Otwarty dostęp

Effect of Storage Temperature and Postharvest Tuber Treatment with Chemical and Biorational Inhibitors on Suppression of Sprouts During Potato Storage


Zacytuj

INTRODUCTION

The production and consumption of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) has increased in Kenya and other tropical countries in recent years, due to the introduction of disease and insect resistant cultivars adapted to tropical highland environments (Lung’aho et al. 2006; Olanya et al. 2012). Postharvest losses of agricultural commodities have been associated with poor or inadequate storage conditions and often accounts for approximately 30% of losses of total harvested crops (Gustavsson et al. 2011). In the developing countries, the losses of harvested agricultural commodity such as potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) have often been exacerbated due to the elevated storage temperatures at on-farm locations and the suboptimum post-harvest processing and produce handling conditions (Wustman & Struik 2007).

With the increase in market potential of potato tubers in Kenya (Scott et al. 2000), the evaluation of storage temperature conditions that could impact sprout development, tuber weight loss and produce quality have been of considerable importance. Low storage temperatures have often been used to prolong the storability of potato by lengthening the natural dormancy (Wiltshire & Cobb 1996). Published reports have indicated that storage temperatures of 2–4 °C are suitable for long-term storage of potato, since there is limited sprout development (Paul et al. 2016). However, low temperature storage of ware potatoes destined for either fresh consumption or post-harvest processing have shown accumulation of reducing sugars (glucose and fructose) and some degree of sweetening of potato tubers (Sonnewald 2001).

To limit the cold-induced sugar accumulation in potato tubers, long-term storage of potato is done at 8–12 °C. However, this storage temperature is favorable for sprouting, hence treatment with sprout inhibitors becomes essential for successful long-term storage. For newly developed potato cultivars earmarked for utilization in tropical environments, there are limited published data on storage potential and the effects of storage temperatures and sprout inhibitors on tuber sprout suppression. It has been hypothesized that in the absence of postharvest treatment of potato tubers with sprout suppressants, the rate of sprout development on tubers increases with temperature. In general, at 3–20 °C temperature range during storage, the length of tuber dormancy is inversely proportional to temperature (Wiltshire & Cobb 1996). However, the effects of temperature on tuber dormancy depends on cultivar, with different cultivars breaking dormancy at different times even when stored at the same temperature. Respiration rates of potato tubers have been reported to have a minimum at about 4 °C and increase at higher temperatures (Wustman & Struik 2007). In the highland tropics where temperature variation occurs rapidly and extensively, the relationship between temperature and tuber dormancy has not been demonstrated.

