Land development policy as related to real estate influenced by railway noise in the context of allowable indicators that have been recently modified in Poland
Jul 25, 2021
About this article
Published Online: Jul 25, 2021
Page range: 155 - 168
Received: Feb 21, 2021
Accepted: May 06, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0062
Keywords
© 2021 Konrad Podawca et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Analysis indicators
„Acoustic release” - Night | WUALN |
|
“Acoustic release” - Day-Dawn-Night | W1UALDWN |
|
W2UALDWN |
|
|
“Acoustic-functional release” - Night | WUFALN |
|
“Acoustic-functional release” - Day-Dawn-Night | W1UFALDWN |
|
W2UFALDWN |
|
|
„Construction-acoustic” - General/Night | WBALN |
|
“Construction-acoustic” – General/Day-Dawn-Night | W1BALDWN |
|
W2BALDWN |
|
The values of acoustic indicators within the analysed areas
WUA LN | 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.90 |
W1UALDWN | 0.60 | 0.66 | 0.98 |
W2UALDWN | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
WUFALN | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.96 |
W1UFALDWN | 0.97 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
W2UFALDWN | 0.97 | 0.74 | 0.94 |
WBALN | 0.72 | 0.76 | 1.00 |
W1BALDWN | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.96 |
W2BALDWN | 0.67 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
Features of sensitivity to noise within the boundaries of the analysed areas
1 | FLN→50dB | m2 | 208 637 | 323 317 | 120 815 |
2 | FLN→59dB | m2 | 64 584 | 109 909 | 12 656 |
3 | FLDWN→55dB | m2 | 254 671 | 412 510 | 197 708 |
4 | FLDWN→60dB | m2 | 166 783 | 242 193 | 79 266 |
5 | FLDWN→64dB | m2 | 101 011 | 140 877 | 30 685 |
6 | FLDWN→68dB | m2 | 49 357 | 77 107 | 8 495 |
7 | LBLN→50dB | units | 138 | 163 | 12 |
8 | LBLN→59dB | units | 38 | 39 | 0 |
9 | LBLDWN→55dB | units | 171 | 197 | 27 |
10 | LBLDWN→60dB | units | 102 | 124 | 7 |
11 | LBLDWN→64dB | units | 55 | 59 | 1 |
12 | LBLDWN→68dB | units | 33 | 17 | 0 |
13 | LMZW→TK | m | 64 | - | - |
14 | LZM→OT | m | 75 | - | - |
15 | LZJ→TK | m | 11 | 22 | 18 |
16 | LZJ→OT | m | 24 | 34 | 24 |
17 | FTULDWN→55dB | m2 | 58 305 | 14 3670 | 17 326 |
18 | FTULDWN→64dB | m2 | 1 643 | 48 851 | 1 096 |
19 | FTULDWN→60dB | m2 | 61 237 | 99 139 | 4 157 |
20 | FTULDWN→68dB | m2 | 1 643 | 25 607 | 255 |
21 | FTULN→50dB | m2 | 91 538 | 134 242 | 8 531 |
22 | FTULN→59dB | m2 | 6 550 | 39 126 | 351 |
Areas and percentage shares of the terrains with exceeded noise levels caused by rail noise within the analysed boundaries according to acoustic maps from 2012 and 2017
LN → 59 dB | URSUS (I) | 3.79 | 7.64 | 6.46 | 13.03 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 8.61 | 17.38 | 10.10 | 20.38 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 4.33 | 8.74 | 4.94 | 9.96 | |
LN → 59 dB | BIAŁOŁĘKA (II) | 4.55 | 6.93 | 10.99 | 16.74 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 6.68 | 10.18 | 14.09 | 21.46 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 2.71 | 4.13 | 7.71 | 11.74 | |
LN → 59 dB | URSYNÓW (III) | 1.53 | 1.23 | 1.27 | 1.01 |
LDWN → 64 dB | 4.13 | 3.30 | 3.07 | 2.45 | |
LDWN → 68 dB | 1.23 | 0.98 | 0.85 | 0.68 |