[
Affifi, R., 2013. Learning plants: Semiosis between the parts and the whole. Biosemiotics, 6(3), 547–559. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-013-9164-x >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Appleby, R., Pennycook, A., 2017. Swimming with sharks, ecological feminism and posthuman language politics. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2), 239–261. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1279545 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Augustyn, P., 2018. Animal studies in the language sciences. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 121–138. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9313-3 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barad, K., 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, A. L., 1991. Language and languaging. Language & Communication, 11, 33–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berwick, R. C., Chomsky, N., 2016. Why only us. Language and evolution. MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaser, M., 2009. Political ontology. Cultural Studies, 23(5–6), 873–896. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380903208023 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaser, M., 2013. Ontological conflicts and the stories of peoples in spite of Europe: Toward a conversation on political ontology. Current Anthropology, 54(5), 547–568. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1086/672270 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaser, M., 2016. Is another cosmopolitics possible? Cultural Anthropology, 31(4), 545–570, available at: < https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.05 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bloome, D., Beauchemin, F., 2016. Languaging everyday life in classrooms. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 65(1), 152–165. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336916661533 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, R., 2006. Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, R., 2013. The posthuman. Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, R., 2019a. A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276418771486 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braidotti, R., 2019b. Transversal posthumanities. Philosophy Today, 63(4), 1181–1195. available at: < https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday2020128318 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Callus, I., Herbrechter, S., 2012. Introduction: Posthumanist subjectivities, or, coming after the subject. Subjectivity, 5(3), 241–264. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2012.17 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Canagarajah, A. S., 2006. After disinvention: Possibilities for communication, community and competence. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 233–239.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carrithers, M., Candea, M., Sykes, K. et al., 2010. Ontology is just another word for culture: Motion tabled at the 2008 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory. Critique of Anthropology, 30, 152–200, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X09364070 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cerrone, M., 2018. Umwelt and ape language experiments: On the role of iconicity in the human-ape pidgin language. Biosemiotics, 11(1), 41–63. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9312-4 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chernela, J., 2018. Language in an ontological register: Embodied speech in the Northwest Amazon of Colombia and Brazil. Language & Communication, 63, 23–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.02.006 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cobley, P., 2016. Cultural implications of biosemiotics. Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Copson, A., 2015. What is humanism? In Copson, A., Grayling, A. C. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of humanism. Wiley Blackwell, pp. 1–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornips, L., van den Hengel, L., 2021. Place-making by cows in an intensive dairy farm: A sociolinguistic approach to nonhuman animal agency. In Bovenkerk, B., Keulartz, J. (Eds.), Animals in our midst: The challenges of co-existing with animals in the anthropocene. pp. 177–202.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cuffari, E. C., Di Paolo, E., De Jaegher, H., 2015. From participatory sense-making to language: There and back again. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1089–1125. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9404-9 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de la Cadena, M., Blaser, M. (Eds.), 2018. A world of many worlds. Duke University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dediu, D., Levinson, S. C., 2018. Neanderthal language revisited: Not only us. Current Opinions in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49–55. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.01.001 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deely, J., 2015. Building a scaffod: Semiosis in nature and culture. Biosemiotics, 8, 341–360. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-015-9237-0 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deleuze, G., Guattari, F., 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Delgado, L. E., Romero, R. J., 2000. Local histories and global designs: An interview with Walter Mignolo. Discourse, 22, 7–33. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1353/dis.2000.0004 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Demuro, E., Gurney, L., 2021. Languages/languaging as world-making: The ontological bases of language. Language Sciences, 83, 1–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101307 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Errington, J., 1999. Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 9(1–2), 115–117. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.115 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escobar, A., 2016. Thinking-feeling with the Earth: Territorial struggles and the ontological dimension of the epistemologies of the south. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana, 11(1), 11–32. available at: < https://doi.org/10.11156/aibr.110102e >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Evans, N., Levinson, S. C., 2009. The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(5), 429–448. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faltýnek, D., Lacková, L., 2021. In the case of protosemiosis: Indexicality vs. iconicity of proteins. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 209–226.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrando, F., 2013. Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrando, F., 2016a. Humans have always been posthuman: A spiritual geneaology of posthumanism. In Banerji, D., Paranjape, M. R. (Eds.), Critical posthumanism and planetary futures. Springer, pp. 243–256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrando, F., 2016b. The Party of the anthropocene: Post-humanism, environmentalism and the post-anthropocentric paradigm shift. Relations: Beyond anthropocentrism, 4(2), 160–173.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gamble, C., 2011. The social and material life of Neanderthals. In Conard, N. J., Richter, J. (Eds.), Neanderthal lifeways, subsistence and technology: One hundred fifty years of Neanderthal study. Springer, pp. 157–166.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gaylard, R., 2004. “Welcome to the world of our humanity”: (African) humanism, ubuntu and black South African writing. Journal of Literary Studies, 20(3–4), 265–282. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/02564710408530357 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guimarães, S. W. F., Silva, H. P., 2020. What have the revelations about Neanderthal DNA revealed about Homo sapiens? Anthropological Review, 83(1), 93–107. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2020-0008 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gurney, L., & Demuro, E., 2022. Tracing new ground, from language to languaging, and from languaging to assemblages: Rethinking languaging through the multilingual and ontological turns. International Journal of Multilingualism, 19(3), 305–324. