Land development policy as related to real estate influenced by railway noise in the context of allowable indicators that have been recently modified in Poland
25 lip 2021
O artykule
Data publikacji: 25 lip 2021
Zakres stron: 155 - 168
Otrzymano: 21 lut 2021
Przyjęty: 06 maj 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0062
Słowa kluczowe
© 2021 Konrad Podawca et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Analysis indicators
„Acoustic release” - Night | WUALN |
|
“Acoustic release” - Day-Dawn-Night | W1UALDWN |
|
W2UALDWN |
|
|
“Acoustic-functional release” - Night | WUFALN |
|
“Acoustic-functional release” - Day-Dawn-Night | W1UFALDWN |
|
W2UFALDWN |
|
|
„Construction-acoustic” - General/Night | WBALN |
|
“Construction-acoustic” – General/Day-Dawn-Night | W1BALDWN |
|
W2BALDWN |
|
The values of acoustic indicators within the analysed areas
WUA LN | 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.90 |
W1UALDWN | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.98 |
W2UALDWN | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
WUFALN | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.96 |
W1UFALDWN | 0.97 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
W2UFALDWN | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.94 |
WBALN | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
W1BALDWN | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.96 |
W2BALDWN | 0.67 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
Features of sensitivity to noise within the boundaries of the analysed areas
1 | FLN→50dB | m2 | 208 637 | 323 317 | 120 815 |
2 | FLN→59dB | m2 | 64 584 | 109 909 | 12 656 |
3 | FLDWN→55dB | m2 | 254 671 | 412 510 | 197 708 |
4 | FLDWN→60dB | m2 | 166 783 | 242 193 | 79 266 |
5 | FLDWN→64dB | m2 | 101 011 | 140 877 | 30 685 |
6 | FLDWN→68dB | m2 | 49 357 | 77 107 | 8 495 |
7 | LBLN→50dB | units | 138 | 163 | 12 |
8 | LBLN→59dB | units | 38 | 39 | 0 |
9 | LBLDWN→55dB | units | 171 | 197 | 27 |
10 | LBLDWN→60dB | units | 102 | 124 | 7 |
11 | LBLDWN→64dB | units | 55 | 59 | 1 |
12 | LBLDWN→68dB | units | 33 | 17 | 0 |
13 | LMZW→TK | m | 64 | - | - |
14 | LZM→OT | m | 75 | - | - |
15 | LZJ→TK | m | 11 | 22 | 18 |
16 | LZJ→OT | m | 24 | 34 | 24 |
17 | FTULDWN→55dB | m2 | 58 305 | 14 3670 | 17 326 |
18 | FTULDWN→64dB | m2 | 1 643 | 48 851 | 1 096 |
19 | FTULDWN→60dB | m2 | 61 237 | 99 139 | 4 157 |
20 | FTULDWN→68dB | m2 | 1 643 | 25 607 | 255 |
21 | FTULN→50dB | m2 | 91 538 | 134 242 | 8 531 |
22 | FTULN→59dB | m2 | 6 550 | 39 126 | 351 |
Areas and percentage shares of the terrains with exceeded noise levels caused by rail noise within the analysed boundaries according to acoustic maps from 2012 and 2017
LN → 59 dB | URSUS (I) | 3.79 | 7.64 | 6.46 | 13.03 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 8.61 | 17.38 | 10.10 | 20.38 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 4.33 | 8.74 | 4.94 | 9.96 | |
LN → 59 dB | BIAŁOŁĘKA (II) | 4.55 | 6.93 | 10.99 | 16.74 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 6.68 | 10.18 | 14.09 | 21.46 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 2.71 | 4.13 | 7.71 | 11.74 | |
LN → 59 dB | URSYNÓW (III) | 1.53 | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.01 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 4.13 | 3.30 | 3.07 | 2.45 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 1.23 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.68 |