Chlorpropham (CIPC) – isopropyl N-(3-chlorophenyl)carbamate – mitosis inhibitor, is the most commonly used sprout suppressant on potatoes (Paul et al. 2016; Smith & Bucher 2012). However, there has been an increasing concern about the toxicity of its residue and degradation of products, which negatively impact the environment and human health (Smith & Bucher 2012). As a result, in several countries, the use of CIPC and other chemicals are restricted with ban of CIPC in the EU by 2020 (EU 2019/989 of 17 June). There is thus a considerable interest in finding alternative effective potato-sprouting suppressants that have a negligible environmental impact (Paul et al. 2016). One of the CIPC alternatives is 1,4 dimethylnaphthalene (DMN), a naturally occurring compound in the potato tissues and other plants, and has been shown to be effective in controlling sprout development of stored ware potato tubers and is currently being used in many countries in the world (Campbell et al. 2010; de Weerd et al. 2010; Kleinkopf et al. 2003). DMN mode of action is still not clear, but it has been suggested that it may suspend/suppress normal cell division by inhibiting expression of genes that promote cell division or by enhancing expression of genes that inhibit cell division, which causes extension of dormancy period (Campbell et al. 2010, 2012; Kleinkopf et al. 2003). Other CIPC alternatives that have been found to suppress sprouting and sprout growth include natural compounds containing volatile monoterpenes and essential oils, such as cineole and eucalyptus oil (Vaughn & Spencer 1991, 1993; Knowles & Knowles 2008), caraway oil (Gómez-Castillo et al. 2013; Oosterhaven et al. 1995; Şanli et al. 2010; Teper-Bamnolker et al. 2010), peppermint, spearmint, clove, and mint oils (Gómez-Castillo et al. 2013; Kleinkopf et al. 2003; Teper-Bamnolker et al. 2010), menthe oil (Mehta & Kaul 2002), essential oils from aerial parts of Mentha spicata (Chauhan et al. 2011) and essential oils from Chenopodium ambrosioides and Lippia multiflora (Owolabi et al. 2010). Peppermint oil also has antioxidant and antimicrobial actions (Coleman et al. 2001; Frazier et al. 2004). Peppermint oil acts by physically burning or damaging the meristematic tissue to cease or disrupt cell proliferation (Frazier et al. 2004; Kleinkopf et al. 2003; Vaughn & Spencer 1991). These plant-derived natural compounds leave no residue on the tubers and hence are not toxic. But the efficiency of these alternative inhibitors depends on the cultivar, temperature of storage, progression of tuber dormancy, concentration, time and the number of applications, and the mode of the chemical action. Recently, we have shown that sprout suppression on tubers of tropical-adapted potato cultivars could be achieved for extended storage duration (Nyankanga et al. 2018). However, there are few published reports available in the literature that document the efficacy of these sprout suppressants at different storage temperatures, when applied on tubers of tropical-adapted potato cultivars. Similarly, the suppressive effects of peppermint oil at different storage temperatures, applied to tubers at postharvest as a biorational inhibitor relative to chemicals for sprout suppression in a tropic environment have not been adequately quantified. Therefore, the objective of this research was to determine the effects of temperature (10 °C and 23 °C) on the efficacy of CIPC, DMN and peppermint oil on sprout development on potato tubers of tropical-adapted cultivars following storage for 24 weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Potato cultivars and field plot establishment

Potato tubers of the three commercially cultivated cultivars, ‘Shangi’ (short dormancy), ‘Asante’ (medium dormancy) and ‘Kenya Mpya’ (medium to long dormancy) from Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Institute (KALRO, Tigoni) were used in the study (Nyankanga et al 2018). Potato crops were grown from April to July 2013 (cropping season 1) and from October 2013 to January 2014 (cropping season 2) at Kabete Field Station, University of Nairobi, Kenya. The site lies at an altitude of 1,737 meters above sea level and on 1°15’ S latitude and 36°44’ E longitude. The cropping location has a bimodal rainfall pattern with maximum rainfall amounts in April and November. The annual rainfall total is about 1,000 mm. The site has maximum and minimum mean temperatures of 24.3 °C and 13.7 °C, respectively. At the experimental site, the predominant soils are Nitisols, characterized with excessive drainage, dark reddish, friable clay type of soils (Jaetzold et al. 2006).

Potato tubers were planted in 4 m long by 4 rows plots with a spacing of 0.3 × 0.75 m in a completely randomized design with three replications per cultivar. Each plot had four rows and a total of sixty hills. Di-ammonium phosphate (DAP) fertilizer was applied at the planting time at the rate of 150 kg P·ha−1 and urea was applied as side dressing after full emergence at a rate of 100 kg N·ha−1. The agronomic practices utilized in the experimental plots were that recommended for potatoes cultivation in the tropical highlands. These consisted of weed management practices, plot ridging and pest control. Freshly harvested potato tubers free of any physical defects and with no evidence of disease occurrence and without any signs of sprouting were selected and maintained for 14 days at room temperature (25 °C) before applying the treatments.

