n2.p168-193 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Shrouf, F., & Miragliotta, G. (2015). Energy management based on Internet of Things: practices and framework for adoption in production management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, pp. 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.055 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Puroila, J., & Mäkelä, H. (2019). Matter of opinion: Exploring the socio-political nature of materiality disclosures in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), pp. 1043-1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2016-2788 Search in Google Scholar

[25] Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), pp. 470-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1813 Search in Google Scholar

[26] Moya, S. (2024). Sustainability reporting regulation: current situation and future developments. In L. Parrondo & O. Amat (Eds.), Research Handbook on Financial Accounting pp. 121-137. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803920597.00015 Search in Google Scholar

[27] ESG Software Market Size, Share & Growth Report, 2030. (n.d.). Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/esg-software-market-report Search in Google Scholar

[28] Lee, S.H., & Lee, I.H. (2021). Discussion on Implementation of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4077622 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Martinčević, I., Primorac, D., & Dorić, B. (2024). Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): Obligations, Challenges and Requirements for Companies. ENTRENOVA – ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion, 10(1), pp. 317-327. https://doi.org/10.54820/entrenova-2024-0026 Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence driven approaches to strengthening Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria in sustainable business practices: a review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4843215 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Peng, J., Gao, J., Tong, X., Guo, J., Yang, H., Qi, J., Li, R., Li, N., & Xu, M. (2024). Advanced Unstructured Data Processing for ESG Reports: A Methodology for Structured Transformation and Enhanced Analysis. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2401.02992 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Kulkarni, A., Joseph, S., & Patil, K. (2023). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Sustainability Reporting by Leveraging ESG Theory into Action. 2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (In-CACCT), pp. 795-800. https://doi.org/10.1109/In-CACCT57535.2023.10141584 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Lee, S.U., Perera, H., Liu, Y., Xia, B., Lu, Q., Zhu, L., Cairns, J., & Nottage, M. (2024). Integrating ESG and AI: A Comprehensive Responsible AI Assessment Framework. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2408.00965 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Chen, S. (2024). The Influence of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technology on ESG Reporting Quality. International Journal of Global Economics and Management, 3(1), pp. 301-310. https://doi.org/10.62051/IJGEM.v3n1.36 Search in Google Scholar

[35] Correia, A., & Água, P.B. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence for enhanced environmental, social, and governance reporting: A new paradigm in corporate transparency. Corporate Governance: Research and Advanced Practices, pp. 92-98. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgrapp15 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020). Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 53, 102104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijin-fomgt.2020.102104 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Zhou, Y., Cao, Y., & Perzylo, A. (2024). Towards Digital Sustainability Reporting: An Ontology for Mapping of Indicators in GRI and ESRS. In A. Salatino, M. Alam, F. Ongenae, S. Vahdati, A.-L. Gentile, T. Pellegrini, & S. Jiang (Eds.), Studies on the Semantic Web. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW240016 Search in Google Scholar

[38] Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018). Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 94(9), pp. 3563-3576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 Search in Google Scholar

[39] Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57(7), pp. 2117-2135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 Search in Google Scholar

[40] Markova-Karpuzova, M., Marinov, E., & Kotzev, N. (2024). Sustainable solutions: advancing in tech-based ESG reporting platforms. Environment. Technologies. Resources. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference, 1, pp. 235-241. https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2024vol1.7947 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Li, N., Kim, M., Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence in ESG Assurance. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 21(2), pp. 83-99. https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-2022-054 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Bhanot, N., Rao, P.V., & Deshmukh, S.G. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, pp. 4412-4439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcle-pro.2016.11.123 Search in Google Scholar

[43] Ranking narzędzi raportowania ESG 2024. (n.d.). CSRinfo. Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://www.csrinfo.org/ranking-narzedzi-raportowania-esg-2024/ Search in Google Scholar

[44] Top ESG Reporting Tools: Verdantix 2023 Insights. (n.d.). Sphera. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://sphera.com/resources/research/verdantix-green-quadrant-esg-reporting-and-data-management-software-2023/ Search in Google Scholar

[45] ESG Reporting|Smart & Easy. (n.d.). Canvas. Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://explore.besmarthead.com/pl Search in Google Scholar

[46] Zarządzanie CSR/ESG i śladem węglowym. (n.d.). Diaphane Software. Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://diaph-anesoftware.com/pl/ Search in Google Scholar

[47] More accessible than ever: IBM Envizi ESG Suite now available in seven languages|IBM. (2023, October 11). https://www.ibm.com/new/announcements/more-accessible-than-ever-ibm-envizi-esg-suite-now-available-in-seven-languages Search in Google Scholar

[48] Envirly – przejmij kontrolę nad zrównoważonym rozwojem i ESG swojej firmy. (n.d.). Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://www.envirly.pl/ Search in Google Scholar

[49] ESG & Sustainability Reporting Software|Greenomy. (n.d.). Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://www.greenomy.io/ Search in Google Scholar

[50] APLANET|ESG Management & Reporting Software for Sustainability. (n.d.). Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://aplanet.org/ Search in Google Scholar

[51] Velma ESG. (n.d.). Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://velmaesg.com/ Search in Google Scholar

[52] PricewaterhouseCoopers. (n.d.). Software solution for non-financial reporting & ESG. PwC. Retrieved July 6, 2025, from https://www.pwc.com/cz/en/temata/esg-management-solution.html Search in Google Scholar