Otwarty dostęp

Can nonhumans speak? Languaging and worlds in posthumanist applied linguistics


Zacytuj

Affifi, R., 2013. Learning plants: Semiosis between the parts and the whole. Biosemiotics, 6(3), 547–559. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9164-x >. Search in Google Scholar

Appleby, R., Pennycook, A., 2017. Swimming with sharks, ecological feminism and posthuman language politics. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2), 239–261. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1279545 >. Search in Google Scholar

Augustyn, P., 2018. Animal studies in the language sciences. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 121–138. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9313-3 >. Search in Google Scholar

Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 >. Search in Google Scholar

Becker, A. L., 1991. Language and languaging. Language & Communication, 11, 33–35. Search in Google Scholar

Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., 2016. Why only us. Language and evolution. MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Blaser, M., 2009. Political ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023 >. Search in Google Scholar

Blaser, M., 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/672270 >. Search in Google Scholar

Blaser, M., 2016. Is another cosmopolitics possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570, available at: < https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05 >. Search in Google Scholar

Bloome, D., Beauchemin, F., 2016. Languaging everyday life in classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 152–165. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336916661533 >. Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., 2006. Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232 >. Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., 2013. The posthuman. Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., 2019a. A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486 >. Search in Google Scholar

Braidotti, R., 2019b. Transversal posthumanities. Philosophy Today, 63(4), 1181–1195. available at: < https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020128318 >. Search in Google Scholar

Callus, I., Herbrechter, S., 2012. Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject. Subjectivity, 5(3), 241–264. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.17 >. Search in Google Scholar

Canagarajah, A. S., 2006. After disinvention: Possibilities for communication, community and competence. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 233–239. Search in Google Scholar

Carrithers, M., Candea, M., Sykes, K. et al., 2010. Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory. Critique of Anthropology, 30, 152–200, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070 >. Search in Google Scholar

Cerrone, M., 2018. Umwelt and ape language experiments: On the role of iconicity in the human-ape pidgin language. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 41–63. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9312-4 >. Search in Google Scholar

Chernela, J., 2018. Language in an ontological register: Embodied speech in the Northwest Amazon of Colombia and Brazil. Language & Communication, 63, 23–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.006 >. Search in Google Scholar

Cobley, P., 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Copson, A., 2015. What is humanism? In Copson, A., Grayling, A. C. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of humanism. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1–34. Search in Google Scholar

Cornips, L., van den Hengel, L., 2021. Place-making by cows in an intensive dairy farm: A sociolinguistic approach to nonhuman animal agency. In Bovenkerk, B., Keulartz, J. (Eds.), Animals in our midst: The challenges of co-existing with animals in the anthropocene. pp. 177–202. Search in Google Scholar

Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., De Jaegher, H., 2015. From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089–1125. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9 >. Search in Google Scholar

de la Cadena, M., Blaser, M. (Eds.), 2018. A world of many worlds. Duke University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Dediu, D., Levinson, S. C., 2018. Neanderthal language revisited: Not only us. Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49–55. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.001 >. Search in Google Scholar

Deely, J., 2015. Building a scaffod: Semiosis in nature and culture. Biosemiotics, 8, 341–360. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9237-0 >. Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Continuum. Search in Google Scholar

Delgado, L. E., Romero, R. J., 2000. Local histories and global designs: An interview with Walter Mignolo. Discourse, 22, 7–33. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1353/dis.2000.0004 >. Search in Google Scholar

Demuro, E., Gurney, L., 2021. Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 1–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101307 >. Search in Google Scholar

Errington, J., 1999. Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 115–117. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.115 >. Search in Google Scholar

Escobar, A., 2016. Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e >. Search in Google Scholar

Evans, N., Levinson, S. C., 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X >. Search in Google Scholar

Faltýnek, D., Lacková, L., 2021. In the case of protosemiosis: Indexicality vs. iconicity of proteins. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 209–226. Search in Google Scholar

Ferrando, F., 2013. Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32. Search in Google Scholar

Ferrando, F., 2016a. Humans have always been posthuman: A spiritual geneaology of posthumanism. In Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. R. (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. Springer, pp. 243–256. Search in Google Scholar

Ferrando, F., 2016b. The Party of the anthropocene: Post-humanism, environmentalism and the post-anthropocentric paradigm shift. Relations: Beyond anthropocentrism, 4(2), 160–173. Search in Google Scholar

Gamble, C., 2011. The social and material life of Neanderthals. In Conard, N. J., Richter, J. (Eds.), Neanderthal lifeways, subsistence and technology: One hundred fifty years of Neanderthal study. Springer, pp. 157–166. Search in Google Scholar

Gaylard, R., 2004. “Welcome to the world of our humanity”: (African) humanism, ubuntu and black South African writing. Journal of Literary Studies, 20(3–4), 265–282. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710408530357 >. Search in Google Scholar