Chemical and biorational inhibitor application and experiment set up

The experiment consisted of tubers from 3 potato cultivars × 4 treatments (CIPC, DMN, PPO and nontreated – distilled water) × 3 replications with a total of 36 treatment combinations. The experiment was a completely randomized design with three replications per treatment and twenty tubers per replication done in 23 °C and 10 °C storage temperatures. The same randomization was utilized for both storage temperatures. For the application of chlorpropham (CIPC), granules containing 95% a.i. (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were dissolved in sterile distilled water and subsequently sprayed uniformly on the potato tubers that were thinly spread on a plastic tray, with a dosage of 22 mg·kg−1 of active ingredient. After the treatment, the tubers were wrapped in airtight plastic bags for 24 hours. Twenty tubers per treatment and replication were packed in Khaki bags. The DMN chemical was applied at the rate of 100 mg a.i.·kg−1 of potato tuber as liquid aerosol. In the case of PPO, twenty potato tubers were placed in khaki bags and packed in plastic bags to prevent vaporization of the peppermint essential oil. Application of the essential oil treatments was based on the wick method used by Frazier et al. (2004). A filter paper impregnated with PPO was placed between the khaki and polyethylene bag so that no direct contact of the essential oil with potato tubers occurred, but vaporization of PPO exposed the tubers to essential oil. A dosage of 50 ppm per kg of potato was applied to the tubers for each treatment every 2 weeks. The storage bags were ventilated for 5 minutes twice per week to allow gaseous exchange on the tubers. In the control, distilled water was sprayed onto tubers. After the treatment, tubers were stored at 10 °C and 23 °C for 24 weeks. The experiment was conducted two times.

Data collection

Tubers were visually examined and sprouting was recorded weekly for 24 weeks, to determine the percentage of tubers with sprouts as well as the duration of sprouting inhibition relative to the tubers from the nontreated control, and the number of sprouts > 3 mm per tuber as well as sprouts length were evaluated.

Statistical analysis

Prior to analysis, the data were subjected to tests for normality of variances. In cases where the assumptions of normality and equality variances were not met, the percentage of sprouted tubers was arc square root transformed while the sprout length and number of sprouts per tuber were square root transformed to stabilize the variance prior to analysis. Data were analyzed separately for each experiment by PROC GLM of the Statistical Analysis System, SAS ver. 9.3 (SAS Institute, USA). The effects of chemical and biorational inhibitors, cultivars, as well as storage temperatures on sprout development on tubers (%) were subjected to analysis of variance.

RESULTS
Storage temperature, cultivar, and suppressant effects on sprouting of tubers

The percentage of tubers that developed sprouts varied between storage temperatures (10 °C vs. 23 °C), duration of storage and cultivars (Table 1 & 2). In the two seasons, sprouting was significantly influenced by the interaction effect of the temperature, sprout suppressant, cultivar and storage duration (Table 1 & 2). At 10 °C, no sprouts were observed in the untreated tubers until 10 weeks on ‘Asante’, 12 weeks on ‘Kenya Mpya’ and 6 weeks on ‘Shangi’ cultivars, respectively. In comparison, the percentage of untreated tubers that developed sprouts at 23 °C occurred at 8 weeks of storage on ‘Asante’ and ‘Kenya Mpya’ tubers, and at 2 weeks on ‘Shangi’ tubers (Table 1 & 2). For potato treated with CIPC and stored at 10 °C, no sprouts were recorded on tubers of any of the cultivars after 24 weeks of storage. Potato tubers treated with CIPC and stored at 23 °C developed sprouts at 20 weeks of storage on all the three cultivars (Table 1 & 2). Tubers treated with DMN and stored at 10 °C sprouted at 16 and 18 weeks of storage for ‘Shangi’ and ‘Asante’, respectively. For ‘Kenya Mpya’, tubers treated with DMN showed complete suppression of sprout development as no sprouts were observed even after 24 weeks. Tubers treated with DMN and stored at 23 °C sprouted faster than at 10 °C with the occurrence of sprouts on tubers at 4 weeks of storage on ‘Shangi’ tubers, 10 weeks on ‘Asante’ tubers and 16 weeks of storage on ‘Kenya Mpya’ tubers (Table 1 & 2). Tubers treated with PMO and stored at 10 °C had no sprouts up to 18 weeks of storage on ‘Asante’ and ‘Kenya Mpya’ tubers, but on ‘Shangi’ tubers, no sprouting occurred up to 14 weeks of storage. At 23 °C, on tubers treated with PMO, sprouts were recorded at 10 weeks of storage on ‘Shangi’ tubers and at 16 weeks of storage on ‘Asante’ and ‘Kenya Mpya’ tubers. Overall, sprout development increased with increased storage period (weeks) for tubers of the three cultivars especially at 23 °C.

