Otwarty dostęp

Land development policy as related to real estate influenced by railway noise in the context of allowable indicators that have been recently modified in Poland


Zacytuj

Figure 1

Location of the analysed areas, Warsaw, PolandSource: own elaboration
Location of the analysed areas, Warsaw, PolandSource: own elaboration

Figure 2

The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area 1 (Ursus)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area 1 (Ursus)Source: own elaboration

Figure 3

The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area 1 (Ursus)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area 1 (Ursus)Source: own elaboration

Figure 4

The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area II (Białołęka)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area II (Białołęka)Source: own elaboration

Figure 5

The area of “acoustic release” when changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area II (Białołęka)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” when changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area II (Białołęka)Source: own elaboration

Figure 6

The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area III (Ursynów)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” after changing the permissible sound levels in the night time in the area under analysis, Area III (Ursynów)Source: own elaboration

Figure 7

The area of “acoustic release” when changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area III (Ursynów)Source: own elaboration
The area of “acoustic release” when changing the permissible sound levels in the day-evening-night time in the area under analysis, Area III (Ursynów)Source: own elaboration

Analysis indicators

Indicator name Indicator symbol Indicator formula
„Acoustic release” - Night WUALN FLN50dBFLN59dBFLN50dB {{{F_{LN \to 50dB}} - {F_{LN \to 59dB}}} \over {{F_{LN \to 50dB}}}}
“Acoustic release” - Day-Dawn-Night W1UALDWN FLDWN55dBFLDWN64dBFLDWN55dB {{{F_{LDWN \to 55dB}} - {F_{LDWN \to 64dB}}} \over {{F_{LDWN \to 55dB}}}}
W2UALDWN FLDWN60dBFLDWN68dBFLDWN60dB {{{F_{LDWN \to 60dB}} - {F_{LDWN \to 68dB}}} \over {{F_{LDWN \to 60dB}}}}
“Acoustic-functional release” - Night WUFALN FTULN50dBFTULN59dBFTULN50dB {{FT{U_{LN \to 50dB}} - FT{U_{LN \to 59dB}}} \over {FT{U_{LN \to 50dB}}}}
“Acoustic-functional release” - Day-Dawn-Night W1UFALDWN FTULDWN55dBFTULDWN64dBFTULDWN55dB {{FT{U_{LDWN \to 55dB}} - FT{U_{LDWN \to 64dB}}} \over {FT{U_{LDWN \to 55dB}}}}
W2UFALDWN FTULDWN60dBFTULDWN68dBFTULDWN60dB {{FT{U_{LDWN \to 60dB}} - FT{U_{LDWN \to 68dB}}} \over {FT{U_{LDWN \to 60dB}}}}
„Construction-acoustic” - General/Night WBALN LBLN50dBLBLN59dBLBLN50dB {{L{B_{LN \to 50dB}} - L{B_{LN \to 59dB}}} \over {L{B_{LN \to 50dB}}}}
“Construction-acoustic” – General/Day-Dawn-Night W1BALDWN LBLDWN55dBLBLDWN64dBLBLDWN55dB {{L{B_{LDWN \to 55dB}} - L{B_{LDWN \to 64dB}}} \over {L{B_{LDWN \to 55dB}}}}
W2BALDWN LBLDWN60dBLBLDWN68dBLBLDWN60dB {{L{B_{LDWN \to 60dB}} - L{B_{LDWN \to 68dB}}} \over {L{B_{LDWN \to 60dB}}}}

The values of acoustic indicators within the analysed areas

Feature symbol Feature value
URSUS (Area I) BIAŁOŁĘKA (Area II) URSYNÓW (Area III)
WUA LN 0.38 0.66 0.90
W1UALDWN 0.60 0.66 0.98
W2UALDWN 0.70 0.68 0.89
WUFALN 0.93 0.71 0.96
W1UFALDWN 0.97 0.66 0.64
W2UFALDWN 0.97 0.74 0.94
WBALN 0.72 0.76 1.00
W1BALDWN 0.68 0.71 0.96
W2BALDWN 0.67 0.86 1.00

Features of sensitivity to noise within the boundaries of the analysed areas

Feature No. Feature symbol Feature unit Feature value
URSUS (I) BIAŁOŁĘKA (II) URSYNÓW (III)
1 FLN→50dB m2 208 637 323 317 120 815
2 FLN→59dB m2 64 584 109 909 12 656
3 FLDWN→55dB m2 254 671 412 510 197 708
4 FLDWN→60dB m2 166 783 242 193 79 266
5 FLDWN→64dB m2 101 011 140 877 30 685
6 FLDWN→68dB m2 49 357 77 107 8 495
7 LBLN→50dB units 138 163 12
8 LBLN→59dB units 38 39 0
9 LBLDWN→55dB units 171 197 27
10 LBLDWN→60dB units 102 124 7
11 LBLDWN→64dB units 55 59 1
12 LBLDWN→68dB units 33 17 0
13 LMZW→TK m 64 - -
14 LZM→OT m 75 - -
15 LZJ→TK m 11 22 18
16 LZJ→OT m 24 34 24
17 FTULDWN→55dB m2 58 305 14 3670 17 326
18 FTULDWN→64dB m2 1 643 48 851 1 096
19 FTULDWN→60dB m2 61 237 99 139 4 157
20 FTULDWN→68dB m2 1 643 25 607 255
21 FTULN→50dB m2 91 538 134 242 8 531
22 FTULN→59dB m2 6 550 39 126 351

Areas and percentage shares of the terrains with exceeded noise levels caused by rail noise within the analysed boundaries according to acoustic maps from 2012 and 2017

Isophone name DISTRICT Year 2012 Year 2017
Noise-endangered area Terrain percentage Noise-endangered area Terrain percentage
[ha] [%] [ha] [%]
LN → 59 dB URSUS (I) 3.79 7.64 6.46 13.03
LDWN → 64 dB 8.61 17.38 10.10 20.38
LDWN → 68 dB 4.33 8.74 4.94 9.96
LN → 59 dB BIAŁOŁĘKA (II) 4.55 6.93 10.99 16.74
LDWN → 64 dB 6.68 10.18 14.09 21.46
LDWN → 68 dB 2.71 4.13 7.71 11.74
LN → 59 dB URSYNÓW (III) 1.53 1.23 1.27 1.01
LDWN → 64 dB 4.13 3.30 3.07 2.45
LDWN → 68 dB 1.23 0.98 0.85 0.68
eISSN:
2084-6118
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Geosciences, Geography, other