Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review

1. Pine J, Stevenson L, On J. Intestinal stomas. Surgery (Oxford). 2020;38:51-57.10.1016/j.mpsur.2019.10.020 Search in Google Scholar

2. Burch J. Exploring the conditions leading to stoma-forming surgery. Br J Nurs. 2005;14:94-98.10.12968/bjon.2005.14.2.1743815750510 Search in Google Scholar

3. Jabbal IS, Spaulding AC, Lemini R, et al. Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37:823-833.10.1007/s00384-022-04116-835201413 Search in Google Scholar

4. Ronnekleiv-Kelly SM, Kennedy GD. Management of stage IV rectal cancer: Palliative options. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:835-847.10.3748/wjg.v17.i7.835305113421412493 Search in Google Scholar

5. Fazio VW. Indications and surgical alternatives for palliation of rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:262-265.10.1016/j.gassur.2003.11.01915019919 Search in Google Scholar

6. Ambe PC, Kurz NR, Nitschke C, et al. Intestinal Ostomy. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2018;115:182-187. Search in Google Scholar

7. Costi R, Leonardi F, Zanoni D, et al. Palliative care and end-stage colorectal cancer management: The surgeon meets the oncologist. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:7602-7621.10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7602406929024976699 Search in Google Scholar

8. Park Y, Choi DU, Kim HO, et al. Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction. Ann Coloproctology. Epub ahead of print 7 March 2022.10.3393/ac.2021.00682.0097944153635255204 Search in Google Scholar

9. Marin AW, Di Giorgio A, Destito C, et al. Typology of defunctioning colostomy and state of art in the treatment of bowel emergencies. Ann Ital Chir. 2005;76:157-160. Search in Google Scholar

10. Park JJ, Del Pino A, Orsay CP, et al. Stoma complications: the Cook County Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1575-1580.10.1007/BF0223621010613476 Search in Google Scholar

11. Sheetz KH, Waits SA, Krell RW, et al. Complication Rates of Ostomy Surgery Are High and Vary Significantly Between Hospitals. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:632-637.10.1097/DCR.0000000000000038419714324819104 Search in Google Scholar

12. Malik T, Lee M, Harikrishnan A. The incidence of stoma related morbidity – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:501-508.10.1308/rcsann.2018.0126621407330112948 Search in Google Scholar

13. Duchesne JC, Wang YZ, Weintraub SL, et al. Stoma complications: a multivariate analysis. Am Surg. 2002;68:961-966.10.1177/000313480206801106 Search in Google Scholar

14. Saunders Richard N, Hemingway D. Intestinal stomas. Surgery (Oxford). 2008;26:347-351.10.1016/j.mpsur.2008.05.011 Search in Google Scholar

15. Hendren S, Hammond K, Glasgow SC, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ostomy Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58:375-387.10.1097/DCR.0000000000000347 Search in Google Scholar

16. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12:958-964.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02006.x Search in Google Scholar

17. Kwiatt M, Kawata M. Avoidance and Management of Stomal Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26:112-121.10.1055/s-0033-1348050 Search in Google Scholar

18. Macdonald A, Chung D, Fell S, et al. An assessment of surgeons’ abilities to site colostomies accurately. Surgeon. 2003;1:347-349.10.1016/S1479-666X(03)80070-7 Search in Google Scholar

19. Cataldo PA. Technical Tips for Stoma Creation in the Challenging Patient. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;21:17-22.10.1055/s-2008-1055317278018620011392 Search in Google Scholar

20. Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JMD. Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:191-197.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02107.x19888956 Search in Google Scholar

21. Colwell JC, Goldberg M, Carmel J. The state of the standard diversion. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2001;28:6-17.10.1097/00152192-200101000-00004 Search in Google Scholar

22. Kann BR. Early Stomal Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;21:23-30.10.1055/s-2008-1055318278019120011393 Search in Google Scholar

23. Schleicher C, Senninger N, Vowinkel T, et al. Stoma prolapse and stoma retraction. Chirurg. 2010;81:978-981.10.1007/s00104-010-1931-520967531 Search in Google Scholar

24. Zhang JE, Wong FKY, You LM, et al. A qualitative study exploring the nurse telephone follow-up of patients returning home with a colostomy. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21:1407-1415.10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03824.x21843207 Search in Google Scholar

25. Sohn YJ, Moon SM, Shin US, et al. Incidence and Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia. J Korean Soc Coloproctology. 2012;28:241-246.10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.241349942423185703 Search in Google Scholar

26. Robertson I, Leung E, Hughes D, et al. Prospective analysis of stoma-related complications. Colorectal Dis. 2005;7:279-285.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00785.x15859968 Search in Google Scholar

27. Jones HG, Rees M, Aboumarzouk OM, et al. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD008905.10.1002/14651858.CD008905.pub3651362430027652 Search in Google Scholar

28. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018;22:183-198.10.1007/s10029-017-1697-529134456 Search in Google Scholar

29. Husain SG, Cataldo TE. Late Stomal Complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2008;21:31-40.10.1055/s-2008-1055319278019420011394 Search in Google Scholar

30. Mohammed O, West M, Chandrasekar R. Granulated sugar to reduce an incarcerated prolapsed defunctioning ileostomy. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007565.10.1136/bcr-2012-007565360442823449830 Search in Google Scholar

31. Maeda K, Maruta M, Utsumi T, et al. Pathophysiology and prevention of loop stomal prolapse in the transverse colon. Tech Coloproctology. 2003;7:108-111.10.1007/s10151-003-0020-x14605931 Search in Google Scholar

32. Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, Koyama M, et al. Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse. J Clin Med. 2021;10:5438.10.3390/jcm10225438862209934830719 Search in Google Scholar

33. Ferguson HJM, Bhalerao S. Correction of end colostomy prolapse using a curved surgical stapler, performed under sedation. Tech Coloproctology. 2010;14:165-167.10.1007/s10151-010-0568-120309716 Search in Google Scholar

34. Koide Y, Maeda K, Katsuno H, et al. Outcomes of stapler repair with anastomosis for stoma prolapse. Surg Today. 2021;51:226-231.10.1007/s00595-020-02076-632656699 Search in Google Scholar

35. Cheung MT. Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg. 1995;65:808-811.10.1111/j.1445-2197.1995.tb00566.x7487732 Search in Google Scholar

36. Caricato M, Ausania F, Ripetti V, et al. Retrospective analysis of long-term defunctioning stoma complications after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9:559-561.10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.01187.x17573753 Search in Google Scholar

37. Hobbs MM, Ortega-Loayza AG. Pyoderma gangrenosum: From historical perspectives to emerging investigations. Int Wound J. 2020;17:1255-1265.10.1111/iwj.13389794918732378319 Search in Google Scholar

38. Wu X, Shen B. Diagnosis and management of parastomal pyoderma gangrenosum. Gastroenterol Rep. 2013;1:1-8.10.1093/gastro/got013394143824759661 Search in Google Scholar

39. Afifi L, Sanchez IM, Wallace MM, et al. Diagnosis and management of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:1195-1204.10.1016/j.jaad.2017.12.04929288099 Search in Google Scholar

40. de Miguel Velasco M, Jiménez Escovar F, Parajó Calvo A. Current Status of the Prevention and Treatment of Stoma Complications. A Narrative Review. Cir Esp. 2014;92:149-156.10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.09.01124411562 Search in Google Scholar

41. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca219638912 Search in Google Scholar

42. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae136012315273542 Search in Google Scholar

43. Shellito PC. Complications of abdominal stoma surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1562-1572.10.1007/BF022373089860339 Search in Google Scholar

44. Strong SA. The Difficult Stoma: Challenges and Strategies. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29:152-159.10.1055/s-0036-1580628488218027247541 Search in Google Scholar

45. Kojima K, Nakamura T, Sato T, et al. Risk factors for parastomal hernia after abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017;10:276-281.10.1111/ases.1236928321992 Search in Google Scholar

46. Zelga P, Kluska P, Zelga M, et al. Patient-Related Factors Associated With Stoma and Peristomal Complications Following Fecal Ostomy Surgery: A Scoping Review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2021;48:415-430.10.1097/WON.000000000000079634495932 Search in Google Scholar

47. Guriţă P, Popa R, Bălălău B, et al. Parastomal hernia mesh repair, variant of surgical technique without stoma relocation. J Med Life. 2012;5:157-161. Search in Google Scholar

48. Israelsson LA. Preventing and treating parastomal hernia. World J Surg. 2005;29:1086-1089.10.1007/s00268-005-7973-z15981038 Search in Google Scholar

49. Heo SC, Oh HK, Song YS, et al. Surgical Treatment of a Parastomal Hernia. J Korean Soc Coloproctology. 2011;27:174-179.10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.174318059721980587 Search in Google Scholar

50. De Robles MS, Young CJ. Parastomal hernia repair with onlay mesh remains a safe and effective approach. BMC Surg. 2020;20:296.10.1186/s12893-020-00964-9768800033234128 Search in Google Scholar

51. Pastor DM, Pauli EM, Koltun WA, et al. Parastomal hernia repair: a single center experience. JSLS. 2009;13:170-175. Search in Google Scholar

52. McLemore EC, Harold KL, Efron JE, et al. Parastomal hernia: short-term outcome after laparoscopic and conventional repairs. Surg Innov. 2007;14:199-204.10.1177/155335060730727517928619 Search in Google Scholar