Sprout suppressant and cultivar effects on percentage of potato tubers that sprouted (mean ± standard error) following postharvest tuber treatment with CIPC, DMN, PPO and nontreated tubers stored at 10 °C and 23 °C in season 1

Storage duration (weeks)
Storage Temp. Treatment Cultivar 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
10 °C Control ‘Asante’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 30±8.8 83.3±20.5 90±26.4 100±32.8 100±36.4 100±35.0 100±35.3
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 30±12.0 33.3±10.8 36.7±14.6 46.7±17
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 30±7.8 23.3±9.1 16.6±8.8
Control ‘Kenya Mpya’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 46.7±17.1 93.3±27.3 100±31.0 100±24.7 100±25.3 100±24.0
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 26.7±5.9 16.7±3.8 13.3±4.1
Control ‘Shangi’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 20±5.8 80±23.1 100±29.4 100±36.5 100±35.3 100±31.4 100±30.6 100±29.3 100±27.8
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 16.7±7.7 23.3±9.6 30±11.6 33.3±11.8 36.7±6.5
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 33.3±11.8 23.3±8.0 16.7±5.0 10±3.3 10±2.6

23 °C Control ‘Asante’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 80±24.72 100±23.03 100±28.6 100±33.5 100±22.9 100±24.7 100±26.0 100±43.67
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 3.3±1.2 6.7±3.4 16.7±9.7
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 60±18.4 63.3±19.0 63.3±18.3 63.3±22.6 63.3±18.3 63.3±19.5 63.3±18.3 63.3±16.0
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 26.7±9.1 20±5.2 20±4.3 20±5.4 26.6±9.8
Control ‘Kenya Mpya’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 80±23.4 96.7±20.3 100±28.7 100±30.3 100±36.23 100±39.2 100±39.8 100±35.9
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 3.3±1.5 6.7±2.9 10±2.1
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 3.3±1.1 6.7± 1.4 13.3±4.4 16.7±4.8 20±5.0
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 30±10.6 33.3±5.9 23.3±4.8 20±5.4 26.6±5.8
Control ‘Shangi’ 0±0.0 93.3±26.8 100±28.8 100±34.2 100±30.5 100±35.1 100±35.1 100±31.8 100±34.2 100±30.0 100±23.6 100±33.0
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 10±3.2 13.3±3.3 23.3±6.1
DMN 0±0.0 3.3±1.1 16.7±3.8 73.3±22.6 76.7±23.4 76.7±19.0 76.7±18.0 76.7±18.4 76.7±19.0 76.7±23.0 76.7±19.1 76.7±25.3
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 46.7±14.6 36.7±8.0 26.7±9.0 23.3±7.7 16.7±5.4 20.0±4.8 23.3±5.2 30.0±7.7

P-value for: Storage Temp. = <0.001; Treatment = < 0.001; Cultivar = 0.001; Storage Temp. × Treatment = 0.001; Storage Temp. × Cultivar = 0.074; Treatment × Cultivar=< 0.001; Storage Temp. × Treatment × Cultivar= 0.211

CIPC = chlorpropham, DMN = 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, PPO = peppermint essential oil

Probability of F statistic for 24 weeks of storage duration (under the table)

Sprout suppressant and cultivar effects on percentage of potato tubers that sprouted (mean ± standard error) subsequent to postharvest treatment with CIPC, DMN, PPO and nontreated tubers at 10 °C and 23 °C in season 2

