[Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions, Oxford University Press on Demand.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Issues in Second Language Research, ERIC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gil, K. H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 117-149.10.1075/lab.3.2.01gil]Search in Google Scholar
[Goad, H. & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22, 243-268.10.1191/0267658306sr268oa]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The emergence of language, 197-212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Green, G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity, Indiana University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. & Wilson, R. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 203-257.10.2307/415332]Search in Google Scholar
[Hamdan, J. (1997). The acquisition of the dative alternation UG markedness or L1 transfer? Dirasat. Human and social sciences, 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 20-55.10.1177/026765838700300104]Search in Google Scholar
[Ibn S-Saraaj, M. B. S. (1996). Al-Aušool fi Al-Nahwi, Beirut, Al-Resalah Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐ Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English. Language Learning, 47, 637-669.10.1111/0023-8333.00024]Search in Google Scholar
[Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition, Routledge.10.4324/9780203935927]Search in Google Scholar
[Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In: Liceras J, Zobl H and Goodluck, H. (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum, 106-40.10.4324/9781315085340-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173-227.10.1177/0267658308100283]Search in Google Scholar
[Lardiere, D. (2013). Linguistic approaches to second language morphosyntax. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 106-126). Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry, 335-391.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lefebvre, C., White, L. & Jourdan, C. 2006. L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: dialogues, John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lald.42]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language learning, 34, 91-108.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00997.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 7, 15-35.10.1017/S0272263100005131]Search in Google Scholar
[Miyagawa, S. & Tsujioka, T. (2004). Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 1-38.10.1023/B:JEAL.0000007345.64336.84]Search in Google Scholar
[Oehrle, R. T. (1976). The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 407-439.10.1177/0267658310365786]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition : the acquisition of argument structure, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sawyer, M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1996. 646-657.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research, 12, 40-72.10.1177/026765839601200103]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22-47.10.1177/026765839300900102]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527678]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4]Search in Google Scholar
[White, L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies, 1, 189-207.10.1017/S0959269500000983]Search in Google Scholar
[Whong-Barr, M. & Schwartz, B. D.(2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579-616.10.1017/S0272263102004035]Search in Google Scholar