This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Icten B.M., Kiral B.G. & Deniz M.E. Impactor diameter effect on low velocity impact response of woven glass epoxy composite plates. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, (50): 325-332.Search in Google Scholar
Avila A.F., Soares M.I. & Neto A.S. A study on nanostructured laminated plates behavior under low-velocity impact loadings. International journal of impact engineering, 2007, 34(1): 28-41.Search in Google Scholar
Naik N.K. & Shrirao P. Composite structures under ballistic impact. Compos Struct 2004; 66(8): 578–90.Search in Google Scholar
Chib A. Parametric study of low velocity impact analysis on composite tubes. University of Pune, Maharashtra, India, dissertation thesis. 2006.Search in Google Scholar
Mitrevski T., Marshall I.H., Thomson R., Jones R. & Whittingham B. The effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates. Compos Struct, 2005, (67): 139-48.Search in Google Scholar
Mitrevski T., Marshall I.H., Thomson R. & Jones R. The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composite laminates. Compos Struct, 2006, (76): 116-22.Search in Google Scholar
Baucom J.N., Zikry M.A. & Rajendran A.M. Low-velocity impact damage accumulation in woven S2-glass composite systems. Composites science and technology, 2006, 66(10): 1229-1238.Search in Google Scholar
Reddy T.S., Mogulanna K., Reddy K.G., Reddy P.R.S. & Madhu V. Effect of thickness on behaviour of E-glass/epoxy composite laminates under low velocity impact. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2019, (14): 265-272.Search in Google Scholar
Adams, D.F. & Miller A.K. An analysis of the impact behavior of hybrid composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering 19.2 (1975): 245-260.Search in Google Scholar
Ojoc G.G. & Deleanu L. Laboratory scale technology for a ballistic protection panel and preliminary results. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022, (1262): 012058.Search in Google Scholar
Yaneva S. Ballistic resistance of bulletproof vests level IIIA. Development of testing methodology. EDP Sciences. In MATEC Web of Conferences, (2020): 317.Search in Google Scholar
Military standard: MIL-STD-662F, V50 Ballistic test for Armor, Department of Defense, USA 1997.Search in Google Scholar
Hazell P.J., Gareth J. Appleby-Thomas. The impact of structural composite materials. Part 1: ballistic impact. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 2012, (47): 396-405.Search in Google Scholar
Kinsler R. & Collins J. Comparison of V50 shot placement on final outcome, Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5068, ARL-RP-0506, Proceedings of the PASS 2012 Personal Armour Systems Symposium, Nuremberg, Germany, 17–20 September 2012. (accessed 2.04.2023), https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA613200.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Chinella J.F., Pothier B. & Wells M.G. Processing, mechanical properties, and ballistic impact effects of austempered ductile iron. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD, 1998.Search in Google Scholar