Storage duration (weeks)
Storage Temp. Treatment Cultivar 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
10 °C Control ‘Asante’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 27.6±7.8 74.1±17.8 80±22.9 100±28.8 100±31.7 100±30.5 100±31.2
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 24.8±10.4 29.6±9.4 32.7±12.7 41.5±14.8
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 25±6.8 20.7±7.9 15.7±7.7
Control ‘Kenya Mpya’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 41.7±17.1 83.1±28.3 100±33.2 100±26.7 100±27.1 100±25.7
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 26.7±6.3 16.7±3.3 13.3±3.6
Control ‘Shangi’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 17.8±5.1 71.2±20.1 100±31.4 100±38.5 100±37.3 100±33.2 100±32.1 100±31.3 100±29.7
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 14.9±7.7 20.7±9.6 26.7±11.6 29.6±11.8 32.7±6.5
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 30.3±11.8 19.3±8.0 14.8±5.0 124±3.3 12±2.6

23 °C Control ‘Asante’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 78.4±21.7 93.3±26.3 100±28.6 100±33.5 100±25.9 100±33.3 100±30.4 100±37.9
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 3.3±1.2 6.7±3.4 16.7±9.7
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 58.6±18.4 60.7±19.0 62.8±18.3 65.3±22.6 64.9±18.3 62.7±19.5 62.7±18.3 62.7±16.0
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 23.8±9.1 17.6±5.2 18.7±4.3 18.7±5.4 23.7±9.8
Control ‘Kenya Mpya’ 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 80±27.4 86.1±23.3 100±32.8 100±35.1 100±42.2 100±45.2 100±39.8 100±40.9
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 3.3±1.5 6.7±2.9 10±2.1
DMN 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 2.7±1.3 5.3±1.6 12.8±4.4 15.9±4.8 19.7±5.1
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 26.7±9.2 29.6±6.9 20.9±5.6 20.7±5.4 23.6±5.8
Control ‘Shangi’ 0±0.0 83.1±23.3 89.7±33.8 100±40.2 100±35.5 100±41.1 100±38.1 100±37.2 100±40.2 100±35.1 100±27.6 100±38.6
CIPC 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 8.9±3.7 10.7±3.8 24.3±7.1
DMN 0±0.0 4.8±1.3 20.7±4.5 65.3±24.6 70.7±26.9 74.8±22.3 77.2±21.1 79.6±21.5 79.7±22.2 78.5±26.9 77.3±22.3 78.7±29.6
PPO 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 0±0.0 39.3±17.1 34.2±9.4 27.4±7.8 24.9±6.7 18.5±4.6 21.3±4.2 22.8±4.5 27.1±6.7

P-value for: Storage Temp. =< 0.001; Treatment = < 0.001; Cultivar =0.021; Storage Temp. × Treatment = 0.001; Storage Temp. × Cultivar = 0.063; Treatment × Cultivar=< 0.001; Storage Temp. × Treatment × Cultivar = 0.145

CIPC = chlorpropham, DMN = 1,4-dimethylnaphthalene, PPO = peppermint essential oil

Probability of F statistic for 24 weeks of storage duration (under the table)

After 18 weeks of storage, 100% of the untreated tubers from the three cultivars developed sprouts regardless of storage temperature in the two seasons (Table 1 & 2).

Storage temperature, cultivar, and suppressant effects on sprout length

Sprouts of all cultivars at both storage temperatures and duration were the longest in control tubers (Fig. 1). The effect of inhibitors on sprout length (mm) varied with storage temperatures and duration of storage in the two seasons. In both seasons, tuber sprout lengths were consistently lower at 10 °C than at 23 °C. The sprouts were longest on the untreated tubers stored at 23 °C followed by those untreated and stored at 10 °C. The shortest sprouts were on the samples with CIPC treatment. The tubers treated with CIPC and stored at 10 °C did not have sprouts, even after 24 weeks of storage. Tubers treated with peppermint essential oil had shorter sprouts at 10 °C than at 23 °C. Tubers treated with peppermint oil (PMO) and stored at 10 °C had shorter sprouts than tubers treated with DMN. ‘Kenya Mpya’ was more responsive to DMN treatment than ‘Shangi’ and ‘Asante’ at the two storage temperatures in the two seasons. In both seasons, the length of sprouts increased the storage time irrespective of the treatments.

