Effect of the addition of different forms of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) on the quality of vacuum-packed minced pork
Data publikacji: 23 wrz 2024
Zakres stron: 419 - 426
Otrzymano: 15 mar 2024
Przyjęty: 02 wrz 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jvetres-2024-0047
Słowa kluczowe
© 2024 Katarzyna Śmiecińska et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Preservatives and antioxidants prolong the shelf-life of meat and meat products, mostly by inhibiting fat rancidification and microbiological processes (9). Synthetic antioxidants such as butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) limit lipid oxidation, but they may also exert adverse effects on human health (35). Consumers are increasingly likely to make informed food choices and avoid meat products containing synthetic additives. In turn, food producers often replace synthetic additives with natural substances to meet customer expectations (12). Research has shown that natural antioxidants are often more effective than synthetic additives in preventing adverse changes in the quality of meat and meat products (6). Recent years have witnessed a growing interest in plant-based preparations because of their natural origin and health-promoting properties. These substances exhibit anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities, reduce the risk of atherosclerosis, diabetes and heart attack, decrease blood cholesterol levels and blood pressure, and boost the immune system (18). Apart from their antioxidant activity, plant-derived bioactive compounds can also positively affect the quality of meat and meat products by improving their sensory and microbiological properties and preventing discolouration (28).
Herbs and spices, including rosemary (
The antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of rosemary have been described in the literature (4, 17), and they have been attributed to the presence of phenolic acids (caffeic, ferulic and rosmarinic acids) and phenolic diterpenes (carnosic acid and carnosol). However, the relative efficacies of different forms of rosemary have been insufficiently investigated (14, 34). The optimal amounts and forms of the natural plant-based additives used in the meat industry should be established, and their effectiveness in preserving various types of fresh and processed meat should be evaluated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine if the quality of vacuum-packaged and cold-stored minced pork was significantly affected by the addition of rosemary and to what different extents it was affected by different forms (oleoresin – ROL, extract – REX and essential oil – REO). The analysed parameters were the rate of lipid oxidation, pH, colour, microbiological quality and sensory properties, which were evaluated during refrigerated storage.
The experimental materials comprised 12 samples of
The muscle samples were processed in an electric meat mincer to pass through a 2.7 mm mesh screen and divided into four portions. The first, the control portion (C) contained no additives. Natural food additives approved for use and available in retailers were added at 15 mg/kg of meat to the remaining portions. Rosemary oleoresin (ROL) was added to the second portion, rosemary extract (REX) was added to the third and rosemary essential oil (REO) to the fourth. The final amounts of additives were determined based on the results of a preliminary laboratory study. A sensory analysis was performed by a consumer assessment conducted by university staff members. Samples were evaluated before storage (ST0) and after 7 (ST7) and 14 (ST14) days of storage in a refrigerator (2°C). The weight of each sample was approximately 200 g (10 samples per group). The ST7 and ST14 samples were vacuum packaged in polyamide/polyethylene bags with enhanced gas barrier performance (permeability: O2 = 27 cm3/m2/24 h/0.1 Mpa; CO2 = 86 cm3/m2/24 h/0.1 Mpa; N2 = 8 cm3/m2/24 h/0.1 Mpa; moisture vapour < 3.5 g/m2/24 h) with the use of a PP15 (MGO) Tepro Vacu Tronic 2000 vacuum packaging machine (Tepro, Koszalin, Poland). The vacuum-packaging procedure achieved a vacuum of 99%, equal to 1.3 kPa. Samples for assessment at ST0 were not packaged.
The pH of the investigated meat was measured in homogenates (meat-to-distilled water ratio of 1 : 1) with a Polilyte Lab combination electrode (Hamilton Bonaduz, Bonaduz, Switzerland) and a 340i pH-meter equipped with a TFK 325 temperature sensor (WTW Wissenschaftlich-Technische Werkstätten, Weilheim, Germany).