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2019.1689982 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hauck, J. D., Heurich, G. O., 2018. Language in the Amerindian imagination: An inquiry into linguistic natures. Language & Communication, 63, 1–8. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.03.005 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S., 2007. Introduction: Thinking through things. In Henare, A., Holbraad, M., Wastell, S. (Eds.), Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically.: Routledge, pp. 1–31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heywood, P., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge encyclopedia of anthropology, available at: < http://www.anthroencyclopedia.com/entry/ontological-turn#h2ref-1 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holbraad, M., 2020. The shapes of relations: Anthropology as conceptual morphology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 50(6), 495–522, available at: < doi:10.1177/0048393120917917 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holbraad, M., Pedersen, M. A., 2017. The ontological turn. Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hope, J., 2017. Various shapes of cultural biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 10(3), 397–411.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johansson, S., 2015. Language abilities in Neanderthals. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1(1), 311–332, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguist-030514-124945 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kohn, E., 2015. Anthropology of ontologies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 311–327. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014127 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubota, R., Miller, E. R., 2017. Re-examining and re-envisioning criticality in language studies: Theories and praxis. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 129–157. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2017.1290500 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Y. T., 2003. Daoistic humanism in ancient China: Broadening personality and counseling theories in the 21st century. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 43(1), 64–85.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Letiche, H., 2017. Bewildering pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 14(3), 236–255. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2017.1335662 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, S. C., Evans, N., 2010. Time for a sea-change in linguistics: Response to comments on ‘The myth of language universals’. Lingua, 120(12), 2733–2758. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.08.001 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, G., Jones, B., Baker, C., 2012. Translanguaging: Developing its conceptualisation and contextualisation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 655–670. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2012.718490 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, S. L., Maslin, M. A., 2015. Defining the anthropocene. Nature, 519(7542), 171–180. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14258 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, W., 2018. Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30, available at: < http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Love, N., 2004. Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26(6), 525–544. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2004.09.003 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyons, N., 2019. Signs in the dust: A theory of natural culture and cultural nature. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Makoni, S., Pennycook, A., 2006. Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S., Pennycook, A. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages. Multilingual Matters, pp. 1–41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., 1970. Biology of cognition. BCL Report # 9.0. University of Illinois.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maturana, H. R., Varela, F. J., 1987. The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding (revised edition) (R. Paolucci, Trans.). Shambhala Publications, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orman, J., 2013. New lingualisms, same old codes. Language Sciences, 37, 90–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.001 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pedersen, M., 2012. Common Nonsense: A Review of Recent Reviews of the ‘Ontological Turn’. Anthropology of this Century, 5. available at: < http://aotcpress.com/articles/common_nonsense/ >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pennycook, A., 2018a. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pennycook, A., 2018b. Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pepperberg, I. M., 2017. Animal language studies: What happened? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(1), 181–185. available at: < https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1101-y >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, M. A., 2015. The humanist bias in Western philosophy and education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(11), 1128–1135. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.991497 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ryan, J. C., 2020. Writing the lives of plants: Phytography and the botanical imagination. a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 35(1), 97–122. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2020.1720181 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebeok, T., 2010. Biosemiotics: Its roots, proliferation and prospects. In Favareau, D. (Ed.), Essential readings in biosemiotics: Anthology and commentary. Springer, pp. 217–236.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L. et al., 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., McNeill, J. R., 2007. The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 36(8), 614–621. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steffen, W., Rockström J., Richardson, K. et al., 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 8252–8259, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallerman, M., 2014. No syntax saltation in language evolution. Language Sciences, 46, 207–219. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.08.002 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thibault, P. J., 2017. The reflexivity of human languaging and Nigel Love’s two orders of language. Language Sciences, 61, 74–85. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.09.014 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tønnessen, M., 2015. Umwelt and language. In Velmezova, E., Kull, K., Cowley, S. J. (Eds.), Biosemiotic perspectives on language and linguistics. Springer, pp. 77–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uexküll, J., 2010. Foray into the worlds of animals and humans: With a theory of meaning. University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. et al., 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science, 277(5325), 494–499. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5325.494 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viveiros de Castro, E., 1998. Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 4(3), 469–488. available at: < https://doi.org/10.2307/3034157 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2004. Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge, 10(3), 463–484. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-7299066 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viveiros de Castro, E., 2015. Who Is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf? The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology, 33(1), 2, available at: < https://doi.org/10.3167/ca.2015.330102 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallin, J., 2013. One hundred trillion anomals take the stand. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 11–13, available at: < https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.789993 >.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolfendale, P., 2019. The reformatting of Homo Sapiens. Angelaki, 24(1), 55–66.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Woolard, K. A., Schieffelin, B. B., 1994. Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23, 55–82. available at: < https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 >.
]Search in Google Scholar