Storage temperature, cultivar, and suppressant effects on sprouts number

Storage temperature effect on sprout number varied significantly among cultivars, treatments, and storage duration (Fig. 2). For ‘Shangi’, the untreated tubers had the highest number of sprouts at both storage temperatures. At 23 °C, the mean number of sprouts per tuber of ‘Shangi’ (averaged across weeks) was significantly lower for tubers treated with CIPC, followed by those treated with peppermint oil, DMN and nontreated tubers, respectively. Similar trend was observed for this cultivar stored at 10 °C. On the tubers of ‘Kenya Mpya’, the mean number of sprouts per tuber (averaged across weeks) was significantly lower for those tubers treated with CIPC, followed by DMN, peppermint oil and non-treated tubers. In ‘Asante’ stored at 23 °C, CIPC had the greatest sprout suppressive activity, followed by peppermint oil, DMN and the nontreated tubers. Overall, ‘Shangi’ had the highest number of sprouts per tuber while the tubers of ‘Kenya Mpya’ had the lowest mean number at both storage temperatures. Despite observations of early sprouting on tubers treated with DMN, this treatment mostly suppressed the number of sprouts per tuber compared to the untreated tubers at the completion of the experiment due to drop-off of necrotic sprouts and their eventual removal. Similarly, at 10 °C, the mean number of sprouts per tuber was significantly greater on the untreated tubers than CIPC, DMN and peppermint oil treatments. The sprout numbers per tuber were influenced by storage temperatures and were consistently lower at 10 °C than at 23 °C, regardless of the cultivars used.

Fig. 1

Effect of storage temperature (23 °C and 10 °C) on sprout length of three cultivars ‘Asante’, ‘Kenya Mpya’, and ‘Shangi’ following tuber treatment with CIPC, DMN, peppermint oil and untreated stored for 24 weeks

Fig. 2

Effect of storage temperature (10 °C; 23 °C) on sprout number of three cultivars ‘Asante’, ‘Kenya Mpya’ and ‘Shangi’ following tuber treatment with CIPC, DMN, peppermint oil and untreated stored for 24 weeks

DISCUSSION

Storage temperatures significantly affected sprout development of potato tubers and lower percentage of tubers with sprouts was recorded at 10 °C than at 23 °C. Therefore, in the absence of inhibitor applications, tubers from tropical-adapted potato cultivars can be stored at 10 °C for some duration. Application of synthetic and natural inhibitors delayed and decreased sprouting but both storage temperature and genotype influenced these parameters. In a previous study (Nyankanga et al. 2018), differences in dormancy period of cultivars were recorded and shown to vary with the application of chemical inhibitors under ambient tropical conditions.

The most dramatic effect was achieved with CIPC, which inhibited the germination of all tubers at 10 °C and up to week 20 at 23 °C, but at this storage temperature, an effect of genotype was observed. Our results are similar to the previous study, which showed the efficacy of CIPC on potato tubers (Mehta & Kaul 1991; Mehta 2004; Nyankanga et al. 2018; Şanli et al. 2010); however, also some toxicity of CIPC on tubers was observed (Mondy et al. 1992). The same authors reported that tubers treated with CIPC and stored at 5 °C contained higher residue levels than those stored at 20 °C. The residue levels of CIPC decreased with storage duration (Sakaliene et al. 2008; Singh & Ezekiel 2010). We hypothesize that the single application of CIPC required for the entire duration of potato storage may be economically feasible for resource-constrained potato farmers in the highland tropics under ambient conditions under which it has been shown to have less residue levels. Therefore, it may be feasible to remove potato tubers treated with CIPC from storage and expose it to elevated temperatures (>25 °C) for several days to minimize residue levels on tubers destined for consumption. In this research, we did not assess the residue levels of CIPC on potato tubers, but hypothesize that due to the longer duration of storage (>20 weeks) under elevated temperatures, residue levels may be quite low (Mehta & Ezekiel 2003).