The rate of lipid oxidation was determined in a thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) assay. Absorbance was measured with a Specord 40 spectrophotometer (Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany) at a wavelength of 532 nm. The TBARS value was expressed as mg of malondialdehyde (MDA) per kg of meat (25) using the following formula:
Colour was determined based on the standard colour space values of L* (lightness), a* (redness) and b* (yellowness) as well as C* (chroma) and h° (hue angle). The L*, a* and b* parameters were measured by the reflectance method using a HunterLab MiniScan XE Plus spectrocolorimeter (Hunter Associates Laboratory, Reston, VA, USA) with the standard D65 illuminant, a 10° standard observer angle and a 2.54-cm-diameter aperture. The values of L*, a* and b* were the means of three replicate measurements performed at random sites across the muscle before and after storage, on unpackaged samples. The apparatus was standardised using black and white standard plates. The values of C* were calculated from the following formula: C* = (a*2 + b*2)1/2. The values of h° were calculated from the following formula: h° = tan-1(b ÷ a).
A sensory analysis was performed by six panellists in individual compartments illuminated with white light (500 lx) and maintained at a temperature of 2°C. The colour, taste and aroma of the meat were assessed after heating to 96°C in a 0.6% NaCl solution for 90 min. Between evaluations, the panellists were offered still mineral water with a neutral taste and aroma for cleansing the palate. The samples were spherical in shape and had a weight of around 20 g. The samples were evaluated by the panellists immediately after heat treatment. All sensory attributes of the samples were evaluated during a single session on a nine-point scale: 9 – liked extremely, 8 – liked very much, 7 – liked moderately, 6 – liked slightly, 5 – neither liked nor dislike, 4 – disliked slightly, 3 – disliked moderately, 2 – disliked very much, 1 – disliked extremely.
The preparation of samples for microbiological analysis, identification of bacterial colonies and counting of the identified bacteria (
The results were processed statistically using the Statistica version 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA). The normality of data distribution was checked by the Shapiro–Wilk test. The effects of experimental factors – additive (C, ROL, REX or REO) and storage time (ST0, ST7 or ST14) – on the analysed parameters of meat and their interactions were determined by two-way analysis of variance. Since interactions between the experimental factors were not found (P-value > 0.05), the significance of differences between group means was estimated by Tukey’s test and the significance of differences between group means was determined at P-value ≤ 0.05. Variability was expressed as the standard error of the mean.
The effect of different forms of rosemary and of ST on the pH and TBARS values (mg MDA/kg of meat) of the minced pork is presented in Table 1.
Mean thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) values as mg malondialdehyde/kg meat and pH values of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary
Additive | Storage time (ST) | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C n = 30 | ROL n = 30 | REX n = 30 | REO n = 30 | ST0 n = 40 | ST7 n = 40 | ST14 n = 40 | Additive | ST | ||
pH | 5.68 b | 5.72 a | 5.68 b | 5.70 b | 5.68 b | 5.69 b | 5.72 a | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
TBARS | 0.49 a | 0.39 a | 0.41 a | 0.13 b | 0.36 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.013 | <0.001 | 0.146 |
– superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage
Pork samples to which ROL had been added were characterised by higher pH values than the control samples (C) and samples with the addition of REX and REO (P-value < 0.001). The pH of the vacuum-packaged pork was also influenced by ST, and was higher at ST14 than at ST0 and ST7 (P-value < 0.001).
Storage time had no impact on oxidative changes in minced pork (P-value = 0.146). Rosemary essential oil was most effective in preventing lipid oxidation (P-value < 0.001), whereas no significant differences in TBARS values were observed between C, ROL and REX samples (P-value > 0.05).
The colour parameters (L*, a*, b*, C* and h°) of minced pork are presented in Table 2.
