Analyzing Impact Behaviour of Glass Fiber Epoxy Composites for Higher Safety Systems

[1] Icten B.M., Kiral B.G. & Deniz M.E. Impactor diameter effect on low velocity impact response of woven glass epoxy composite plates. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, (50): 325-332.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Avila A.F., Soares M.I. & Neto A.S. A study on nanostructured laminated plates behavior under low-velocity impact loadings. International journal of impact engineering, 2007, 34(1): 28-41.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Naik N.K. & Shrirao P. Composite structures under ballistic impact. Compos Struct 2004; 66(8): 578–90.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Chib A. Parametric study of low velocity impact analysis on composite tubes. University of Pune, Maharashtra, India, dissertation thesis. 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Mitrevski T., Marshall I.H., Thomson R., Jones R. & Whittingham B. The effect of impactor shape on the impact response of composite laminates. Compos Struct, 2005, (67): 139-48.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Mitrevski T., Marshall I.H., Thomson R. & Jones R. The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composite laminates. Compos Struct, 2006, (76): 116-22.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Baucom J.N., Zikry M.A. & Rajendran A.M. Low-velocity impact damage accumulation in woven S2-glass composite systems. Composites science and technology, 2006, 66(10): 1229-1238.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Reddy T.S., Mogulanna K., Reddy K.G., Reddy P.R.S. & Madhu V. Effect of thickness on behaviour of E-glass/epoxy composite laminates under low velocity impact. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2019, (14): 265-272.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Adams, D.F. & Miller A.K. An analysis of the impact behavior of hybrid composite materials. Materials Science and Engineering 19.2 (1975): 245-260.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ojoc G.G. & Deleanu L. Laboratory scale technology for a ballistic protection panel and preliminary results. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022, (1262): 012058.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Yaneva S. Ballistic resistance of bulletproof vests level IIIA. Development of testing methodology. EDP Sciences. In MATEC Web of Conferences, (2020): 317.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Military standard: MIL-STD-662F, V50 Ballistic test for Armor, Department of Defense, USA 1997.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hazell P.J., Gareth J. Appleby-Thomas. The impact of structural composite materials. Part 1: ballistic impact. The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 2012, (47): 396-405.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kinsler R. & Collins J. Comparison of V50 shot placement on final outcome, Army Research Laboratory Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5068, ARL-RP-0506, Proceedings of the PASS 2012 Personal Armour Systems Symposium, Nuremberg, Germany, 17–20 September 2012. (accessed 2.04.2023), https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA613200.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Chinella J.F., Pothier B. & Wells M.G. Processing, mechanical properties, and ballistic impact effects of austempered ductile iron. Army Research Lab Aberdeen Proving Ground MD, 1998.Search in Google Scholar