Guimarães, S. W. F., Silva, H. P., 2020. What have the revelations about Neanderthal DNA revealed about Homo sapiens? Anthropological Review, 83(1), 93–107. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0008 >. Search in Google Scholar

Gurney, L., & Demuro, E., 2022. Tracing new ground, from language to languaging, and from languaging to assemblages: Rethinking languaging through the multilingual and ontological turns. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 305–324. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1689982 >. Search in Google Scholar

Hauck, J. D., Heurich, G. O., 2018. Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication, 63, 1–8. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.005 >. Search in Google Scholar

Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S., 2007. Introduction: Thinking through things. In Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S. (Eds.), Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically.: Routledge, pp. 1–31. Search in Google Scholar

Heywood, P., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology, available at: < http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn#h2ref-1 >. Search in Google Scholar

Holbraad, M., 2020. The shapes of relations: Anthropology as conceptual morphology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(6), 495–522, available at: < doi:10.1177/0048393120917917 >. Search in Google Scholar

Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Hope, J., 2017. Various shapes of cultural biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 397–411. Search in Google Scholar

Johansson, S., 2015. Language abilities in Neanderthals. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 311–332, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124945 >. Search in Google Scholar

Kohn, E., 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311–327. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127 >. Search in Google Scholar

Kubota, R., Miller, E. R., 2017. Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 129–157. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 >. Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Y. T., 2003. Daoistic humanism in ancient China: Broadening personality and counseling theories in the 21st century. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(1), 64–85. Search in Google Scholar

Letiche, H., 2017. Bewildering pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 14(3), 236–255. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2017.1335662 >. Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., Evans, N., 2010. Time for a sea-change in linguistics: Response to comments on ‘The myth of language universals’. Lingua, 120(12), 2733–2758. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.08.001 >. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, G., Jones, B., Baker, C., 2012. Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 >. Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, S. L., Maslin, M. A., 2015. Defining the anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 >. Search in Google Scholar

Li, W., 2018. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 >. Search in Google Scholar

Love, N., 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26(6), 525–544. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003 >. Search in Google Scholar

Lyons, N., 2019. Signs in the dust: A theory of natural culture and cultural nature. Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Makoni, S., Pennycook, A., 2006. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–41. Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois. Search in Google Scholar

Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (revised edition) (R. Paolucci, Trans.). Shambhala Publications, Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Orman, J., 2013. New lingualisms, same old codes. Language Sciences, 37, 90–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.001 >. Search in Google Scholar

Pedersen, M., 2012. Common Nonsense: A Review of Recent Reviews of the ‘Ontological Turn’. Anthropology of this Century, 5. available at: < http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/ >. Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, A., 2018a. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016 >. Search in Google Scholar

Pennycook, A., 2018b. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Pepperberg, I. M., 2017. Animal language studies: What happened? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 181–185. available at: < https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1101-y >. Search in Google Scholar

Peters, M. A., 2015. The humanist bias in Western philosophy and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(11), 1128–1135. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.991497 >. Search in Google Scholar

Ryan, J. C., 2020. Writing the lives of plants: Phytography and the botanical imagination. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 35(1), 97–122. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2020.1720181 >. Search in Google Scholar

Sebeok, T., 2010. Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation and prospects. In Favareau, D. (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Springer, pp. 217–236. Search in Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L. et al., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785 >. Search in Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., McNeill, J. R., 2007. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 >. Search in Google Scholar

Steffen, W., Rockström J., Richardson, K. et al., 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 8252–8259, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 >. Search in Google Scholar

Tallerman, M., 2014. No syntax saltation in language evolution. Language Sciences, 46, 207–219. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.08.002 >. Search in Google Scholar

Thibault, P. J., 2017. The reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language. Language Sciences, 61, 74–85. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.014 >. Search in Google Scholar

Tønnessen, M., 2015. Umwelt and language. In Velmezova, E., Kull, K., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics. Springer, pp. 77–96. Search in Google Scholar

Uexküll, J., 2010. Foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press. Search in Google Scholar

Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. et al., 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494 >. Search in Google Scholar

Viveiros de Castro, E., 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157 >. Search in Google Scholar

Viveiros de Castro, E., 2004. Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-7299066 >. Search in Google Scholar

Viveiros de Castro, E., 2015. Who Is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(1), 2, available at: < https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102 >. Search in Google Scholar

Wallin, J., 2013. One hundred trillion anomals take the stand. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 11–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.789993 >. Search in Google Scholar

Wolfendale, P., 2019. The reformatting of Homo Sapiens. Angelaki, 24(1), 55–66. Search in Google Scholar

Woolard, K. A., Schieffelin, B. B., 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 >. Search in Google Scholar