Mean colour parameters (lightness (L*), redness (a*), yellowness (b*), chroma (C*) and hue angle (h°)) of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary
Additive | Storage time (ST) | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C n = 30 | ROL n = 30 | REX n = 30 | REO n = 30 | ST0 n = 40 | ST7 n = 40 | ST14 n = 40 | Additive | ST | ||
L* | 58.55 b, c | 59.61 a | 57.74 b | 60.24 a | 59.03 | 59.03 | 59.04 | 0.142 | <0.001 | 0.964 |
a* | 9.45 b | 8.31 b, c | 9.72 b | 10.66 a | 9.36 | 9.55 | 9.70 | 0.127 | <0.001 | 0.183 |
b* | 17.56 a, b, c | 22.34 a | 21.12 b | 19.00 c | 19.96 | 20.01 | 20.05 | 0.215 | <0.001 | 0.824 |
C* | 19.96 b, c | 23.84 a | 23.25 a | 21.79 b | 22.10 | 22.19 | 22.32 | 0.187 | <0.001 | 0.546 |
h° | 61.79 b | 69.62 a | 65.29 b, c | 60.74 b | 64.74 | 63.22 | 63.98 | 0.419 | <0.001 | 0.371 |
– superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage
The addition of ROL and REO caused an increase in the values of L* relative to these values where REX was added and where nothing was added (C) (P-value < 0.001). Meat samples with the addition of REO had stronger redness (a*), and meat samples with the addition of ROL displayed more yellowness (b*), compared with the remaining samples (P-value < 0.001). Pork seasoned with ROL and REX was characterised by higher chroma (C*) values than C and REO samples (P-value < 0.001), and the hue angles (h°) were higher in pork containing ROL than in the remaining samples (P-value < 0.001). All colour parameters remained highly stable during storage (P-value > 0.05).
The panellists scored the heated minced pork samples as shown in Table 3.
Mean scores for sensory properties of minced pork without and with one of three forms of rosemary, as assessed by six panellists
Additive | Storage time (ST) | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C n = 30 | ROL n = 30 | REX n = 30 | REO n = 30 | ST0 n = 40 | ST7 n = 40 | ST14 n = 40 | Additive | ST | ||
Aroma | 7.02 b, c | 7.95 a | 8.15 a | 7.40 b | 7.53 | 7.65 | 7.72 | 0.069 | <0.001 | 0.177 |
Colour | 7.25 b | 7.30 b | 7.75 a | 7.60 a | 7.22 b | 7.68 a | 7.72 a | 0.048 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Taste | 7.30 b, c | 8.20 a | 8.45 a | 6.65 b | 7.52 | 7.68 | 7.77 | 0.087 | <0.001 | 0.153 |
9 – liked extremely; 8 – liked very much; 7 – liked moderately; 6 – liked slightly; 5 – neither liked nor dislike; 4 – disliked slightly; 3 – disliked moderately; 2 – disliked very much; 1 – disliked extremely
– superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage
Rosemary extract exerted the most beneficial influence on the aroma, taste and colour of minced pork (P-value < 0.001). Samples containing ROL also received high scores for aroma and taste, and samples with the addition of REO scored highly for colour. Control and REO samples were characterised by the lowest aroma and taste desirability (P-value < 0.001). Only colour was significantly affected by ST, and it received higher scores at ST7 and ST14 than at ST0 (P-value < 0.001).