Also, DMN and peppermint essential oil were more effective in delaying sprouting at 10 °C than at 23 °C. On tubers of ‘Kenya Mpya’ stored at 10 °C, DMN treatment completely inhibited sprout development, suggesting that it could provide complete sprout suppression for tubers of this cultivar but not at 23 °C as sprout development was recorded. Their inhibiting influence was also dependent on storage temperature and tuber genotype. Inhibition caused by PPO was weaker than DMN at 10 °C for ‘Asante’ and ‘Kenya Mpya’. At 23 °C, PPO inhibited sprouting weaker than DMN in ‘Kenya Mpya’ but stronger in ‘Asante’ and ‘Shangi’. The efficacy of essential oil derived from peppermint for sprout inhibition on potato has been previously documented (Song et al. 2008). It has been demonstrated that essential oil (derived from plants), whose composition consisted mainly of monoterpenes and carvone, are effective in reducing sprouting, tuber weight loss and tuber rot over a 225-day storage (Alamar et al. 2017). The sprout inhibition by compounds derived from essential oils of carvone, acts by preventing dormancy break and inhibits sprout growth after dormancy initiation (Oosterhaven et al. 1995). However, because of the volatility of essential oil, it has been suggested that multiple applications of essential oils are needed for inhibition of sprout development on tubers. Additional mode of actions of essential oils were postulated to be associated with disruption of microbial cell membranes. Furthermore, it has been shown that some essential oil contains compounds of the unsaturated ketone group, which inhibits sprout growth (Capelle et al. 1996). Other mechanisms of essential oils have been associated with the degradation of enzymes that are crucial for the biosynthesis of cytokinin, gibberellic acid and abscisic acid, and membrane components of the cell, thereby affecting sprout development.

Sprouts of tubers treated with DMN and stored at 10 °C had sprout length of <2.6 mm throughout the storage duration, while tubers at 23 °C had greater sprout length (≥6 mm). In this research, we noted that even though tubers of ‘Asante’ and ‘Shangi’ treated with DMN sprouted at the same time as untreated tubers following storage at 23 °C, the percentage of sprouting and sprout length were greatly reduced. In a similar research, it was reported that two applications of DMN at 200 and 300 mg·kg−1 were equal to CIPC treatment in the dose 22 mg·kg−1 in the suppression of sprout elongation after 295 days in storage at 7 °C (Lewis et al. 1997).

In this study, it was observed that the number of sprouts at the completion of storage experiment was reduced considerably for ‘Shangi’ and ‘Asante’ tubers exposed to DMN treatment. This may have been a consequence of the dry necrotic sprouts dropping from tubers, perhaps due to tuber handling. Therefore, tubers of cultivars that exhibited short dormancy under ambient (23 °C) storage conditions would behave similarly under cold storage (10 °C), when compared to the tubers of cultivars with longer dormancy duration. However, previous researchers noted reduced sprout elongation of tubers subsequent to treatment with DMN and storage at 10 to 17 °C compared to the untreated tubers (Lewis et al. 1997). Therefore, our research results imply that tuber treatment with DMN suppressed sprout growth and greatly reduced sprout elongation at the two storage temperatures.

CONCLUSIONS

DMN and peppermint oil, the use of which is not prohibited, also provided comparatively good sprouting inhibition under storage of potato tubers in ambient temperature, indicating that they could be used by resource-constraint potato farmers in tropics as an alternative to CIPC.

eISSN:
2353-3978
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, Biotechnology, Plant Science, Ecology, other