[Anderson, T.W., Darling, D.A., 1954. A test of goodness of fit. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 765-769.10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232]Search in Google Scholar
[Baráth, C., Ittzés, A., Ugrósdy, G., 1996. Biometry. (Biometria.) Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest. (In Hungarian.) ]Search in Google Scholar
[Brevik, E.C., Fenton, T.E., 2002. The relative influence of soil water, clay, temperature, and carbonate minerals on soil electrical conductivity readings taken with an EM-38 along a Mollisol catena in central Iowa. Soil Survey Horizons, 43, 9-13.10.2136/sh2002.1.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, P.G., Walker, G.R., Buselli, G., Potts, I., Dodds, A.R., 1992. The application of electromagnetic techniques to groundwater recharge investigations. Journal of Hydrology, 130, 201-229.10.1016/0022-1694(92)90111-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2003. Application of soil electrical conductivity to precision agriculture. Theory, principles and guidelines. Agron. J., 95, 455-471.10.2134/agronj2003.4550]Search in Google Scholar
[Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 2005. Apparent electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 11-43.10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Corwin, D.L., Rhoades, J.D., 1982. An improved technique for determining soil electrical conductivity-depth relations from above-ground electromagnetic measurements. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46, 517-520.10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600030014x]Search in Google Scholar
[Corwin, D.L., Rhoades, J.D., 1984. Measurement of inverted electrical conductivity profiles using electromagnetic induction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 48, 288-291.10.2136/sssaj1984.03615995004800020011x]Search in Google Scholar
[Dean, R.B., Dixon, W.J., 1951. Simplified statistics for small numbers of observations. Anal. Chem., 1951, 23(4), 636-638.10.1021/ac60052a025]Search in Google Scholar
[Doležal, F., Matula, S., Barradas, J.M.M., 2012. Improved horizontal installation of large soil moisture content sensors and interpretation of their readings in terms of preferential flow. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 60, 2012, 4, 333-338.10.2478/v10098-012-0029-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellsbury, M.M., Woodson, W.D., Malo, D.D., Clay, D.E., Carlson, C.G., Clay, S.A., 1999. Spatial variability in corn rootworm distribution in relation to spatially variable soil factors and crop condition. In: Robert, P.C., Rust, R.H., Larson, W.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Precision Agriculture, St. Paul, MN, 19-22July 1998. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, 523-533.10.2134/1999.precisionagproc4.c46]Search in Google Scholar
[Fitterman, D.V., Stewart, M.T., 1986. Transient electromagnetic sounding for groundwater. Geophysics, 51, 995-1005.10.1190/1.1442158]Search in Google Scholar
[Grubbs, F., 1969. Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples. Technometrics, 11(1), 1-21.10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657]Search in Google Scholar
[Halvorson, A.D., Rhoades, J.D., 1976. Field mapping soil conductivity to delineate dryland seeps with four electrode techniques. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 571-575.10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000040032x]Search in Google Scholar
[Justel, A., Peña, D., Zamar, R., 1997. A multivariate Kolmogorov- Smirnov test of goodness of fit. Statistics and Probability Letters, 35(3), 251-259.10.1016/S0167-7152(97)00020-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaffka, S.R., Lesch, S.M., Bali, K.M., Corwin, D.L., 2005. Site-specific management in salt-affected sugar beet fields using electromagnetic induction. Comput. Electron. Agric., 46, 329-350.10.1016/j.compag.2004.11.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Kravchenko, A.N., Bullock, D.G., 2000. Correlation of corn and soybean gain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron. J., 92, 75-83.10.2134/agronj2000.92175x]Search in Google Scholar
[Milics, G., 2013. Mapping soil properties for precision agriculture. Növénytermelés, 62, Suppl., 405-408.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milics, G., Balla, I., Deákvári, J., Jolánkai, M., Nagy, V., Stekauerová, V., Neményi, M., 2012. Soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity measurements in site - specific agriculture. Pollution and Water Resources Columbia University Seminar Series, XLI, 219-231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Milne, B.T., 1991. Heterogeneity as a multiscale characteristic of landscapes. In: Kolasa, J., Pickett, S.T.A. (Eds.). Ecological heterogeneity. Ecological studies., 86, New York, NY., Springer-Verlag, 69-84.10.1007/978-1-4612-3062-5_4]Search in Google Scholar
[Paraskevas, C., Georgiu, P., Ilias, A., Panoras, A., Babajimopoulos, C., 2012. Calibration equations for two capacitance water content probes. Int. Agrophys., 2012, 26, 285-293.10.2478/v10247-012-0041-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rhoades, J.D., Corwin, D.L., Lesch, S.M., 1999. Geospatial measurements of soil electrical conductivity to assess soil salinity and diffuse salt loading from irrigation. In: Corwin, D.L., Loague, K., Ellsworth, T.R. (Eds.), Assessment of non-point source pollution in the vadose zone. Geophysical Monograph 108, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 197-215.10.1029/GM108p0197]Search in Google Scholar
[Shah, P.H., Shingh, D.N., 2005. Generalized Archie’s law for estimation of soil electrical conductivity. Journal of ASTM International, 2(5), 1-20.10.1520/JAI13087]Search in Google Scholar
[Sharma, B.D., Kar, S., Sarkar, S., 1997. Calibration of a water uptake simulation model under varying soil moisture regime and nitrogen level for wheat crop. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 83(1-2), 135-146.10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02341-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, B.G., Hoey, D., 1987. The use of electromagnetic induction to detect the spatial variability of salt and clay contents of soils. Aust. J. Soil Res., 25, 21-27. 10.1071/SR9870021]Search in Google Scholar