Bacteria of the
Microbiological quality as mean log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/g of minced pork without or with one of three forms of rosemary
Additive | Storage time (ST) | SEM | P-value | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C n = 30 | ROL n = 30 | REX n = 30 | REO n = 30 | ST0 n = 40 | ST7 n = 40 | ST14 n = 40 | Additive | ST | ||
1.76 | 2.24 | 2.23 | ND | ND | 1.12 b | 3.11 a | 0.339 | 0.054 | <0.001 | |
0.98 | 2.07 | 1.74 | ND | ND | 0.98 b | 2.40 a | 0.284 | 0.059 | <0.001 | |
Lactic acid bacteria | 3.54 a | 3.38 | 3.41 | 2.86 b | 3.26 | 3.29 | 3.33 | 0.093 | 0.048 | 0.709 |
Total aerobic psychrotrophic bacteria | 2.20 | 2.46 | 2.52 | 2.05 | ND | 2.45 b | 4.62 a | 0.378 | 0.971 | <0.001 |
a, b – superscript letters indicate significant difference within an experimental factor (P-value ≤ 0.05); SEM – standard error of the mean; C – control (meat without additives); ROL – meat with rosemary oleoresin; REX – meat with rosemary extract; REO – meat with rosemary essential oil; ST0 – before storage; ST7 – after 7 days of storage; ST14 – after 14 days of storage; ND – not detected (below the detection limit and <1 × 101 CFU/g)
The counts of all identified bacteria increased during storage (P-value < 0.001), and only the increase in the abundance of LAB was not significant.
The pH value of meat is an important parameter that affects various quality attributes such as colour, texture, water-retention capacity, flavour and the stability of its microbial population (7). Meat should have the lowest possible pH during storage to ensure shelf-life stability. Vergara
Amariei
Lipids may undergo changes in response to biochemical (enzymes) and chemical factors (presence of molecular oxygen and exposure to light, increased temperature or water). Lipid oxidation leads to the formation of various compounds such as aldehydes and ketones, which may induce undesirable changes in the colour, aroma, taste, texture and nutritional value of meat and meat products (4). Adverse changes in lipids can be limited provided that meat is stored under conditions that suppress enzyme activity,
According to Borella
Hać-Szymańczuk
Piruz and Khani (26) observed a minor influence of ST on the colour of vacuum-packaged and refrigerated chicken breast muscles to which REO or thyme essential oil had been added, which is consistent with the present findings. According to Abdelfattah
In the current study, minced pork containing REO was characterised by the highest values of L* and a*. Semenova
The less desirable aroma of the control samples could be caused by higher LAB counts (3.54 log CFU/g). According to Kaur
Hać-Szymańczuk
Borella
Piruz and Khani (26) compared the efficacy of thyme essential oil and REO added to vacuum-packaged and refrigerated chicken breast muscles and found that both additives improved the colour of experimental samples relative to the control samples, but that the taste and odour of meat were not desirable at higher additive concentrations. A similar influence of REO was also observed in this experiment, most likely because REO emits a strong aroma composed of camphor (14.5%), cineol (12%), borneol (10.5%), pinene (8.5%) and camphene (7%) (8). Therefore, the concentration of REO should be properly adjusted to different types of meat and meat products.
According to Kompelly
Similarly to this experiment, the study by Hać-Szymańczuk
Al-Hijazeen (2) compared the bacteriostatic activity of oregano essential oil and REX with that of a BHA/BHT mixture in minced chicken and found that a combination of oregano essential oil and REX exerted the highest antibacterial effect, noting the effect to be significantly stronger (P-value > 0.05). However, the antibacterial effect of synthetic BHA/BHT was comparable to that of the natural additives when the latter were added separately. According to Vergara
In the investigation by Vergara
The results of this study indicate that rosemary has antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, and that this additive may positively affect the colour and sensory attributes of pork, in particular when combined with vacuum packaging. However, the effect exerted by rosemary on meat quality may vary depending on the physical form of the herb. Lipid oxidation was most effectively inhibited by rosemary essential oil. The tested rosemary-based additives and, probably, the vacuum packaging, delayed lipid oxidation during storage, which significantly extended the shelf life of the meat. Moreover, rosemary, in particular essential oil, had a beneficial influence on the colour of minced pork. The values of all colour parameters remained highly stable during storage. Microbial growth was suppressed only by essential oil, whereas the addition of rosemary extract exerted the most beneficial effect on the aroma, colour and taste of minced pork. An analysis of the impact of storage time on the examined quality attributes of pork revealed that refrigerated storage could be prolonged beyond 14 days with the use of the tested additives and vacuum packaging.