Second Language Acquisition of the English Dative Alternation by Native Speakers of Arabic

Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions, Oxford University Press on Demand.Search in Google Scholar

Gass, S. M. & Selinker, L. (1983). Language Transfer in Language Learning. Issues in Second Language Research, ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

Gil, K. H., & Marsden, H. (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3(2), 117-149.10.1075/lab.3.2.01gilSearch in Google Scholar

Goad, H. & White, L. (2006). Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research, 22, 243-268.10.1191/0267658306sr268oaSearch in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, A. E. (1999). The emergence of the semantics of argument structure constructions. The emergence of language, 197-212.Search in Google Scholar

Green, G. M. (1974). Semantics and syntactic regularity, Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R. & Wilson, R. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 203-257.10.2307/415332Search in Google Scholar

Hamdan, J. (1997). The acquisition of the dative alternation UG markedness or L1 transfer? Dirasat. Human and social sciences, 24.Search in Google Scholar

Hawkins, R. (1987). Markedness and the acquisition of the English dative alternation by L2 speakers. Second Language Research, 3, 20-55.10.1177/026765838700300104Search in Google Scholar

Ibn S-Saraaj, M. B. S. (1996). Al-Aušool fi Al-Nahwi, Beirut, Al-Resalah Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Inagaki, S. (1997). Japanese and Chinese Learners' Acquisition of the Narrow‐ Range Rules for the Dative Alternation in English. Language Learning, 47, 637-669.10.1111/0023-8333.00024Search in Google Scholar

Jarvis, S. & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition, Routledge.10.4324/9780203935927Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In: Liceras J, Zobl H and Goodluck, H. (eds) The role of formal features in second language acquisition. New York:Lawrence Erlbaum, 106-40.10.4324/9781315085340-5Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 25: 173-227.10.1177/0267658308100283Search in Google Scholar

Lardiere, D. (2013). Linguistic approaches to second language morphosyntax. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 106-126). Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic inquiry, 335-391.Search in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, C., White, L. & Jourdan, C. 2006. L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: dialogues, John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/lald.42Search in Google Scholar

Mazurkewich, I. (1984). The acquisition of the dative alternation by second language learners and linguistic theory. Language learning, 34, 91-108.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1984.tb00997.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mazurkewich, I. (1985). Syntactic markedness and language acquisition. Studies in second language acquisition, 7, 15-35.10.1017/S0272263100005131Search in Google Scholar

Miyagawa, S. & Tsujioka, T. (2004). Argument structure and ditransitive verbs in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, 1-38.10.1023/B:JEAL.0000007345.64336.84Search in Google Scholar

Oehrle, R. T. (1976). The grammatical status of the English dative alternation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Oh, E. (2010). Recovery from first-language transfer: The second language acquisition of English double objects by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 26, 407-439.10.1177/0267658310365786Search in Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition : the acquisition of argument structure, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, M. (1996). L1 and L2 sensitivity to semantic constraints on argument structure. Proceedings of the 20th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 1996. 646-657.Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. D. & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second language research, 12, 40-72.10.1177/026765839601200103Search in Google Scholar

Sorace, A. (1993). Incomplete vs. divergent representations of unaccusativity in non native grammars of Italian. Second Language Research, 9, 22-47.10.1177/026765839300900102Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511527678Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2000). Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition, 74, 209-253.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00069-4Search in Google Scholar

White, L. (1991). Argument structure in second language acquisition. Journal of French Language Studies, 1, 189-207.10.1017/S0959269500000983Search in Google Scholar

Whong-Barr, M. & Schwartz, B. D.(2002). Morphological and syntactic transfer in child L2 acquisition of the English dative alternation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 579-616.10.1017/S0272263102004035Search in Google Scholar